Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 1:48 pm**

In sign up yes. After the game starts no.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 1:56 pm**

Click Lavender's username. Check her games.

Her scum game is vastly different.

You're fucking welcome.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 2:30 pm**

VOTE: Looker

I wold rather have my vote on someone who I think may be scum rather than a LAL policy(yes NPOM, LAL meant lynch all lurkers.....though I guess in this game it is SAL).

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:18 pm**

In post 2340, chkflip wrote:I love that "I voted for scum" is still a thing people use, though.

Is killing scum not your objective?

In post 2354, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Looker:
*Dislikes NPOM's self vote
*Likes to insult people
*Very confrontational
TR: Gamma
Vote: Titus, looker, Drew, TD, Dave, A50, Walter, Lav, TD, NPOM, Walter
My Read: Seems to be extremely agressive and likes LHF. Scum.

Spoiler:

Are there links to prove any of this? And are there links to prove it's not ad hoc?

In post 2357, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 2355, Gamma Emerald wrote:@CHK at this point I feel like you're being contrarian/confrontational.
That's not necessarily scum, but with chkflip, it feels like Tasmanian Devil levels of unproductive confrontation.

It's a tasteless, tacky tactic, and I don't find it believable.

We still have 2 more non-voters.
Again, Gamma Emerald is being interesting. I can't tell if he disagrees with what I've written. He's saying my reactions are "inflammatory", but I'm assuming not the things I'm reacting to...?
It took davesaz a while, but he finally got there. Congrats.
At some point, Doctor Drew decided I was scum. I guess Lavender's lynch wasn't coming quick enough.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:28 pm**

In post 2053, Doctor Drew wrote:Looker, I see that you are saying that PK 'must be together' for some reason'. But why would we use code words in the game when we could, ya know, coordinate things in our 'PT'?

I can't even understand why a sane person would think the most logical explanation is that they are clearly together, I honestly am baffled by your thought train. You are doing some crazy mental gymnastics here.

And even if we are 'something' why would you potentially out 'something' that could be town based(mason, friendly neighbor, other roles that could be town based that use a PT....or even just knowledge of each others role/alignment).

It is like you are trying to make us look bad without the risk of calling us scum/cult for fear that one or both of us flip town, you can say 'well I never said they were scum, just together in some way', and possibly rolefishing.

In post 2147, Doctor Drew wrote:PK, it isn't so much that he is saying there is a connection between us, it is that he is saying there is a connection and it doesn't necessarily mean we are scum. Why risk outing a town role/roles like that?

Why not say 'I think they may be scum together because this connection' or 'if one of them flips scum than there is a high probability the other flips scum as well'? And if you don't think they are scum(or cult), then why say anything?

I just feel like he is trying to role fish and hope we confirm or deny our 'connection', I don't see a town mentality behind this, but I fear I am alone in my thinking here

Have been thinking you may be scum for awhile, now I am not alone in my thinking.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:30 pm**

THE POO POO JOKE?!?!?

Spoiler:

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:32 pm**

"Your real anger seems fake and is a tactic"

Hooooooooooo boooooooooy

You're a gem.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:33 pm**

Sorry, I just couldn't imagine someone being so pathetic as to actually get angry over this stuff lmao. What is your life, bro

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:34 pm**

It gets better.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:34 pm**

This is getting near-bannable.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:35 pm**

You're an incredibly tiny person when you're being wagoned.

How unfortunate.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:35 pm**

OnGoInG gAmEs

p-edit:

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:37 pm**

Imagine thinking it's not morally reprehensible to do what you've done in your last, like, ten posts to me.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:38 pm**

Ah, you must think highly of me to create such a double standard. I'm flattered.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:40 pm**

"Drag'em into AtEEEEE!"

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:41 pm**

Okay, I'm bored now lol, good night

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:42 pm**

I said

your posts

were contentless and that you didn't actually care about the things you were bringing up.

You just called

me

pathetic.

I didn't call you a Troglodyte, which is a fictional fucking creature and an absurd thing to call someone, until you went on to insult literally everyone who thought to not call you or what you were doing town.

Nice horse, guy. Absolutely can't wait to never play with you again.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 4:59 pm**

Still not sure looker is scum, but on a moral/personal level I super-hate how he is interacting with chk

.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 5:02 pm**

Hey Chk, if Looker is scum, you almost assuredly aren't, and vice-versa really. You cool with being tomorrow's lynch if looker flips red? Cause like, I still think you/pooky is more likely, but that is incompatible with looker, and if they flip red that would hardclear both of you to me, which would be very worth, so I am thinking of voting looker here. Whatcha' think?

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 5:18 pm**

I don't engage with or humor WIFOM bullshit, sorry.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 5:30 pm**

In post 2418, TiphaineDeath wrote:Hey Chk, if Looker is scum, you almost assuredly aren't, and vice-versa really. You cool with being tomorrow's lynch if looker flips red? Cause like, I still think you/pooky is more likely, but that is incompatible with looker, and if they flip red that would hardclear both of you to me, which would be very worth, so I am thinking of voting looker here. Whatcha' think?

you mean if looker flips town?

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 5:44 pm**

In post 2418, TiphaineDeath wrote:You cool with being tomorrow's lynch if looker flips red?

This part, specifically, is the WIFOM I will not engage with.

Obviously I'm scum reading Looker.

Obviously I want him gone.

But if you want me to be one of those "if I'm wrong, lynch me tomorrow" types then you're barking up the wrong tree.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 6:09 pm**

Lol, then we may not be able to communicate well, because associations and future associations are a big part of the logic of how I play this game.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 6:11 pm**

Associations are integral.

Blood for the blood God pacts aren't.

Posted: **Mon Oct 05, 2020 6:12 pm**

TDeath do you think Looker is scum here?

Mafiascum.net

Musician Mafia: Guitarists GAME OVER