Mafiascum.net

In post 2394, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also. Titus hydra scum? Hello?

In post 2351, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:It’s not a lurker push

Norwegian brought up that the slot is a lurker

as an aside

catboi then picked up on it and now it’s being wrongly framed as a lurker push

I will rephrase the case when I get to the computer, so it’s abundantly clear and no one can use this “lurker push” reasoning as an excuse to stay off the wagon

In post 2395, The Keeper wrote:Nashville is Mala and Titus, yes?
Titus is currently unwell and has made this known.
Mala seems very much seems to use the Ventrical Scalpel a lot just appear randomly.

In post 2391, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 2388, catboi wrote:

In post 2385, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 2380, catboi wrote:1. my issue is that the way he's been playing this game seems scummy to me and isn't in line with my expectations of his town game

Idk what your expectation of my towngame is, but i get the impression everyone assumes i should be an scum hunting god in every game, and if i'm not then that means i must be scum.

no and that's not really representative at all of what i am saying

the issue is that you don't seem to

care

about finding scum in this game

Bold claim to make on day 1.

In post 2352, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Keeper are you trying to be as negative and annoying as possible?

In post 2408, Flavor Leaf wrote:I'm pro keeper in this debate, while not 100% agreeing with them either.

In post 2390, Save The Dragons wrote:I'm a monk don't make me Smashing Palm, 1000 Fists of Heaven both of you

In post 184, Titus wrote:

In post 178, Enchant wrote:Either way, we need BLAST Norwee.

This seems rather serious for this point in the game.

VOTE: Sword of Ducks

In post 190, Titus wrote:

In post 185, Tracer Bullet wrote:Titus rolled scum I see

Totally, but why are you saying that? I find it funny (not sure alignment wise) that you're attacking the vote without asking why or defending Ducks.

In post 2398, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 2395, The Keeper wrote:

In post 2347, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 2346, The Keeper wrote:

In post 2332, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 2331, The Keeper wrote:Also you said there's a slip.
So is there, or isn;t there?

did you read what i said

Did you?

yes i did read what i said

In post 2346, The Keeper wrote:

In post 2309, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 2308, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:

In post 2270, catboi wrote:

In post 2267, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Killing off a scum lurker such as Nashville is a pretty good day 1 elim me thinks.

Okay, why Nashville in particular for you, over any number of the other lurky players?

You kind of answered it already in your reads list; their progression on you made no sense and I think they just forgot who they were pretending to be scumreading lol

I wouldn’t say lurking is the sole or even the primary reason for scumreading them. They happen to also be lurking. And their slip makes them the most likely to flip scum

@keeper

"Their slip" is factored in.

In post 2318, Save The Dragons wrote:my point isn't necessarily that there's a slip but that there's reasons behind the push, it's not like people are targeting them for just lurking

Suddenly its not important.

that's not exactly what that says, my point isn't "hey look at this slip" it's "hey look at this reasoning" the slip is irrelevant it's the fact that there's reasoning that's important, and that's what my post says so i'm not sure where you're getting on about me caring whether or not there's a slip

In post 2346, The Keeper wrote:

In post 2334, Save The Dragons wrote:i did not say "there is no slip" i said there are reasons behind pushing nashville

equating it to just being a lurker push is icky

And I didn't - again, whatever you infer is what you infer.
Nashville isn't the only one who's been lurker pushed.

Nice you gave yourself the clown hat though, just as I warming up to you too.

then what the fuck was the point of that post

saying "oh look at this" but then backing down every time someone tries to justify anything from it is slimy as shit

Nashville isn't the only person who's been pushed for lurking though this day.
And yet almost every single one who has been, has posted significantly more than I at the point they were accused.

I'm not backing down either. The fact you've condemned yourself by running into my posts face first is on you.

Yes I called out post counts.
Because we have over 90 pages of shit flinging that's done nothing but kick up a stink.
So much so there's a clear divide between 1/3rd of the game and the rest of it.
And still people are wanting shots at the lurkers?


Nashville is Mala and Titus, yes?
Titus is currently unwell and has made this known.
Mala seems very much seems to use the Ventrical Scalpel a lot just appear randomly.

What

the

fuck

do

you

want

is

all

i

want

to

know

In post 2400, Save The Dragons wrote:you got me i fell right into your trap

In post 1312, Titus wrote:I'm seeing a bunch of counterwagons spring up to MonkeyMan576 and I am not a fan.

In post 2407, Save The Dragons wrote:keeper your opinion of the nashville wagon is not reality i'm sorry but that's the point people are trying to make

In post 2412, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 184, Titus wrote:

In post 178, Enchant wrote:Either way, we need BLAST Norwee.

This seems rather serious for this point in the game.

VOTE: Sword of Ducks

Awful reasoning for their first vote.

In post 190, Titus wrote:

In post 185, Tracer Bullet wrote:Titus rolled scum I see

Totally, but why are you saying that? I find it funny (not sure alignment wise) that you're attacking the vote without asking why or defending Ducks.

Saying "totally" feels to me like scum deflecting. It's an kind of ironic off-hand comment that liars often use to try to make themselves and other people seem at ease when they know they are guilty.

In post 1779, tictac wrote:

In post 1281, Flavor Leaf wrote:Tictac I believe voted Catboi with an 'Ahem', meaning something pinged them to get them there.

i wanted my question answered, so a light vote. didn't love the immediate omgus tho.
seems a pettern w him to omgus the most recent push/vote on him actually.
kinda funny since ur push makes him this mastermind.

In post 2408, Flavor Leaf wrote:I'm pro keeper in this debate, while not 100% agreeing with them either.

In post 2422, The Keeper wrote:

In post 2408, Flavor Leaf wrote:I'm pro keeper in this debate, while not 100% agreeing with them either.

Almost like I'm a surface level player with surface level thoughts and commentary with nothing hidden in deeper layers...


Almost like its day 1 of a game...

In post 2422, The Keeper wrote:

In post 2408, Flavor Leaf wrote:I'm pro keeper in this debate, while not 100% agreeing with them either.

Almost like I'm a surface level player with surface level thoughts and commentary with nothing hidden in deeper layers...


Almost like its day 1 of a game...