Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:44 am
jesus fucking christ that was draining
You never did this, Zed!In post 850, Zdenek wrote:I can't say now. I will as soon as I can.
Why?In post 1330, Zdenek wrote:When you do, you'll realize that I am obviously town.
Why?In post 1419, Zdenek wrote:Eh, Goat on a Raft is still scum,
Who's saying that? The quickhammer didn't seem remarkable to me.In post 2318, Zdenek wrote:I'm really confused about why so many people are saying thinks like Spyrex is bad, but LOL we can forgive him, vote someone else.
It's making me nervous.
The Messiah case may look better on paper but in terms of intensity of feeling, I feel much more positive about SpyreX flipping scum than Messiah currently.In post 2385, Shadoweh wrote:Come on ooba, just admit your Messiah case is better and stop joining the hammer outrage, it makes you look bad in general.
Wow this is awful. Can you explain HOW spyrex totally could be and probably still is scum? You haven't actually presented anything saying why you think Spy is scummy except "he wouldn't have hammered in such a boring way." (So far as I can see, if I'm missing something, please point it out.) Even your gigantic post is full of nothing but townreads, with a bit tacked at the end that says "I'd lynch these three dudes but I ain't tellin' you why."In post 2386, Nautilius wrote:It's a nulltell but SpyreX could still totally be (and probably is) scum. I don't mind riding stupid hammer rage to kill a hard to lynch SpyreX-scum.
do not believe either of my town reads on them were wrong. ill have to reevaluate ben at some point but we havent hit that point yet.In post 2382, Nautilius wrote:How are you feeling about these two reads at the moment?In post 801, kanyeknowsbest wrote:benmage, peacebringer
ty 4 those posts nacho. im hpapy 2 talk about abt pbringer ne timeIn post 2382, Nautilius wrote:How are you feeling about these two reads at the moment?In post 801, kanyeknowsbest wrote:benmage, peacebringer
This is appalling. What's the problem with Townhunting? And what's your problem with Nautilius's handling of SpyreX when YOU were pushing SpyreX as well?In post 2404, quadz08 wrote:Wow this is awful. Can you explain HOW spyrex totally could be and probably still is scum? You haven't actually presented anything saying why you think Spy is scummy except "he wouldn't have hammered in such a boring way." (So far as I can see, if I'm missing something, please point it out.) Even your gigantic post is full of nothing but townreads, with a bit tacked at the end that says "I'd lynch these three dudes but I ain't tellin' you why."In post 2386, Nautilius wrote:It's a nulltell but SpyreX could still totally be (and probably is) scum. I don't mind riding stupid hammer rage to kill a hard to lynch SpyreX-scum.
That said, your gigantic set of posts was a decent start when taken out of the no-case-on-spyrex context, so I'm somewhat of two minds on it.
In post 2355, quadz08 wrote:Looked back and you are correct. If so, then why did Spyrex present it like AGar was using that as a case? Or did Spyrex mean that AGar presenting it as null was, in fact, scummy?In post 2316, Shadoweh wrote:What case on SD, AGar was voting ooba and said SD's list was a null-tellThis reasoning can go jump off a goddamned bridge. Unless his power is "hammer a dude or two and WIN GAME," it's not worth hammeringIn post 2316, Shadoweh wrote:Spyrex also just claimed his role interacts with hammers. He probably saw L-1, saw 'IF HAMMER = USE POWER' and thought 'I'M GOING TO VEGAS'.someone you cannot possibly have a read on.this post is so awful. I agree with the first sentence in theory, but I don't think there are actually many people saying that in practice, so it's basically "this sounds good I'll say it." The second sentence is just fucking terrible. Are the "so many people" saying that all scum? Bad bad bad. (Benmage puts it nicely when he says it's disingenuous.)In post 2318, Zdenek wrote:I'm really confused about why so many people are saying thinks like Spyrex is bad, but LOL we can forgive him, vote someone else.
It's making me nervous.
