Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:47 am
Who - what - where - when - how - why RC?In post 2418, Jingle wrote:@Who- Why RC?
Mafiascum.net
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
2078: Any Non-Dead Person Can Post In This Mafia Game [end]
Page 98 of 273
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:47 am
In post 2373, Jingle wrote:mastina - town-by-claim masonizer
Jingle - IC
Titus/popsofctown - Player absorber
EeveeLution Army -> Neighbor+. Fullclaim in the hood, considering whether to out specifics or not.
Pine - Relationship -> loverizer
Who/RadiantCowbells -> Player absorber
nomnomnom - Kison/zor -> Vig
Lavender - jeep+meme autowin.
ofrhz - Politico -> ? (Don't claim unless necessary)
Ausuka - unclaimed
PenguinPower - Minimal posting required
@Titus, is there more to your role than player absorption?
@RC, do you think engagement with the game is AI for Who?
@Eevee, specify that I am actually confirmed town in the OP of the neighborhood, please, in case you die and the town gets derpy.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:47 am
In post 1722, Pine wrote:Sure, I'll fullclaim*. It's relevant.In post 1705, Jingle wrote:You're claiming loverizer?In post 1701, Pine wrote:Also calling bullshit.In post 1659, Who wrote:I'm calling bullshit. There's no reason for town to do something like that. Claimed survivor and now has vig shots? Sounds like survivor who just turned serial killer.
VOTE: Nomnomnom
My power, activated by posters from the Relationships thread, is Cupid shots. These serve much the same function as Vigilante shots.
The name of the role is town relationships X-shot cupid. If one of the top five posters in the 'Relationships' thread posts in this thread during a game day, one of my shots activates. The shot loverizes my targets. This serves a very similar balance function to an activated vigilante, so I do NOT believe nomnomnom is Town.
The possibility that she's a SK hadn't occurred to me, so I'll give some thought to keeping her around as a leashed SK, but I'm usually against it.
*At the last second I decided to redact the number of shots I'm eligible for. It's a finite number, but that number is tactical information, and sharing it really only serves scum.
PE: Christ, fourteen posts since I started writing.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:48 am
so
masonizerz
loverizezr
vig
IC
should be lynching in this pool since that's not all town basically regardless of what scum is
masonizerz
loverizezr
vig
IC
should be lynching in this pool since that's not all town basically regardless of what scum is
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:49 am
For the record.
Really not fond of both of my tertiary scumspects pushing for an Eevee lynch...
...When my result, albeit potentially damning, is in no way an assured 100% guilty.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:49 am
not today but it should happen
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:49 am
@Mastina why do you think your result failed? As in, most likely reason for you?
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:50 am
your shot failed*
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:50 am
had you claimed on D1?
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:51 am
i think regardless of the possibility of interference that we should be lynching ELA today.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:51 am
There is no way there are 4 groupscum in this game FMPOV.In post 2421, mastina wrote:While I think town power may be strong this game (may be, not definitely is), if so, scum are EQUALLY as OP. Not in terms of numbers; in terms of power roles.
@RC - relevant to setup spec the masonizer claim is publicly hated that doesn't leave in LYLO and both the vig and loverizer are heavily gated.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:52 am
how is everything gated
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:52 am
I have thoughts on this, but don't want to share them before I figure out the setup a little more.In post 2434, RadiantCowbells wrote:i think regardless of the possibility of interference that we should be lynching ELA today.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:52 am
In post 844, Pine wrote:Exactly.In post 843, EeveeLution Army wrote:all survivors must die, in my experience they always side with scum, nomnom defend thyself and pledge extreme loyalty to town
Not true Pine. Elsa was 3P survivor in Overkill 1 and she actually greatly contributed to town winning that game.In post 846, Pine wrote:Which kind of proves my point. If nomnomnom were ACTUALLY a survivor, they gain nothing but problems by claiming it. Scum, however, can use the claim to lead investigations and other actions away from themselves, and then when endgame rolls around can say “why lynch me when you have a real threat to lynch.”
