Mafiascum.net

You said you vote Three because of the race for lim...
But u didnt vote t3 when it was good time for that and was in top with votes...
You are lying monkey

In post 2374, Wiki wrote:

In post 2289, Almost50 wrote:

In post 2274, Wiki wrote:Wait what
Almost50 scumread: t3, wiki, gera, dorsey.
Why do you vote Three now?

Do you see ANY of them 4 in the race for lim?

That was MY stance, not YOURS.

In post 2373, Almost50 wrote:Blames me for not sticking to my SR with only Ico voting with me, but refuses to vote t3 because only Selynee is voting there.

I already voted there, this wagon died, when andre decided to vote three, what are you talking about, are you drunk?

In post 2305, Datisi wrote:

In post 2302, Looker wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 2257, Datisi wrote:2041really? the "wow, you were on almost every leading wagon so far" isn't supposed to be carrying any negative connotations?

• Is your assertion that I am...
  
• Accusing you of something you are doing?
  
• Accusing you of something you are not doing?

• If you...
  
• are
  NOT
  doing it: Can't you just show that you're not doing it?
  
• ARE
  doing it: Can't you show that what you're doing benefits town if you're town?

I don't understand the "negative connotations" and "bad faith" arguments if what I'm referring to is factual.

yes, i was obviously on those wagons. framing it the way you did, it's showing off the fact i was on the wagons and it's leaving it open for others to draw the most simplistic conclusion from it, that being on a lot of wagons bad because trying to score misyeet. it's not looking at the possibility of me voting those players because i wanted to pressure or read them, it's just stating facts without context hoping i get scumread for them.

I didn't frame it, I questioned it, but the more you misrepresent this questioning as accusation, the more I sense you feel guilty about your actions. Instead of saying "I did x, y, and z for town", you're going "Why do you keep bringing up I did x, y, and z?", even after you said the way to find scum is to examine for inconsistencies within x's, y's, and z's - you contradict yourself.

In post 2321, Wiki wrote:Looker,
please give any thoughts about players before the night. I mean now

In post 2328, Three wrote:I'm never going to understand this site meta. Punish townies who scum hunt and protect scum who act polite. Fucking bonkers mind set.

I think they want to be liked more than they want to be right. I feel scum is leaning heavily on your wagon, though.

People who have been paying attention: is there a list of people wiki has accused and not accused?

Scums

In post 2380, Dwlee99 wrote:People who have been paying attention: is there a list of people wiki has accused and not accused?

Accused: EVERYONE

Not Accused: No One

So Almost...
It seems you didnt vote T3 for long time he had 2-3 votes, and Wiki had only 1 yours.
Ico added +1 vote to Wiki not before, but after Andre unvoting from T3.
It means you dont want to elim your scummies in this game.
But when you saw an opportunity to vote Three with people, you did it, though he is not in your poe.

Fortunately that vote doesnt count...

I will talk with you the whole weekend, prepare yourself

In post 2379, Looker wrote:

In post 2321, Wiki wrote:Looker,
please give any thoughts about players before the night. I mean now

Spoiler:

In post 2046, geraintm wrote:no.

Actually, I will. It won't necessarily be alignment-indicative, but I think it'll help so people won't think I'm teasing them or personally dislike them.

• Three - Is bait, screaming into the void
  
• Andres - Gave up, he's sick
  
• Ico - Is Datisi's lap dog/foot soldier/whatever respectable, dignified term for minion
  
• Salsabil - The expectations I placed on her were too high
  
• Geraintm - Is dead
  
• Wiki - I don't think English is his first language, so it's difficult for me to understand a lot of his posts
  
• Almost50 - Vanished
  
• T3 - Just trying to stay alive, so is relatively quiet
  
• Dorsey - Hates all of you and doesn't want to be here
  
• Seylnee - Has better things to do
  
• Dwlee - Does not care/Is lost
  
• Datisi - Responds to me when I talk to him, even when I point out inconsistencies in his play.

As much as I think Datisi is scum, if he dies, I won't have anyone to talk to.

So what should I do with my vote, Looker?

ugh

In post 1, ChaosOmega wrote:You are a Townie.

In post 2154, Three wrote:I'm VT.

Is it worth thinking about?

In post 2386, Looker wrote: [*]Geraintm - Is dead
.

No no he's not dead, he's, he's restin'!

In post 2362, T3 wrote:i feel like three might be town but i have no evidence to back that up
objectively i think he's scum though

Objectively, that's how I feel most of the time. But as I don't trust you, I feel like you could be trying to be be deliberately wishy washy here

In post 2389, Wiki wrote:

In post 1, ChaosOmega wrote:You are a Townie.

In post 2154, Three wrote:I'm VT.

Is it worth thinking about?

No.

Sely, should I end this now? (put on E-1)

Can't really trust him. And T3 isn't happening.

VOTE: Three

E-1.

I'M JAILER

Sel you just plummeted in my reads again.

I dont trust you because of this. If you are townie PR you understand, that voting Wiki you are risking to get Wiki's vote to you because of that. Moreover Wiki was town lean for you and with no reason Wiki became scum for you, for protecting you.

In post 2344, Three wrote:Can you stop cherrypicking my ISO?

VOTE: Wiki

You claimed VT...

Fine, fine, I'll play by the rules

UNVOTE: Three

I scumread Datisi, scumread T3. I was looking for their partners. And you with no reason decided to vote me, risking to get my vote in you. PR wouldnt do that.

I'm so fucking tired of getting shit pushed, I can't even use my PR because town has the funkiest criteria for what's scummy that I've ever seen!