Kanye continues to be holy-shit levels of town, and his 2329 point is quite good.
AH AH AH NAUTILIUS WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR POSTING GOD AGH GET IT OFF GET IT OFF. (Seriously, you come into the thread with "x and y are town, oh and z wants to be town? sure she's town too" andnothing else? no fuck that
VOTE: NautClarify for me if you thought AGar was calling SD scum or null with what you quoted, please.In post 2347, SpyreX wrote:In what universe is that case on SD 'perfectly valid'? There are some who were on him that were more legit than others, but parroting the volume of scum reads as some kind of magic tell sarcasm font isn't it. I didn't even blink an eye at it catching up.
I'm not 'justifying' it. I had reasons but even if I didn't I probably would have taken it - I'm just sayin after the fact I dont feel bad about it. If it was some kind of really bad wagon I shot through I'd have felt bad, at least. It is what it is. Replace into a hammer early? I'm takin it almost every time. This time it was just even more perfect.
Also, show me examples of you taking that opportunity in the past, or expressing willingness to do so. Forgive me if I don't just take your word for it.
oh christ Cephrir's 2348 is just fucking awful. I will be watching that one with interest.
...huh-huh. Yeah, this is terrible.In post 2404, quadz08 wrote:Wow this is awful. Can you explain HOW spyrex totally could be and probably still is scum? You haven't actually presented anything saying why you think Spy is scummy except "he wouldn't have hammered in such a boring way." (So far as I can see, if I'm missing something, please point it out.) Even your gigantic post is full of nothing but townreads, with a bit tacked at the end that says "I'd lynch these three dudes but I ain't tellin' you why."In post 2386, Nautilius wrote:It's a nulltell but SpyreX could still totally be (and probably is) scum. I don't mind riding stupid hammer rage to kill a hard to lynch SpyreX-scum.
That said, your gigantic set of posts was a decent start when taken out of the no-case-on-spyrex context, so I'm somewhat of two minds on it.
Everyone is a power role, that's a stupid distinction to make. Running people up until their claimed power isn't cool enough doesn't work in role madness. >_> You're saying we should have waited for the claim, obviously yes. All those reasons the hammer was awful still don't matter because they wouldn't stop someone trolling for hammers. It's still impossible for a town-Spy to have known he was hammering town, so it's not a fair point to hold against someone.In post 2388, Messiah Complex wrote:To whit: Spy isn't scumbecausehe hammered, he's scum because his hammer deprived the town of: setup information via Amrun's claim, Amrun's now-confirmed-town final reads, and most importantly, the potential for us to havenot lynched town yesterday because Arya was probably a power role and few (if any) were actually interested in lynching Amrun to begin with.
Sticking your head in the sand and screaming "NULL!!!!!!!!!!!" is seriously missing the point.
- Des
There is no problem with Townhunting; the problem is with the complete lack of scumhunting (and the scumreads were not presented as PoE either). And what, because he's voting for Spyrex, he's automatically immune from suspicion from me? That's ridiculous, but it's the only way I can parse your second sentence, so if you meant something else, please clarify.In post 2410, Tierce wrote:This is appalling. What's the problem with Townhunting? And what's your problem with Nautilius's handling of SpyreX when YOU were pushing SpyreX as well?
Early game townhunting only is very much a thing, and if you don't see scumhunting in there you may need your head examined. Not having a clear opinion on that spate of Naut posts is strange.In post 2404, quadz08 wrote:Wow this is awful. Can you explain HOW spyrex totally could be and probably still is scum? You haven't actually presented anything saying why you think Spy is scummy except "he wouldn't have hammered in such a boring way." (So far as I can see, if I'm missing something, please point it out.) Even your gigantic post is full of nothing but townreads, with a bit tacked at the end that says "I'd lynch these three dudes but I ain't tellin' you why."In post 2386, Nautilius wrote:It's a nulltell but SpyreX could still totally be (and probably is) scum. I don't mind riding stupid hammer rage to kill a hard to lynch SpyreX-scum.
