Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:12 pm
UNVOTE:
The plot thickens.
The plot thickens.
Well we’re certainly not going to agree on this.In post 2374, Bypasser Catcher wrote:im more trustworthy of people who scumread nero after the stupid fakeclaim bullshit they pulled. cuz town perspective 100% sees that shit as scumfuck shit.
idgaf how u twist it u dont get to discredit anyone pushing the nero lim just for pushing nero cause there were valid reasons for it. to toss someone's towniness away just cause u didnt like the wagon they pushed is absurd.
the early votes are more likely to be scum. luca im reconsidering bc of their meta shit they pushed but otherwise idgi
Maybe BC thinks it's a crumbed result?
This just completely ignores the reality that multiple votes came in based on bad meta logic, and before Nero had had a chance to do all the things you’re implying are game throwing.In post 2377, Andresvmb wrote:Well we’re certainly not going to agree on this.In post 2374, Bypasser Catcher wrote:im more trustworthy of people who scumread nero after the stupid fakeclaim bullshit they pulled. cuz town perspective 100% sees that shit as scumfuck shit.
idgaf how u twist it u dont get to discredit anyone pushing the nero lim just for pushing nero cause there were valid reasons for it. to toss someone's towniness away just cause u didnt like the wagon they pushed is absurd.
the early votes are more likely to be scum. luca im reconsidering bc of their meta shit they pushed but otherwise idgi
etymonline.org wrote:bed (n.)
Old Englishbedd"bed, couch, resting place; garden plot," from Proto-Germanic*badja-"sleeping place dug in the ground" (source also of Old Frisian, Old Saxonbed, Middle Dutchbedde, Old Norsebeðr, Old High Germanbetti, GermanBett, Gothicbadi"bed"), sometimes said to be from PIE root*bhedh-"to dig, pierce" (source also of Hittitebeda-"to pierce, prick," Greekbothyros"pit," Latinfossa"ditch," Lithuanianbedu, besti"to dig," Bretonbez"grave"). But Boutkan doubts this and writes, "there is little reason to assume that the Gmc. peoples (still) lived under such primitive circumstances that they dug out their places to sleep."
Both the sleeping and gardening senses are found in Old English; the specific application to planting is found also in Middle High German and is the only sense of Danishbed. Meaning "bottom of a lake, sea, or watercourse" is from 1580s. Geological sense of "a thick layer, stratum" is from 1680s.
"in bed and at the table" (early 13c.) was a term in old law applied to conjugal duties of man and wife; it also could mean "meals and lodging, room and board" (mid-15c.).Bed and boardin reference to overnight accommodations is from 1838; as a noun, in reference to a place offering such, by 1967.Bed-and-breakfast
You can try and make the argument that the odds of getting that right were 1%, but it’s just false. Because Gamma, Ranny and I are not all Scum together. Yet multiple players came out against the wagon there.In post 2381, Bypasser Catcher wrote:i was like 99% sure nero was flipping scum there and was in lolcat mode.
shame i didnt consider the angle that someone was just tossing the game against their wincon.
How does this fit your g-cube titus read?
You think 11 players in a large voted Town out D1 quickly, some with bad logic, and it was completely pure with the Scum only white knighting? Is this a serious argument? Because you sound ridiculous right now.In post 2384, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’ve seen pure town wagons on town with scum all white knighting.
Assuming a wagon is filled to the brim with scum just because they flipped town is like Dkkoba says, just stupid.
i said from my point of view.In post 2387, Andresvmb wrote:You can try and make the argument that the odds of getting that right were 1%, but it’s just false. Because Gamma, Ranny and I are not all Scum together. Yet multiple players came out against the wagon there.In post 2381, Bypasser Catcher wrote:i was like 99% sure nero was flipping scum there and was in lolcat mode.
shame i didnt consider the angle that someone was just tossing the game against their wincon.
So you think there’s Scum on the wagon, but all I’m doing is discrediting? You know you can’t have it both ways right?In post 2388, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not saying it is btw. There surely was scum on the Nero wagon, but these discredits r bad.
Are you defending the meta logic now? Why? It was bad. That’s the point.In post 2392, Bypasser Catcher wrote:IT WASNT FUCKING BAD LOGIC
I’m not saying one is unquestionably true. I just find it bad how you seem to shade all voters on the wagon.In post 2394, Andresvmb wrote:So you think there’s Scum on the wagon, but all I’m doing is discrediting? You know you can’t have it both ways right?In post 2388, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not saying it is btw. There surely was scum on the Nero wagon, but these discredits r bad.
I haven’t shaded all the voters on the wagon. Like what are you talking about.In post 2398, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not saying one is unquestionably true. I just find it bad how you seem to shade all voters on the wagon.In post 2394, Andresvmb wrote:So you think there’s Scum on the wagon, but all I’m doing is discrediting? You know you can’t have it both ways right?In post 2388, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not saying it is btw. There surely was scum on the Nero wagon, but these discredits r bad.