Page 96 of 194

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:12 pm
by NorwegianboyEE
UNVOTE:

The plot thickens.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:12 pm
by Bypasser Catcher
i refuse to believe that nero is some good player after the shit they pulled lmfao

good players dont gamethrow

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:12 pm
by Andresvmb
In post 2374, Bypasser Catcher wrote:im more trustworthy of people who scumread nero after the stupid fakeclaim bullshit they pulled. cuz town perspective 100% sees that shit as scumfuck shit.

idgaf how u twist it u dont get to discredit anyone pushing the nero lim just for pushing nero cause there were valid reasons for it. to toss someone's towniness away just cause u didnt like the wagon they pushed is absurd.

the early votes are more likely to be scum. luca im reconsidering bc of their meta shit they pushed but otherwise idgi
Well we’re certainly not going to agree on this.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:13 pm
by DrippingGoofball
In post 2363, Vaxkiller wrote:
In post 2360, Bypasser Catcher wrote:oh im seeing whats going on

VOTE: titus
uh i dont
Maybe BC thinks it's a crumbed result?

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:13 pm
by Titus
VOTE: Norfolkboy

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:13 pm
by Vaxkiller
ARgh!

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:13 pm
by Bypasser Catcher
i was like 99% sure nero was flipping scum there and was in lolcat mode.

shame i didnt consider the angle that someone was just tossing the game against their wincon.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:14 pm
by Andresvmb
In post 2377, Andresvmb wrote:
In post 2374, Bypasser Catcher wrote:im more trustworthy of people who scumread nero after the stupid fakeclaim bullshit they pulled. cuz town perspective 100% sees that shit as scumfuck shit.

idgaf how u twist it u dont get to discredit anyone pushing the nero lim just for pushing nero cause there were valid reasons for it. to toss someone's towniness away just cause u didnt like the wagon they pushed is absurd.

the early votes are more likely to be scum. luca im reconsidering bc of their meta shit they pushed but otherwise idgi
Well we’re certainly not going to agree on this.
This just completely ignores the reality that multiple votes came in based on bad meta logic, and before Nero had had a chance to do all the things you’re implying are game throwing.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:14 pm
by Mizzytastic
*looks at time*
I'm totally gonna go to sleep after this I promise...

etymonline.org wrote:
bed (n.)


Old English
bedd
"bed, couch, resting place; garden plot," from Proto-Germanic
*badja-
"sleeping place dug in the ground" (source also of Old Frisian, Old Saxon
bed
, Middle Dutch
bedde
, Old Norse
beðr
, Old High German
betti
, German
Bett
, Gothic
badi
"bed"), sometimes said to be from PIE root
*bhedh-
"to dig, pierce" (source also of Hittite
beda-
"to pierce, prick," Greek
bothyros
"pit," Latin
fossa
"ditch," Lithuanian
bedu, besti
"to dig," Breton
bez
"grave"). But Boutkan doubts this and writes, "there is little reason to assume that the Gmc. peoples (still) lived under such primitive circumstances that they dug out their places to sleep."

Both the sleeping and gardening senses are found in Old English; the specific application to planting is found also in Middle High German and is the only sense of Danish
bed
. Meaning "bottom of a lake, sea, or watercourse" is from 1580s. Geological sense of "a thick layer, stratum" is from 1680s.

Bed and board
"in bed and at the table" (early 13c.) was a term in old law applied to conjugal duties of man and wife; it also could mean "meals and lodging, room and board" (mid-15c.).
Bed-and-breakfast
in reference to overnight accommodations is from 1838; as a noun, in reference to a place offering such, by 1967.
Official Votecount 2.1Norfolk Boy1 (3): Not_Mafia, DrippingGoofball, Titus
[E-7]

Titus (2): chkflip, Bypasser Catcher
quiet (1): Andresvmb

Not Voting (12): Vaxkiller, Momrangal, quiet, Rannygazoo, Luca Blight, Binatog13, Norfolk Boy1, NorwegianboyEE, Gamma Emerald, BBMolla, PlusJOYED, Hayker

With 18 players alive, it takes 10 votes to achieve an elimination.