That said, your gigantic set of posts was a decent start when taken out of the no-case-on-spyrex context, so I'm somewhat of two minds on it.
I don't know why Naut thinks you're third party but this argument only makes me suspect he's correct. Tossing "paranoid" in here is a particularly strange thing to do seeing as paranoia is a thing that townies do. Are you really saying you're more paranoid in third party roles than town roles? If so, why?In post 2412, Shadoweh wrote: Nautcho, if I was third party you would know, I'd have already gotten myself lynched in a blaze of paranoid glory. You made all those sexy paragraphs around everyone else but all I get is a discount scum rating :<
"complete lack of scum hunting" + "gave scumreads" = does not compute. If you want expanded reasoning, you could try asking for it instead of whatever the hell this is.In post 2413, quadz08 wrote:There is no problem with Townhunting; the problem is with the complete lack of scumhunting (and the scumreads were not presented as PoE either). And what, because he's voting for Spyrex, he's automatically immune from suspicion from me? That's ridiculous, but it's the only way I can parse your second sentence, so if you meant something else, please clarify.In post 2410, Tierce wrote:This is appalling. What's the problem with Townhunting? And what's your problem with Nautilius's handling of SpyreX when YOU were pushing SpyreX as well?
This is a particularly good example of a post that is town as all hell. I cannot imagine wanting to lynch this post, from any player, ever.In post 2396, Nautilius wrote:ooba - I feel in my heart that ooba is town and I'm going to have a hell of a time letting go with it even if I go down this list and I find three more townreads.I think scum is less likely to acknowledge the case on them as "valid", especially when they have a perfectly good rebuttal.In post 1391, ooba wrote:Agar's post makes some valid sounding points.
I thought his peacebringer case was fucking great.
His idea of why SpyreX hammered is good.this seemed awesomely genuineIn post 2307, ooba wrote:I did not like how D2 ended abruptly. I wanted to take a more active role today in seeing who I want to get lynched lynched. That involves pushing cases on those I want lynched and dissuading people from other votes. If I had thought Agar's L-1 was scummy - I would have mentioned it.
this reminds me of a cephrir town tellIn post 2324, ooba wrote:I'm sorry but that's not how the game works - I will use game events and quotes as I see fit. As someone who does not have great rhetoric, if Nautilus has eloquently put why Andruis's early play was a town tell - I will use it.
i'm not sure if it applies to ooba ofc but if he was cephrir i would call this shit town
also genuine and town as fuckIn post 2358, ooba wrote:- A lot of people called Benmage town because of meta reasons. And his play neither had town nor scum vibes for me. And there were times when I thought "Those many people can't be wrong. Weak town pile?". Every single time I came close to doing that, it didn't feel right so kept him in neutral.
^this case sucks because it completely disregards the subtle ooba hints where he believes his rhetoric isn't entirely up to par^In post 1261, AGar wrote:Ooba has been generally passive, reactive and mostly concerned with his image rather than finding scum. In his first real post, he has two scum reads - quadz and kanye. He votes for one, but he makes no effort to gain traction on either wagon. A pro-town mindset would have him trying to lobby for more votes on those wagons to garner reactions, generate pressure and help divulge more from which he can gather reads from. He has repeatedly made posts which appear to deflect any attempts to garner insight into his reads, which from a town perspective makes no sense, because again - it does nothing to help gather people to your case, and thus, he once again appears to not actually care whether his wagons gain any ground, just that he has a vote cast somewhere. He's trying to make it appear as if he's involved in this game without actually being involved. He's since moved his vote to Shadoweh, who is his new main suspect, but once again done nothing to actually see if that's a viable wagon.
it also sucks because ooba has made an effort to push wagons and constantly tries to sell them even if he doesn't exaggerate with how awesome they are.
quadz's case is similar and around it there is mostly cheerleading and a horrible lack of good points.