An actual survivor shouldn’t have claimed it like that, not so early with no pressure. QED, likely lying scum.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:53 am
also i think lavender is always scum here.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:54 am
vig needed both kison and zor to post ITT (claimed neutral survivor that won at that point and retracted when it happened)
loverizer gets a shot whenever a person who is top 5 in the relationship thread posts about relationships in this thread. Believable because ofhrz claimed similar gate to an unspecified power.
loverizer gets a shot whenever a person who is top 5 in the relationship thread posts about relationships in this thread. Believable because ofhrz claimed similar gate to an unspecified power.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:54 am
this isn't gating.In post 2440, Jingle wrote:vig needed both kison and zor to post ITT (claimed neutral survivor that won at that point and retracted when it happened)
loverizer gets a shot whenever a person who is top 5 in the relationship thread posts about relationships in this thread. Believable because ofhrz claimed similar gate to an unspecified power.
vig needed both kison and zor to post ITT (claimed neutral survivor that won at that point and retracted when it happened)loverizer gets a shot whenever a person who is top 5 in the relationship thread posts about relationships in this thread. Believable because ofhrz claimed similar gate to an unspecified power.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:55 am
Who among the players knows jeep/meme enough to come up with that claim?In post 2439, RadiantCowbells wrote:also i think lavender is always scum here.
My thoughts are pine/pops/mastina.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:55 am
Yep, Mastina’s definitely town.In post 2429, mastina wrote:For the record.
Really not fond of both of my tertiary scumspects pushing for an Eevee lynch...
...When my result, albeit potentially damning, is in no way an assured 100% guilty.
I should “play” in more games like this. I think ironically not actually playing in a game can give you better reads.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:55 am
that's not what I'm saying
i totally believe the claim but I think it's a scum role.
i totally believe the claim but I think it's a scum role.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:55 am
I've been INCREDIBLY busy and still am. I dropped that claim and then was immediately gone (which is a trend you'll see from me in all my games across the site--show up, say one thing, then leave, because busy).In post 2274, EeveeLution Army wrote:Im also annoyed that mastina kinda just dropped that without going into any detail.
But I gave what I could give. I used a masonizer action on you last night.
I am waiting for the mod to get back to me on how it resolved.
We didn't become masons, in spite of the submitted night action.
That's not a hard guilty, but it's something that I needed to claim just in case.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:56 am
reasons? I liked the reaction to my voteIn post 2439, RadiantCowbells wrote:also i think lavender is always scum here.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:57 am
You think Mastina’s scum? If so, I officially give up on ever trying to read her.In post 2442, Jingle wrote:Who among the players knows jeep/meme enough to come up with that claim?In post 2439, RadiantCowbells wrote:also i think lavender is always scum here.
My thoughts are pine/pops/mastina.
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:57 am
i think it would be borderline bastard to subject the scum team to an autolose based off of town working together to get jeep or MeMe to post in the game that they can't really 'interfere' with
scum manipulating town into getting jeep or MeMe to post in the game seems a lot more fair game to me.
on top of that, I think it's literally impossible that a newer player sees a role that automatically wins the game if 2 people posts
doesn't know that they never post anymore (and she claimed to not know that they don't post anymore today)
and doesn't immediately out and say 'HEY WE CAN AUTOMATICALLY WIN THE GAME BY DOING X'
also, why claim it today? If she's town, what changed? I think there was no daytalk and that her partners told her overnight that she should claim the role for towncred
scum manipulating town into getting jeep or MeMe to post in the game seems a lot more fair game to me.
on top of that, I think it's literally impossible that a newer player sees a role that automatically wins the game if 2 people posts
doesn't know that they never post anymore (and she claimed to not know that they don't post anymore today)
and doesn't immediately out and say 'HEY WE CAN AUTOMATICALLY WIN THE GAME BY DOING X'
also, why claim it today? If she's town, what changed? I think there was no daytalk and that her partners told her overnight that she should claim the role for towncred
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2019 9:58 am
also like i skimmed her iso and it's terrible.