Day 2 will end in (expired on 2021-01-25 03:05:00).

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:14 pm
by NorwegianboyEE
I’ve seen pure town wagons on town with scum all white knighting.
Assuming a wagon is filled to the brim with scum just because they flipped town is like Dkkoba says, just stupid.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:14 pm
by Vaxkiller
I think N-M is fucking with us.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:15 pm
by chkflip
I DON'T.

VOTE: Norfolk Boy1

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:15 pm
by Andresvmb
In post 2381, Bypasser Catcher wrote:i was like 99% sure nero was flipping scum there and was in lolcat mode.

shame i didnt consider the angle that someone was just tossing the game against their wincon.
You can try and make the argument that the odds of getting that right were 1%, but it’s just false. Because Gamma, Ranny and I are not all Scum together. Yet multiple players came out against the wagon there.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:15 pm
by NorwegianboyEE
I’m not saying it is btw. There surely was scum on the Nero wagon, but these discredits r bad.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:16 pm
by Vaxkiller
In post 2386, chkflip wrote:I DON'T.

VOTE: Norfolk Boy1
How does this fit your g-cube titus read?

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:16 pm
by Andresvmb
In post 2384, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’ve seen pure town wagons on town with scum all white knighting.
Assuming a wagon is filled to the brim with scum just because they flipped town is like Dkkoba says, just stupid.
You think 11 players in a large voted Town out D1 quickly, some with bad logic, and it was completely pure with the Scum only white knighting? Is this a serious argument? Because you sound ridiculous right now.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:17 pm
by Bypasser Catcher
In post 2387, Andresvmb wrote:
In post 2381, Bypasser Catcher wrote:i was like 99% sure nero was flipping scum there and was in lolcat mode.

shame i didnt consider the angle that someone was just tossing the game against their wincon.
You can try and make the argument that the odds of getting that right were 1%, but it’s just false. Because Gamma, Ranny and I are not all Scum together. Yet multiple players came out against the wagon there.
i said from my point of view.

not sure i said anyone else.

how many ppl came out against the wagon after i presented my case wrt their tracker claim?

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:17 pm
by Bypasser Catcher
IT WASNT FUCKING BAD LOGIC

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:17 pm
by NorwegianboyEE
N_M could be lying too so i’d like to give it some thought and see Norfolks reaction. But we’re definitely eliminating in those slots today.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:17 pm
by Andresvmb
In post 2388, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not saying it is btw. There surely was scum on the Nero wagon, but these discredits r bad.
So you think there’s Scum on the wagon, but all I’m doing is discrediting? You know you can’t have it both ways right?

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:17 pm
by Bypasser Catcher
just ufcking acknowledge nero was playing against their wincon lmfao

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:18 pm
by Andresvmb
In post 2392, Bypasser Catcher wrote:IT WASNT FUCKING BAD LOGIC
Are you defending the meta logic now? Why? It was bad. That’s the point.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:18 pm
by chkflip
I'm following Titus and I feel like Nero would follow a guilty track. Otherwise I'm uncertain what you mean. (Titus and I will surely VCA later, don't you worry.)

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:19 pm
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 2394, Andresvmb wrote:
In post 2388, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not saying it is btw. There surely was scum on the Nero wagon, but these discredits r bad.
So you think there’s Scum on the wagon, but all I’m doing is discrediting? You know you can’t have it both ways right?
I’m not saying one is unquestionably true. I just find it bad how you seem to shade all voters on the wagon.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:20 pm
by Andresvmb
In post 2398, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 2394, Andresvmb wrote:
In post 2388, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not saying it is btw. There surely was scum on the Nero wagon, but these discredits r bad.
So you think there’s Scum on the wagon, but all I’m doing is discrediting? You know you can’t have it both ways right?
I’m not saying one is unquestionably true. I just find it bad how you seem to shade all voters on the wagon.
I haven’t shaded all the voters on the wagon. Like what are you talking about.