Mafiascum.net

In post 2372, Blitzo wrote:Pedit - Okay I guess but is that really a bad thing?

Not at all imo
I'm not the one promoting that idea as meaning anything rn anyway

In post 2353, Battle Mage wrote:haha i can tell you really wanted that pagetop Flea

VOTE: Titus

I am only satisfyied with page 69.

Because I can "nice!" it.

In post 2372, Blitzo wrote:Pooky not being here is definitely suspect.
It fits with his modus operandi from last game of only popping in when his neck was on the line.
It was extremely apparent towards EoD of day 1 and this sort of mirrors that.
Pedit - Okay I guess but is that really a bad thing?
Above @Gamma ofc.
PEDIT 2 - BM that is a blatant misrepresentation of the points I'm making.

lol I didn't even have to read who made this post to know. Random attack on Pooky for no good reason. Blitzo for sure.

The only thing that makes me feel better about an HC vote is the wagon makeup, which I think is good. I feel a little iffy about blitzo and TGP but not enough for me to hate the wagon.

In post 2370, Battle Mage wrote:is Haschel's sole-minded focus on Titus any worse than Titus' sole-minded focus on me? I think not, therefore I think Titus is the play for you.

I think they really different. Titus has talked about other stuff and seems apathetic about the game overall. Haschel's only other posts about anything else were like a 1-off question to Flea about DGB and otherwise, despite not posting much he's been very emphatic and seemingly passionate, just busy IRL (I presume).

Like that heat at me I'm seeing from Haschel isn't coming from Titus and I think that's a pretty key difference here.

In post 2373, Taly wrote:

In post 2366, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2363, Taly wrote:Fuck.

I agree with

BM's

assessment that my understanding of the game is best approached with a

Titus

flip.
I feel like

Haschel's

sole-minded focus on

Titus

is still really weird.
I don't like

TGP's

last minute rally to lim

Haschel

even though I somewhat wagoned him earlier.
While I disagree with

Akarin's

perception of

Haschel's

reply,

Titus

is a townread for several of my townreads.

how are you weighing these rn?

Consequences of

Titus

or

HC

potential townflip. I agree with

Murder

, I have issue finding

Hasch

in a specific solve right now.

I will say, I'm good with the night plan.

p-edit

Battle Mage wrote:

In post 2363, Taly wrote:Fuck.

I agree with

BM's

assessment that my understanding of the game is best approached with a

Titus

flip.
I feel like

Haschel's

sole-minded focus on

Titus

is still really weird.
I don't like

TGP's

last minute rally to lim

Haschel

even though I somewhat wagoned him earlier.
While I disagree with

Akarin's

perception of

Haschel's

reply,

Titus

is a townread for several of my townreads.

question for you Taly - is Haschel's sole-minded focus on Titus any worse than Titus' sole-minded focus on me? I think not, therefore I think Titus is the play for you.

And to play devil's advocate, is it accurate to say you've focused a lot on

Titus

D1?

I think it would be comparing apples to oranges, given I've focused on LOTS of people (most of the votes on me are for my volatile voting) and been involved in lots of discussions. Titus has literally only really shown up to say "yeah BM scum".

In post 2374, Battle Mage wrote:as i say, i'm comfortable believing you're town and just not being able to see past your personal feelings towards Haschel on this one. i've been there too.

But I don't have any out-of-game beef with Haschel? Where is that coming from?

In post 2380, Akarin wrote:

In post 2370, Battle Mage wrote:is Haschel's sole-minded focus on Titus any worse than Titus' sole-minded focus on me? I think not, therefore I think Titus is the play for you.

I think they really

are

different. Titus has talked about other stuff and seems apathetic about the game overall. Haschel's only other posts about anything else were like a 1-off question to Flea about DGB and otherwise, despite not posting much he's been very emphatic and seemingly passionate, just busy IRL (I presume).

Like that heat at me I'm seeing from Haschel isn't coming from Titus and I think that's a pretty key difference here.

why would Titus have heat at you? You're doing everything you can to save her?

In post 2383, Battle Mage wrote:why would Titus have heat at you? You're doing everything you can to save her?

Do you get that it's really difficult to take this as a good-faith effort at communication on your part?

not all personal feelings are oog, but cakez seems dedicated to make me out to be like that

@MC - I think that our best bet is to elim.
I think giving out all our whereabouts was not a good strategy for a task win.
I've been over this several times at this point.
@BM - nah, akarin asked about pooky and I responded.
Good job reading the thread.

In post 2345, Taly wrote:

Haschel

, do you have any other reads?

Yes.

Titus bad, Flea bad, Murdercat not great. Blitzo is also not great; there's a lack of pressuring and follow-through from him that hits me the wrong way. I also don't want to OMGUS but portraying my last post as "only showing up when my neck is on the line" is either disingenuous or ignorant of how time zones work. Battle Mage town, you town, DGB town. Everyone else hasn't really registered too much other than the mass-claim debacle.

In post 2382, Akarin wrote:

In post 2374, Battle Mage wrote:as i say, i'm comfortable believing you're town and just not being able to see past your personal feelings towards Haschel on this one. i've been there too.

But I don't have any out-of-game beef with Haschel? Where is that coming from?

I didn't say 'out of game'. You said earlier you were upset he didn't respond to a case you made, and that you didn't necessarily like him. Separately, you acknowledged your attack on him was partially motivated by that personal animosity.

In post 2386, Blitzo wrote:@MC - I think that our best bet is to elim.
I think giving out all our whereabouts was not a good strategy for a task win.
I've been over this several times at this point.
@BM - nah, akarin asked about pooky and I responded.
Good job reading the thread.

lol dude, a bit rich criticising me for reading, when all your posts are complaining that nothing makes sense.

Actually TGP's reaction of voting me after my rebuttal without addressing any of it also doesn't look great but again I want to reread to make sure I'm not OMGUSing. I will say it looks very opportunistic though.

where you going tonight man?

There will be multiple people there with me assuming the rest of you follow the spreadsheet.

50 minutes day end

UNVOTE:

If I don't vote in the next 25 minutes consider this a no lim vote.

man i hope it's electrical. need some sanity in there lol

taly, gamma and blitzo have all said they would lim Titus. let's see who puts up...

In post 2388, Battle Mage wrote:You said earlier you were upset he didn't respond to a case you made, and that you didn't necessarily like him. Separately, you acknowledged your attack on him was partially motivated by that personal animosity.

VOTE: Titus
Taly unvoting is equivalent to someone else voting Titus for my ends

I feel like BM is deliberately antagonizing me now.
Anyways.
@Gamma - how exactly?

In post 2392, Haschel Cedricson wrote:There will be multiple people there with me assuming the rest of you follow the spreadsheet.

given this post, a good chunk of the reasoning to lim HC is rather undercut