Mafiascum.net

Well that's strange.

In post 2380, catboi wrote:I don't regret killing grendel at all

+1

In post 2381, The Three Bears wrote:

In post 2377, Cephrir wrote:

In post 2374, The Three Bears wrote:

In post 2367, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: Bears

Spicy.

Need to talk with my other heads.

I also need to look at who made the last wagon and WHY dangit.


for now, VOTE: Norwee

The why really isnt much of a mystery

Cause Meg is a low poster and LHF and repped out, and Grendal who rarely plays reps out? Replacements are NAI.

So again, Why??

Priority is currently learning who targetted us last night.

-Pinkie the Domination bear.

The rep out was suspicious and took away my qualms about pushing the slot. Plus once the wagon swung there wasn't a point in making someone rep in immediately claim and probably get yeeted anyway.

It seems a bit weird for scum!Ircher to openly admit they target someone that they likely know will deny their claim.

In post 2402, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It seems a bit weird for scum!Ircher to openly admit they target someone that they likely know will deny their claim.

They have to claim someone.

So i’m gonna assume roleblock for now, unless someone knows that scum!Ircher makes plays such as this.

In post 2404, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 2402, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It seems a bit weird for scum!Ircher to openly admit they target someone that they likely know will deny their claim.

They have to claim someone.

Then they just made an bad fake claim.

In post 2394, Ircher wrote:Flea, it's okay that uou're upset about it, but this is just noise at this point.

I'm more annoyed at the response. Which I'm actually using to work things out.

I said I was miffed. I'm more annoying at people putting words in my mouth.

Minor discussion about replacements being NAI - nothing much.
Catboi saying quite a bit with 3 words. Interesting.
StD being a scumbucket opener and pretending like I'm going to go full martyr - that actually annoyed me.
Norwee dropping some BS.
Cephir thinking I'm going to firing up the inquisition? really? I want to know who targetted us last night, thats been my question from the start. The rest was a reflection of actions I was going to take, not actually looking for input.
Galron comes in "lol start questioning then" - I already asked my question. Which nobody is answering so I'm assuming nobody yet is willing to say we were targetted by them.

People are revving me up - and I'm already unstable.

SO how about people stop acting defensive and ready to deflect?

>:)

-Pinkie

In post 2400, Ircher wrote:Well that's strange.

That’s all you gonna say tho?
You don’t have any theory?

Norwee we aren't doing this.

VOTE: Ircher

Everyone shuts up about night actions and we go next.

In post 2409, Tet wrote:Norwee we aren't doing this.

VOTE: Ircher

Everyone shuts up about night actions and we go next.

Nope.

Current priority is we know who targetted us last night.

In post 2410, The Three Bears wrote:

In post 2409, Tet wrote:Norwee we aren't doing this.

VOTE: Ircher

Everyone shuts up about night actions and we go next.

Nope.

Current priority is we know who targetted us last night.

--Pinkie

I mean, the most plausible is I got blocked. What is strange is why someone felt the need to block me here.
The other theory is catboi is scum and trying to get me mislimmed, but I targeted catboi specifically because I was town reading the slot and didn't think they would be killed.

Why that important Bears?

Unless you get an alignment check when targeted, it's not that important.

Catboi is town and Ircher had to name someone.

They can pick a townie who will say they didn't get it or a scum who will say they did.

But Ircher would condemn a scum player by doing that eventually and he can claim roleblocked.

The choice is obvious for scum ircher.

So ircher naming catboi isn't town indicative

In post 2413, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Why that important Bears?

Cause I said so. We have information. It just needs refinement.

In post 2414, Tet wrote:Unless you get an alignment check when targeted, it's not that important.

Wouldn't you like to know.

In post 2417, The Three Bears wrote:

In post 2413, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Why that important Bears?

Cause I said so. We have information. It just needs refinement.

In post 2414, Tet wrote:Unless you get an alignment check when targeted, it's not that important.

Wouldn't you like to know.

I wouldn't actually. See my previous posts.

I would but there's nothing there.

Casual lil role fishing? >:P

-Pinkie

Flea it's extremely counterproductive to ask someone to out their role and at the same time go "but don't ask anything about our role because I'm not telling"

If you have info that can slam a slot there are more clever ways to go about it. If not then I don't see the point in having another slot out so you can get what you want.

Or we can just do it tomorrow....again.

In post 2420, The Three Bears wrote:I would but there's nothing there.

Casual lil role fishing? >:P

-Pinkie

You're being insufferable. Tet is clearly saying they want no info shared and to kill Ircher and go next to keep info out of hands of scum.

In post 2420, The Three Bears wrote:I would but there's nothing there.

Casual lil role fishing? >:P

-Pinkie

Ok.

In post 2421, Tet wrote:Flea it's extremely counterproductive to ask someone to out their role and at the same time go "but don't ask anything about our role because I'm not telling"

If you have info that can slam a slot there are more clever ways to go about it. If not then I don't see the point in having another slot out so you can get what you want.

Or we can just do it tomorrow....again.

No, I've asked for confirmation of a visitor.
Information will be given freely once I have these confirmations.

Don't mis-rep me.

-Pink