In post 2401, macmollie wrote:I haven't done a crash and burn yet as town on this site but I am so there.
That alone proves that whatever you do will be fake.
of course it does cos it supports whatever theory about my meta you can concoct! or my reactions for that matter.
moar votes on me plz
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:02 am
by FakeGod
@Serra: Thanks for the links. Although I wouldn't call wait 20 min really "not letting mantis wagon going through", you certainly did show restraint in hammering right away.
Your point would be more pronounced if this had happened closer to deadline, since perhaps scum_serra would indeed have "let the mantis wagon go through" if it meant pressure off scum_nati.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:05 am
by macmollie
fg plz vote me tia
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:09 am
by Wisdom
The signs were there, but I ignored them because of my confidence that you are town.
- Your reluctance to support a penguin lynch, but having no problem switching to Huntress when given the chance.
- Your continuous paranoia of Mantis despite her being bleeding town at points.
- Your wanting to replace out when Mac got offended, when we've more or less figured the game out and it wouldn't hurt you to stay in the game - as scum however you'd want to do this, especially since your scumbuddies are mostly caught.
But in the end you went and did way more obvious things;
- Making a huge deal out of Bert not remembering a detail irrelevant to this game, and actually starting to doubt your read on him, all when you know exactly how Bert is.
- Lying about my meta and accusing me of bussing, like you're playing with me for the first time. I should be bleeding obvtown for you at this point, yet you get "paranoid" about me when I finally decide to give in and vote who my townreads are voting.
- And then overreacting to the accusations on you, just like caught scum does when they think everything goes right and suddenly everything turns around.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:11 am
by FakeGod
M&M case looks heavily based on meta. I don't know their meta and I previously read the slot as townish.
However, I have a question to M&M about their reaction. Specifically, posts 2401 and 2403 and similar ones, where m&m yells for more votes and etc.
@M&M: You mentioned that I was scummy for using aTe back when I replaced in, in posts 1856 and 1858, etc. I still don't think I was appealing to any emotions there, but my actions that you accused me of are being mirrored by you in your 2401 and 2403, etc.
Can you justify your latest posts? Wouldn't they be classified as scummy "aTe" according to your own definitions?
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:12 am
by Wisdom
Add
- Your many "unsure" reads, when you usually have a read on everyone at this point of the game, be it right or wrong, and being stubborn as you are you defend these reads to the death. Yet here you're unsure about everyone.
to those.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:13 am
by macmollie
yes wis
that is exactly what happened. bet money fg agrees with you.
OH FG PLZ VOTE MEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:15 am
by FakeGod
Assume that you're town and playing toward your win con.
When I replaced in, you gave a reason for finding me scummy. (apparently I was using aTe in a certain way)
Then, why should you now engage in the same behavior, (using similar aTe) if you believe that's what scums do?
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:17 am
by macmollie
In post 2407, FakeGod wrote:M&M case looks heavily based on meta. I don't know their meta and I previously read the slot as townish.
However, I have a question to M&M about their reaction. Specifically, posts 2401 and 2403 and similar ones, where m&m yells for more votes and etc.
@M&M: You mentioned that I was scummy for using aTe back when I replaced in, in posts 1856 and 1858, etc. I still don't think I was appealing to any emotions there, but my actions that you accused me of are being mirrored by you in your 2401 and 2403, etc.
Can you justify your latest posts? Wouldn't they be classified as scummy "aTe" according to your own definitions?
when I reread your posts through a more beep boop lens I realised that you devaluing yourself was a vt claim so it made sense in that context.
of course those posts are scummy cos I am caught scum. just ask wisdom he is the expert.
eta: I am the aTe queen.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:18 am
by Wisdom
So now you're annoyed that I am scumreading you? Shouldn't you be thinking that I am scum?
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:20 am
by macmollie
I am reaffirming your awsumness at meta reading me. why are you complaining?
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:23 am
by Wisdom
Not complaining, just pointing out how obvious you make it that you're scum. If you were town annoyed at how wrongly I meta you, you would be assuming I am doing it on purpose because I am scum.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:27 am
by macmollie
In post 2414, Wisdom wrote:Not complaining, just pointing out how obvious you make it that you're scum. If you were town annoyed at how wrongly I meta you, you would be assuming I am doing it on purpose because I am scum.
I thought I already did that.
oooooohhhhh fgggggg where is your vote?
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:27 am
by FakeGod
@M&M: Wisdom is my strongest townread; that doesn't make him right.
What I'm alarmed at is your inconsistent play.
Please explain.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:28 am
by Wisdom
Nope, that's not what you're doing, mollie.
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:32 am
by macmollie
In post 2416, FakeGod wrote:@M&M: Wisdom is my strongest townread; that doesn't make him right.