Mafiascum.net

Bypasser Catcher is still obvtown and i’m never eliminating there. Even if they were on the Nero wagon.

In post 2396, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 2392, Bypasser Catcher wrote:IT WASNT FUCKING BAD LOGIC

Are you defending the meta logic now? Why? It was bad. That’s the point.

no.

the logic that their tracker claim was trash as sfuck,.

In post 2399, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 2398, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 2394, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 2388, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m not saying it is btw. There surely was scum on the Nero wagon, but these discredits r bad.

So you think there’s Scum on the wagon, but all I’m doing is discrediting? You know you can’t have it both ways right?

I’m not saying one is unquestionably true. I just find it bad how you seem to shade all voters on the wagon.

I haven’t shaded all the voters on the wagon. Like what are you talking about.

You earlier called my read into question because i was wrong about Nero.
And you have also been FOS’ing Bypasser.

1 wrong read in a PoE doesnt mean that the poe is bad.

Regardless, let bygones be bygones.
We’re resolving in N_M/Norfolk anyway.

In post 2362, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 2356, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 2345, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 2344, Andresvmb wrote:Why have a D1 that long with all that content to vote a player based on the speculation that they were afraid of another player replacing into a slot that had not posted at all? Genius.

Ok big brain.
Why did Mathblade die?
Big mislim potential but they were killed.

Why are you asking me something only Scum know? I have no idea why Mini / Math was the choice, outside of the obvious fact that they were a PR.

This could legit be a teammate to Titus if they are scum.
What is this logic, you don’t know what scum was thinking but they might have killed Mini because they are PR? Where did they PR crumb?

Tbqh I haven’t entirely liked Andres’ posting today so far
But I’m unsure whether it’s him scum posting or just a bit of alienation

In post 2371, Titus wrote:There's got to be scum pushing the only reason to kill Math is fear. The fact of the matter is scum could have killed Math to prevent a shakeup in the town.

Second, I largely agreed with Nero on his reads. Miselimming me and Nero would possibly allow scum to steamroll.

Which reads of Nero’s did you agree with?

In post 2397, chkflip wrote:I'm following Titus and I feel like Nero would follow a guilty track. Otherwise I'm uncertain what you mean. (Titus and I will surely VCA later, don't you worry.)

I dont understand, you voted titus and your following titus?

Also nero flipped VT. Nero follows guilty track? huh?

In post 2405, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2362, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 2356, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 2345, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 2344, Andresvmb wrote:Why have a D1 that long with all that content to vote a player based on the speculation that they were afraid of another player replacing into a slot that had not posted at all? Genius.

Ok big brain.
Why did Mathblade die?
Big mislim potential but they were killed.

Why are you asking me something only Scum know? I have no idea why Mini / Math was the choice, outside of the obvious fact that they were a PR.

This could legit be a teammate to Titus if they are scum.
What is this logic, you don’t know what scum was thinking but they might have killed Mini because they are PR? Where did they PR crumb?

Tbqh I haven’t entirely liked Andres’ posting today so far
But I’m unsure whether it’s him scum posting or just a bit of alienation

Alright I’m out.

VOTE: Norfolk Boy1

N_M why did you target Norfolk?

In post 2372, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 2357, Bypasser Catcher wrote:and yet scum killed outside the supposed "core" that was being built d1.

That's the kind of NK I'd make, trying to save the mod some work and I hate dealing with lurksacks regardless of my alignment.

I only do that if I feel like it would be dishonorable to win by exploiting town apathy

Btw I think in the NM vs. Norfolk debate I don’t like how NM changed his claim but it wasn’t under pressure so I can let it slide.

In post 2374, Bypasser Catcher wrote:im more trustworthy of people who scumread nero after the stupid fakeclaim bullshit they pulled. cuz town perspective 100% sees that shit as scumfuck shit.

idgaf how u twist it u dont get to discredit anyone pushing the nero lim just for pushing nero cause there were valid reasons for it. to toss someone's towniness away just cause u didnt like the wagon they pushed is absurd.

the early votes are more likely to be scum. luca im reconsidering bc of their meta shit they pushed but otherwise idgi

No. I still TR Norway and momrangal. The other early votes I might be able to see as scum but those two I definitively TR.

