Mafiascum.net

In post 2294, tea leaves wrote:Hobbes and I definitely aren't doused.

Any 2 in [Isis, Bell, Morning, Farren] I could see? Isis slightly less likely because she was being FoSed by many EoD yesterday.

i would have totally doused Hobbes?

Maybe Bell first, outer chance of Farren. I wouldnt douse morning or Isis

In post 2318, tea leaves wrote:lol

It's me pressuring Morning to do stuff because I don't like how she's dropped off and not made many conclusions since I completely switched on her.

Really now..

i've sort of dropped off after making a case for town GL who you seriously wanted to keep in the elim pool. Bell I also town cased. Farren i havent rigorously reviewed I guess. Isis i am soul reading

I'm not sure what you're expecting me to do. GL still hasn't showed up. why is dropping off scummy? It wasn't even that long..
...

Why would you douse Hobbes?

tempted to vote Isis for the leafeon comments

@tea General disbelief in Ydrasse v. GL being SvS. I would have thought everyone would see it like me as TvS, and had GL has higher town than he is rn

I thought you'd have more comments to make on everything I was saying on Bell.

Looks like Hobbes is being replaced now.

In post 2304, tea leaves wrote:VOTE: Morning

You're being really non-committal. Like, saying you might be swayed by my self-meta, or you're not sure about Bell's responses, and throwing out a lot of info of events, but not very much analysis. Do something with your research!

Oh for some reason I thought this post was talking to Isis despite you voting me in it lol

All I've got to say: AND YOURE SCUMREADING ME FOR THAT? YOU'RE SCUMREADING ME FOR *NOT* DOING ANALYSIS AND BEING WISHY WASHY

IE THE OPPOSITE OF MY SCUMPLAY DESCRIBED IN A CLEAR AND CONCISE PARAGRAPH

VOTE: tea leaves

ISIS HAS ME YELLING NOW

THERE IS NO GOD DAMN WAY TEA IS SCUMREADING ME FOR BEING WISHY WASHY AND NOT OFFERING LENGTHY ANALYSIS.

I AM CONSISTENTLY INDECISIVE AS TOWN AND HE KNOWS THAT. NOT TO MENTION LENGTHY ANALYSIS POSTS ARE GENERALLY SCUM INDICTATIVE FOR ME

HE IS AN ARSONIST TRYING TO BAMBOOZLE YOU ALL AS WE SPEAK AND I AM CALLING BS

This is hilarious. I'm having so much fun this game

I wasn't scumreading you, it was a pressure vote to get you to say more stuff. I still townread you at the time of that post just fyi

alright satan

i have no idea how we're going to read Guilty's replacement

In post 2387, Morning Tweet wrote:i have no idea how

I'M*

going to read Guilty's replacement

correction

I'm not really sure what they're going to say to change my mind how i feel on his behaviour towards Ydrasse, is what i mean

I have a mean case of the hiccups today.

In post 2374, tea leaves wrote:The toxicity? That's pretty weird

Your banter with each other, I mean.

tea leaves - 2 (MT, Isis)
Isis - 1 (Bell)
GuiltyLion - 1 (tea leaves)

(assuming "Hobbes" gets tallied as a vote for GuiltyLion)

In post 2286, Dunnstral wrote:What do you mean? She would know who her partner is regardless of daytalk, right? So she'd know I was town, and wouldn't expect me to be fake claiming

True. But if GL was her partner, she wouldn't know for sure that *he* wouldn't fake-claim. If GL's Town, then she would know that he wouldn't CC - since she'd know that your claim was good.

I think it's additional evidence that GL is Town - that if she and GL were partners, she would not have voted for him at that point.

Isis, why were you trying to get Bell to hammer here?

In post 2305, Isis wrote:VOTE: tea

In post 2306, Isis wrote:2304 is a scumpost

In post 2307, Isis wrote:bell vote with me

Morning Tweet, I went looking for that towncase on Isis. 2030 seemed to be as close as you got. I looked that over - the only one of the posts that really resonated with me was 1746 - that felt both genuine and town-indicative (assuming Ydrasse was Town and thus would be around to question after being eliminated, which was wrong.) The rest ... eh. It doesn't feel like you walked away from that convinced.

Where do you stand now on that?

I had the sense that Bell wasn't doing much solving lately. On re-read, that looks wrong. Unless you define "lately" as "in the last 48 hours or so". But I was thinking in terms of D3, which is wrong.

I don't like 2339, though - especially not after reading 1930.

Bell, what happened between those two?

Still like Isis but don't know if I can quantify it

In post 2395, Farren wrote:I had the sense that Bell wasn't doing much solving lately. On re-read, that looks wrong. Unless you define "lately" as "in the last 48 hours or so". But I was thinking in terms of D3, which is wrong.

I don't like 2339, though - especially not after reading 1930.

Bell, what happened between those two?

400 posts of other players seeming town.

In post 2396, Morning Tweet wrote:Still like Isis but don't know if I can quantify it

So you did walk away from your case convinced?

Every excuse and reason from tea leaves and MT looks reasonable to me.

I did not like his push on me, at first I thought he was being intentionally dense as a means of pressure, but the more he did it the less it made sense that was what he was doing.