Mafiascum.net

In post 2422, Zachstralkita wrote:Again, not stopping you just like you're not gonna stop me when she flips town and I laugh.

Me, earlier wrote:Regardless, she is

incredibly

damaging to town.

In post 2375, AGar wrote: We spent some 40-50 pages dealing with two sets of mason claims, all of which are bullshit. Multiple people who were voting Titus have since said "I won't vote Titus today." Go and read the fucking thread and see it for yourself dickweed. Don't lurk your ass of for the whole game and then opportunistically NOT KNOW what the fuck is going on and claim "Hurr durr you left L-4 to go to L-6." You're both fucking stupid and need to read the game.

There is logic. We need

something

of fucking use to happen for now. If that means wagonning up Vedith, I'm all for it. He's been absolute shit since he came in, and he replaced a slot that contributed nothing, so we might as well consider him a fresh start. Am I pissed that we're not going to powerlynch the fuck out of scumbag Titus today? Absolutely. But don't be part of the dipshit brigade, this is a logical and intentional move.

In post 2419, podoboq wrote:

If a player is damaging to town, you should lynch them.

In post 2423, Titus wrote:Certainly wasn't to survive. Policy is to lynch all mason claims @ lylo plus 1 day if not nked.

In post 2426, Airick10 wrote:

In post 2375, AGar wrote: We spent some 40-50 pages dealing with two sets of mason claims, all of which are bullshit. Multiple people who were voting Titus have since said "I won't vote Titus today." Go and read the fucking thread and see it for yourself dickweed. Don't lurk your ass of for the whole game and then opportunistically NOT KNOW what the fuck is going on and claim "Hurr durr you left L-4 to go to L-6." You're both fucking stupid and need to read the game.

There is logic. We need

something

of fucking use to happen for now. If that means wagonning up Vedith, I'm all for it. He's been absolute shit since he came in, and he replaced a slot that contributed nothing, so we might as well consider him a fresh start. Am I pissed that we're not going to powerlynch the fuck out of scumbag Titus today? Absolutely. But don't be part of the dipshit brigade, this is a logical and intentional move.

I have read the last 2 days of the game. After V/LA, I simply gave up on the first 3 days reading through 60+ pages. However... yes I acknowledged in post 2309 that the town maybe open to discussing Dunn/Titus further in D2.

That being said, you've had a vote on Titus throughout 100+ pages of posts. Titus is also the closest to be lynched now. I do not find it logical to bail on her to follow the Vedith wagon. The first thing you mention is that he's been absolute shit since he came in. There's no logic there. If you want to say he hasn't contributed, fine. If you come out and say you feel more confident Vedith is scum, fine. But don't try to come across that you casted a logical vote blaming the town on not riding the Titus vote.

In post 2427, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 2419, podoboq wrote:

If a player is damaging to town, you should lynch them.

VOTE: podoboq

In post 2392, podoboq wrote:

In post 2390, Zachstralkita wrote:I can't stand for that mandatory fakeclaiming is scum on principle bullshit, by the way.

Then lynch me on principle.

In post 2429, podoboq wrote:

In post 2426, Airick10 wrote:

In post 2375, AGar wrote: We spent some 40-50 pages dealing with two sets of mason claims, all of which are bullshit. Multiple people who were voting Titus have since said "I won't vote Titus today." Go and read the fucking thread and see it for yourself dickweed. Don't lurk your ass of for the whole game and then opportunistically NOT KNOW what the fuck is going on and claim "Hurr durr you left L-4 to go to L-6." You're both fucking stupid and need to read the game.

There is logic. We need

something

of fucking use to happen for now. If that means wagonning up Vedith, I'm all for it. He's been absolute shit since he came in, and he replaced a slot that contributed nothing, so we might as well consider him a fresh start. Am I pissed that we're not going to powerlynch the fuck out of scumbag Titus today? Absolutely. But don't be part of the dipshit brigade, this is a logical and intentional move.

I have read the last 2 days of the game. After V/LA, I simply gave up on the first 3 days reading through 60+ pages. However... yes I acknowledged in post 2309 that the town maybe open to discussing Dunn/Titus further in D2.

That being said, you've had a vote on Titus throughout 100+ pages of posts. Titus is also the closest to be lynched now. I do not find it logical to bail on her to follow the Vedith wagon. The first thing you mention is that he's been absolute shit since he came in. There's no logic there. If you want to say he hasn't contributed, fine. If you come out and say you feel more confident Vedith is scum, fine. But don't try to come across that you casted a logical vote blaming the town on not riding the Titus vote.

Airick10 is town. Congratulations, you win the right to be ignored and not cooperated with.

In post 2428, podoboq wrote:

In post 2423, Titus wrote:Certainly wasn't to survive. Policy is to lynch all mason claims @ lylo plus 1 day if not nked.

Good to know. Next time I'm scum in a group of three or more, we'll all just claim masons, and win the game. Easy. You claimed to survive

longer

, which is totally worth it, especially if you have a valuable night action, and if you're killing the smart players who know to lynch you.

In post 2431, Titus wrote:I had to do what I did.

In post 2432, Titus wrote:

In post 2428, podoboq wrote:

In post 2423, Titus wrote:Certainly wasn't to survive. Policy is to lynch all mason claims @ lylo plus 1 day if not nked.

Good to know. Next time I'm scum in a group of three or more, we'll all just claim masons, and win the game. Easy. You claimed to survive

longer

, which is totally worth it, especially if you have a valuable night action, and if you're killing the smart players who know to lynch you.

That would be lynch at 9* alive.

In post 2423, Titus wrote:

In post 2418, Wake1 wrote:

In post 2414, Titus wrote:Yes, from my perspective I cannot say why. That would be breaking the rules.

So I was stuck with game throwing (deliberately letting Dunn be lynched) or fake claiming to save him

The former makes me more like able but is an outright ban able offense.

@ GIF, could you clarify your position on this?

I'm not liking how you're saying "don't lynch Dunnstral because ~ongoing~ game. That sucks because you can keep saying no while not ever explaining yourself. This is why it shouldn't be done in the first place.

Why else do you think I fake claimed mason?

Certainly wasn't to survive. Policy is to lynch all mason claims @ lylo plus 1 day if not nked.

In post 2424, Titus wrote:It WAS the only way to remain in compliance. You think I like being told I am a dick, useless, damaging, disruptive, bad or anything else? No. That's not useful as either alignment. So, why do it?

I had no other choice. Scum can wait until l minus 1 and hope shit blows over or PR claim. I couldn't. Masons, although not ideal, was the only way not to cheat.

In post 2435, Dunnstral wrote:The reason we can't move forward is because players like podoboq and varsoon don't want to talk about anything but the mason claims and won't pick a real lynch target/play the game

In post 2435, Dunnstral wrote:The reason we can't move forward is because players like podoboq and varsoon don't want to talk about anything but the mason claims and won't pick a real lynch target/play the game

In post 2437, Wake1 wrote:Town needs to work together. It's that simple.

In post 2440, Dunnstral wrote:Not sure where everyone pulled these numbers from, lylo at 9 players, 3 days to get there, guess I'm just less informed of the setup or people are making absolutely massive assumptions

In post 2442, Dunnstral wrote:I'm ready to work together, we just need to stop talking about Titus completely

In post 2443, Titus wrote:I think he's just going to troll though.