In post 2376, Bypasser Catcher wrote:i refuse to believe that nero is some good player after the shit they pulled lmfao

good players dont gamethrow

Good players can have bad games. I don’t like how hard you’re slamming Nero posthumously rn.

maybe like consider my poe where i dont get why yall calling neros reads sheepable when they felt just omgusy and considering at least fmpov i would look at my name as called out and just laugh.

but whatever i digress. norfolk's first post needs to be a roleclaim.

please if u discuss stuff make sure that is present so that norfolk cant stall for time.

In post 2412, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2376, Bypasser Catcher wrote:i refuse to believe that nero is some good player after the shit they pulled lmfao

good players dont gamethrow

Good players can have bad games. I don’t like how hard you’re slamming Nero posthumously rn.

i dont ever fakeclaim a role and then self and AtE furiously just to avoid an elimination as a VT. thats just straight up trashcan play.

i dont feel bad about trashing that play.

In post 2395, Bypasser Catcher wrote:just ufcking acknowledge nero was playing against their wincon lmfao

I can admit that, but that didn’t make voting him out right. He didn’t seem like he couldn’t be reined in. My opinion on policying people who act like Nero was is I only really do it if I don’t think it can be reconciled. Nero seemed like he was willing to work with me, he was playing against wincon but I feel like I had the ability to get him to stop that.

In post 2407, Vaxkiller wrote:I dont understand, you voted titus and your following titus?

Also nero flipped VT. Nero follows guilty track? huh?

ARE YOU BEING PURPOSEFULLY OBTUSE, BOY!?

Ahem. As I was.

I voted Titus because I was hoping she'd come in and we could dive into it. I've not scum read Titus. It was pressure to get 'em to come in punching. Then Not_Maf came back with the guilty so that bit is on hold. I *will* revisit it, now just isn't the time for it.

Nero following anything was just my homage to the silly cube claim I just made. I feel like Nero would persue this avenue so I'm putting my name on that wagon ezpz.

Are we all caught up now?

In post 2400, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Bypasser Catcher is still obvtown and i’m never eliminating there. Even if they were on the Nero wagon.

I disagree that BC is obvtown

In post 2319, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Who else knows Mathblade here?

I will be meta-diving to see if you already know the answer to that one.

I agree the kill was definitely because of MathBlade, not because of Mini. BUT it’s too WIFOMy. Maybe someone close to MathBlade killed him. If I were scum and someone floated the idea of killing him in the pt, I might prepare for my role of slowly, gently building up to accuse Titus like you did.

I played a game with them recently so maybe I have some insight here, and I don’t think Titus is *afraid* of MathBlade. They were both town, and MathBlade definitely wanted Titus to be scum. So the motive is there, but... it’s just too much WIFOM to be sure.

I like this much better.
VOTE: NB1

In post 2417, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2400, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Bypasser Catcher is still obvtown and i’m never eliminating there. Even if they were on the Nero wagon.

I disagree that BC is obvtown

cuz ur method of reading sux at reading me

In post 2415, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 2395, Bypasser Catcher wrote:just ufcking acknowledge nero was playing against their wincon lmfao

I can admit that, but that didn’t make voting him out right. He didn’t seem like he couldn’t be reined in. My opinion on policying people who act like Nero was is I only really do it if I don’t think it can be reconciled. Nero seemed like he was willing to work with me, he was playing against wincon but I feel like I had the ability to get him to stop that.

i have 0 regrets. if i ever saw it again, id repeat my actions. there is 0 shame in policying shit like that. it wasnt even a policy they just straight up basically claimed scum and we limmed them. i get u wanna be right on these things but like u gotta be consistent and not let that kinda play slide.

In post 2418, Rannygazoo wrote:I will be meta-diving to see if you already know the answer to that one.

What on earth does this mean?

ok sorry im flooding the game with this dumb discussion.

im gonna just step back and let shit happen im just annoyed in general at this game cuz i was hoping at least some1 on hayker wagon would die so id feel confirmed that that was the right path.

In post 2421, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 2418, Rannygazoo wrote:I will be meta-diving to see if you already know the answer to that one.

What on earth does this mean?

It looks like you’re trying to fake a build-up to accusing Titus, or you’re planting seeds so someone else will do it for you.

What’s your thought on Ranny’s recent post here BC