i've come close to being tempted to take ooba out of my townreads, but after that mtgs fiasco and ooba still being town as shit i'm going double down because ooba is still quite town
I would appreciate some expansion here, I think. What's so great about 753? I'm biased on this one, but whoever said scum couldn't be confident? Especially given you just said you aren't great at reading them. I'm sure the claim is true, but I don't see why I should care- scum would want town to know a third party exists in all probability. I don't know what "deathrage" you're referring to. And what's left after that doesn't seem like enough for a townread to me.Naut wrote:Goat on a Raft:
Goat drove me crazy until something like #753 when my blind rage against him started to see the possibility of him being town. I usually can't read CDB worth a shit unless people are pushing him decently as scum, and I feel his reactions here are confident and something that's pretty unlikely from his scumgame (although on the outside edges of possibility). His claim is a hard thing to lie about (especially with Shadoweh/Syryana/Alchemist possible third party) and can lead to him getting powerlynched to shit in a lot of scenarios. I think his early reads to form strong trust townreads (nacho, what's your read on mollie? sheeping your read on Tierce.) was a good move in a subtle way, his push towards deathrage is genuine as hell, etc. Probably definitely town.
Thanks. Nothing was actually *wrong*, work just overwhelmed me (36 hours in 3 days turned into 45) due to other managers having life issues.In post 2340, Tierce wrote:AGar--when you get back, less anger, less frustration, less pointless aggression, please. Need you to be as objective as possible. Hope everything is well.
They haven't really been off-the-hip--I've been trying to think things through, and occasionally it's only after I place a vote that I realize something and/or something happens that makes me change that read.In post 2418, AGar wrote:Tierce, can you expound on that quadz vote, please? Is there more than meets the eye? (Not a dig, just your votes today have felt off-the-hip so I want to know if this one matches that profile or if you have deeper reasoning there)
First point: Nacho was replying to SpyreX's list of reads:In post 2355, quadz08 wrote:AH AH AH NAUTILIUS WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR POSTING GOD AGH GET IT OFF GET IT OFF. (Seriously, you come into the thread with "x and y are town, oh and z wants to be town? sure she's town too" andnothing else? no fuck that
VOTE: Naut
In post 2300, SpyreX wrote:Benmage
Cephrir
Garruk Relentless
Messiah Complex
quadz08
Shadoweh
Tammy
Tierce
...so Nacho doing "nothing else" doesn't really apply, as that kind of thing can be brief enough. And this very post states Nacho was rereading. quadz ignores this and attacks Nacho for the absence of more. See below, because this point has developments.In post 2341, Nautilius wrote: Tierce is town.
Shadoweh is town.
Messiahfeelsvery, very town but I need to finish a reread to be sure.
In post 2342, Tammy wrote:AHEM.
...wasIn post 2345, Nautilius wrote:and tammy's town too.
I don't want to dieIn post 2395, Nautilius wrote:Before I read on this I just want to talk about how this bothers me. He thinks mollie was killed because she was starting to coordinate the townblock and yet makes no effort to coordinate one himself?
You have got to be fucking kidding me.In post 2412, Shadoweh wrote:All those reasons the hammer was awful still don't matter because they wouldn't stop someone trolling for hammers. It's still impossible for a town-Spy to have known he was hammering town, so it's not a fair point to hold against someone.
Bullshit.In post 2420, Messiah Complex wrote:I don't want to dieIn post 2395, Nautilius wrote:Before I read on this I just want to talk about how this bothers me. He thinks mollie was killed because she was starting to coordinate the townblock and yet makes no effort to coordinate one himself?
