https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
well obviously it must be null content thenIn post 2342, SirCakez wrote:I don't understand how you could have these four as null given how much content we've all producedIn post 2253, northsidegal wrote:{cakez, pooky, faker, cat} - null
In post 2428, Faker wrote:No, because chess when you were young required sitting down across from another person
Sometimes you even have to talk to them
I didn't think we were splitting hairs, at least in that conversation. It may not have been super important given andante's status, but I took what you said seriously.In post 2429, Faker wrote:I mean you've spent plenty of time splitting hairs with me over Andante & the like, so it was also a bit annoying for me to see myself land null and that be the crucial content to pay attention to.
Alright time to yeet myself out of MafiaScum.net and join a lawnmower enthusiast forum insteadIn post 2432, northsidegal wrote:nobody has really even presented any real reason for him being scum
I am on my phone and thus incapable of responding to this seriously as I like. Not because it takes too long, but because I am in shitposting mode.In post 2433, northsidegal wrote:I didn't think we were splitting hairs, at least in that conversation. It may not have been super important given andante's status, but I took what you said seriously.In post 2429, Faker wrote:I mean you've spent plenty of time splitting hairs with me over Andante & the like, so it was also a bit annoying for me to see myself land null and that be the crucial content to pay attention to.
Do you think I should be townreading you?
Honestly I have one completed game as scum in the last 4 years, I probably don't even know how to play the alignment tbh so yesIn post 2433, northsidegal wrote:Do you think I should be townreading you?
Unfortunately the more I think about it the more I am convinced it is a townclaim replacement.In post 2439, catboi wrote:I would've been fine shrugyeeting pooky rather than waiting for a replacement but nah not following cakez on a vote
i didn't really find anything very convincing on sleeplessIn post 2432, northsidegal wrote:A flow elim would be so disappointing here. He's actually the definition of limbait (no offense) and nobody has really even presented any real reason for him being scum, it's just "eh he hasn't really been around / doesn't have enough content". Meanwhile I feel like both me and skitter have presented some at least decently compelling reasons to vote sleepless which seem to mostly not have been engaged with.
we're not allowed to discuss this stuff rigthIn post 2444, Faker wrote:Unfortunately the more I think about it the more I am convinced it is a townclaim replacement.In post 2439, catboi wrote:I would've been fine shrugyeeting pooky rather than waiting for a replacement but nah not following cakez on a vote
@nsg how do you feel about this argument for voting flow? you know him right?In post 2317, innocentvillager wrote:we should really get some sort of cross check on this by someone who knows flow trap, because if this is true, ill prolly just vote thereIn post 2313, catboi wrote:Actually
VOTE: flow trap
my impression of him based on researching a few games is that he tends to filler/spam post early as either alignment but as town he gradually transitions into playing more serious where as scum it never really comes, he'll throw in the occasional opinion to look like he's doing something but there's not a lot going on behind the curtain, so to speak. And I feel like his posts over the last couple of real-time days have been essentially that: responding to things for the sake of responding to them but nothing that gives any indication he's really thinking about the game at all
if no one wants to ill do some second hand meta myself later i guess