Mafiascum.net

In post 2372, Andante wrote:VOTE: umlaut

umlaut is maf

Is Eyes still my partner or did you change your mind about that part?

In post 2328, Stephen A Smith wrote:should i hammer now i'm so bored

this is a pretty noncommittal response to a claimed guilty, also a really strange priority when -

In post 2329, Stephen A Smith wrote:duckie give it to me straight, this is 100 % mech guilty?

- this is his second thought

scum know that a guilty on town is not a guilty; it's pretty unintuitive to fake not ebing aware of this. it's actually pretty instinctual to try and look good around a townie driving a miselim on a townie. his not joining the wagon but talking around it is an alarm bell, and i struggle to believe this order of posts is coming from someone who is actually genuinely curious about the legitimacy of the guilty.

it reads more like someone who's like "hm i shouldn't vote this because it'll hit green, oh but i guess in that case i should be sceptical about it" and it's makin my skin all crawly

In post 2346, Stephen A Smith wrote:

In post 2333, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 2328, Stephen A Smith wrote:should i hammer now i'm so bored

hammer your sucm parnter, do it

if this was my scum partner I would've already hammered

: /

In post 2347, Stephen A Smith wrote:

In post 2343, fireisredsir wrote:duck is there any way eyes can be VT here given the information you have? there shouldn't be any ambiguity, either it's possible or it isn't

I want a 100% answer from duck about the quality of the mechanical information

for the record fire's question actually looks like sincere curiosity about the result!
stephen's "i want a 100% answer" is again trending away from sincerely reacting to the result, and more heavily towards that instinctive pull towards doubting the sincerity of it (scum TMI instinct).

In post 2350, Stephen A Smith wrote:I don't give a shit about your role

I want you to say whether eyes is 100% guranteed scum or not

atp i'd answered twice that it wasn't an explicit guilty (i was hinting that i'm following what i think someone else is hinting, though admittedly i'm doing so obtusely) and stephen had missed both of those mentions. this again feels like someone who's trying to end up on the right side of history rather than someone who's sincerely reacting to something.

are you changing your mind on whether eyes is guilty or what

duckie if you think eyes is town maybe stop trolling and help us kill actual scum like nero thx

In post 2364, the worst wrote:VOTE: stephen

i'm p sure someone else is hinting at a guilty on eyes but i don't really think eyes is scum

In post 2365, the worst wrote:sorry for holding the game hostage for a minute there

umlaut is maf

: ]


pedit: antante, why?

umlaut has been playing this game too safe... and having significantly less posts than the next lowest is confirming it in my mind. Also, gut told me surye maf

Also this is self meta so feel free not to believe me but I 100% do not play games with you if I see 1 townie claiming a mech-guilty on another townie because I'm not a moron.

If I'm scum and eyes/duck are town I 100% lol-hammer eyes as soon as he's in range and then blame it on duckie tomm.

I don't do some stupid song and dance with duck because that's ineffective and a waste of time and town on 2 mislims with a scapegoat like duckie is pretty much done at D3 most of the time.

duck if you're town and claiming a fake mech guilty on another town on d2 perhaps you should re-examine how you play mafia games because your shitty fake claim gets eyes to flip town here and you're town you're like almost 100% making this game unwinnable and I don't really feel like wasting time on some shit like that.

duck is no longer claiming a mech guilty, and now TRs the person the guilty was on

yes i noticed

i can agree with 2357 and 2359 but I think if they /were/ real(which we know now to be false ), they would attempt to scumcase eyes a bit more imo

In post 2382, Andante wrote:umlaut has been playing this game too safe... and having significantly less posts than the next lowest is confirming it in my mind. Also, gut told me surye maf

Hm, the Umulat case is starting to grow on me, but i still think hes likely town lol

like idk, stephen/scorp semes palatable, barely seen any interaction between these 2

VOTE: Scorp

ahh ok I think I see what you're saying now!! my bad!! I'm kinda only half reading, Stephen, you want Nero here? I can abandon my Umlaut SR for a nero vote. Nero had gotten significantly worse as the game has gone on

In post 2387, HockeyFan wrote:like idk, stephen/scorp semes palatable, barely seen any interaction between these 2

why does only stephen/scorp interaction matter? I think stephen is town

i have always wanted to kill nero

it matters because in my head it makes them more likely to be scum

In post 2388, Andante wrote:ahh ok I think I see what you're saying now!! my bad!! I'm kinda only half reading, Stephen, you want Nero here? I can abandon my Umlaut SR for a nero vote. Nero had gotten significantly worse as the game has gone on

???

Tell me how Nero has gotten worse.

In post 2392, Umlaut wrote:

In post 2388, Andante wrote:ahh ok I think I see what you're saying now!! my bad!! I'm kinda only half reading, Stephen, you want Nero here? I can abandon my Umlaut SR for a nero vote. Nero had gotten significantly worse as the game has gone on

???

Tell me how Nero has gotten worse.

You think Nero's game has gotten better? Please explain more on that...

VOTE: Nero

In post 2390, Stephen A Smith wrote:i have always wanted to kill nero

rude

andante on d1, didnt want the nero wagon to go through, TR nero, but voted nero anyways cuz she wanted to sheep frozen(lasted like 5 mins) Suddenly is ok with yeeting nero in 1953 and then SRS nero again cuz she didnt like the nero wagon, but she was one the advcoated against the wagon, and that nero is town, posts 2037 because lmao??? 2143, again is just ???

and now is again advocating for nero

jesus, what is this read progression of nero from andante LOL, like ??? how do u read this, im inclined to scumlean this but its confirmation bias likely, but yea the read progression on nero from andante is very ....(not good)

hockey what do you think of nero's alignment? scum or not scum go

I doubt its conf bias. She doesn't even have a reason.

In post 2396, Stephen A Smith wrote:hockey what do you think of nero's alignment? scum or not scum go

not scum

In post 2397, Nero Cain wrote:I doubt its conf bias. She doesn't even have a reason.

i was talking about my read on andante