Yes, there is scum motivation. Town do still do it, though. I'm sure I could easily produce examples of this too if I felt like it. It's not enough to lynch on. I understand there are unrelated suspicions on the slot, and that's legitimate. It's ironic that you won't brook any counterargument for lynching SpyreX when, you know, you're lynching him for lynching someone without waiting for a counterargument. And frankly I find the "here's two examples of deliberate scum quickhammers so that must be what's happeneing here" logic disingenuous.You have got to be fucking kidding me.In post 2412, Shadoweh wrote:All those reasons the hammer was awful still don't matter because they wouldn't stop someone trolling for hammers. It's still impossible for a town-Spy to have known he was hammering town, so it's not a fair point to hold against someone.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=29483
Reckoner quickhammers TWICE, gets away with it, endgames town in LYLO (A+ fakeclaim) for the W
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=30429
I quickhammer the unclaimed town BG, teammates endgame town in LYLO for the W
The bottom line is that Spyrex's hammer iswith scum motivation, and the fact that your counterargument is literally "Town still trollhammer so it's null, try harder!" is totally and completely asinine. We're lynching Spyrex today, end of story.teeming
- Des
I don't understand what this is. What do you think a townblock is and what was going through your head when you asked me these questions?In post 2421, Cephrir wrote:Also, you don't want me in your townblock because you and I are disagreeing, but you do want Stupendous, who couldn't scumhunt his way out of a paper bag? For real?
That isn't what irony is and the two situations aren't even remotely comparable.In post 2421, Cephrir wrote:Yes, there is scum motivation. Town do still do it, though. I'm sure I could easily produce examples of this too if I felt like it. It's not enough to lynch on. I understand there are unrelated suspicions on the slot, and that's legitimate.It's ironic that you won't brook any counterargument for lynching SpyreX when, you know, you're lynching him for lynching someone without waiting for a counterargument.And frankly I find the "here's two examples of deliberate scum quickhammers so that must be what's happeneing here" logic disingenuous.
Of course I can. You were in Rapture - two scum in that game replaced out under pressure. You can say that everyone plays differently, but scum follow patterns. One of them, is replacing out when they are pressured. Frankly, it's a tell that I've gotten pretty milage out of recently. Plus, there's the clear scum motivation of survival behind it, since there's always the chance that someone else will replace in and improve people's read on the slot, and town general reluctance to lynch a slot that's going to be replaced, especially early in the game when there's the hope that a new player will "clarify" the slot. It' like the out of game/IRL excuses tell - both town and scum do it, scum do it disproportionately more. In this game, we've had displaced and Spyrex in that slot, neither has done anything to make me think that it's not scum.In post 2336, Tierce wrote:And I'm pretty sure that it is. Not only do you have to take into account PeaceBringer's recent history on the site, but also that Town will often not react to being called scum as you think they should. Everyone is different. And with Town:scum proportions and the fact that replacement ratios are frankly as null as can be as seen on several attempts at analyzing replacement ratios in the post, the burden is on you to prove how are scum more likely to replace out when being called scum than Town. Everyone is always being called scum all the time, you can't pick and choose and say that your experience shows that it is scum who primarily replace out under those circumstances.In post 2335, Zdenek wrote:I'm pretty sure that it's not.In post 2334, Tierce wrote:Wrong.In post 2331, Zdenek wrote:PeaceBringer got called scum and replaced out. My experience is that do this disproportionately more often than town.
In post 2347, SpyreX wrote:In other news kkb is nostradamus per 2329 vs 2331
You should probably just vote for Spyrex.In post 2363, Alfred Borden wrote:Zdenek and Cephrir are the next two stale townreads to revisit.
1. I can't yet.In post 2401, Nautilius wrote:You never did this, Zed!In post 850, Zdenek wrote:I can't say now. I will as soon as I can.
Why?In post 1330, Zdenek wrote:When you do, you'll realize that I am obviously town.
Why?In post 1419, Zdenek wrote:Eh, Goat on a Raft is still scum,
Who's saying that? The quickhammer didn't seem remarkable to me.In post 2318, Zdenek wrote:I'm really confused about why so many people are saying thinks like Spyrex is bad, but LOL we can forgive him, vote someone else.
It's making me nervous.
Disappointing, but not remarkable.
kkb-zed scum pair seems unlikely from his iso