Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2019 12:13 pm
*predance
You're a strong, high-contribution player widely Townread. He's a gent with almost no contributions to speak of. A G8-L7 pair potentially locks you away in a pairing with no long-term viability even though you I think do have long-term utility in general. Now you didn't accept, sure, but in theory you could have - I guess it's more specifically an invitation for a disruptive pairing and not a disruptive invitation if you frame it that way. Asking L5 is disruptive in the opposite way - it takes a slot not widely Townread, not widely regarded as very readable, regarded by more than one player as moderately compromised in general, and locks it into Dance, forcing out one of two slots regarded as potentially readable (I think?).In post 2447, Lady 7 wrote:Why was asking me a disruptive invitation?
(Also just switched devices and almost logged into my main. ...this does not bode well)
L1 and L6 Interaction from what I’ve seen is never a SvS.In post 2442, Gentleman 5 wrote:I just woke up, but ummm?In post 2438, Lady 5 wrote:I still keep thinking.
If G8 was Scum.
Why would he not want to take down a strong player like Lady 2.
TBH I’m kinda glad this happened.
If Lady 1 dies and flips Mafia, it confirms Lady 6 as Town.
If Lady 2 dies and flips Mafia, it confirms Gentleman 8 as Scum.
Where if I Dies it wouldn’t confirm jack shit especially considering that I’m Town.
Where does these assumptions come from?
I Need to head out for a bit.In post 2451, Lady 2 wrote:You're a strong, high-contribution player widely Townread. He's a gent with almost no contributions to speak of. A G8-L7 pair potentially locks you away in a pairing with no long-term viability even though you I think do have long-term utility in general. Now you didn't accept, sure, but in theory you could have - I guess it's more specifically an invitation for a disruptive pairing and not a disruptive invitation if you frame it that way. Asking L5 is disruptive in the opposite way - it takes a slot not widely Townread, not widely regarded as very readable, regarded by more than one player as moderately compromised in general, and locks it into Dance, forcing out one of two slots regarded as potentially readable (I think?).In post 2447, Lady 7 wrote:Why was asking me a disruptive invitation?
(Also just switched devices and almost logged into my main. ...this does not bode well)
And just the fact that both times he does this without, like, any indication of why he asked who he asked? It's just so hard to see this as not completely calculated.
PEdit: Oh I think this is worse than precancerous, I would say things have definitely invaded through the basement membrane here.
Excuse me.In post 2455, Gentleman 5 wrote:Take a hint hun and shut up
Yeah I mean it’s definitely weird. Part of the reason why I got skeeved out by the invitation was l6 thinking I should take it and I thought that was a plan by the scumteam to pair me with the person they were planning to bus to get me out early. But after g6 hinted at who l6 is, I’m not even sure she’s scum anymore as much as I did before. And that’s even silly because I doubt people know who I am or would even consider me a threat anymore.In post 2451, Lady 2 wrote:You're a strong, high-contribution player widely Townread. He's a gent with almost no contributions to speak of. A G8-L7 pair potentially locks you away in a pairing with no long-term viability even though you I think do have long-term utility in general. Now you didn't accept, sure, but in theory you could have - I guess it's more specifically an invitation for a disruptive pairing and not a disruptive invitation if you frame it that way. Asking L5 is disruptive in the opposite way - it takes a slot not widely Townread, not widely regarded as very readable, regarded by more than one player as moderately compromised in general, and locks it into Dance, forcing out one of two slots regarded as potentially readable (I think?).In post 2447, Lady 7 wrote:Why was asking me a disruptive invitation?
(Also just switched devices and almost logged into my main. ...this does not bode well)
And just the fact that both times he does this without, like, any indication of why he asked who he asked? It's just so hard to see this as not completely calculated.
PEdit: Oh I think this is worse than precancerous, I would say things have definitely invaded through the basement membrane here.
yyyyyup.In post 2433, Lady 7 wrote:Okay strategy people, I now understand why there's some need for strategy in the partners.
Sorry for being a hippie everyone should choose who they want with no thought about anything but that. Not that I think there should be dictatorial control, but.
I get it.
It was fun 40 pages ago, at least. It's getting bloated now. But it's at least not been outright toxic like most large themes are these days.In post 2427, Gentleman 6 wrote:This game is depressing
I have no idea how people like Lady 4 have said they are enjoying this game.
????In post 2466, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'll just leave at start of dance. Still think G5 is scum. L8 flipping scum makes me think that even more so.
I'm going to do other things, later.
I just want to deal with it during the dance. I don't know if he is or not.In post 2461, Gentleman 6 wrote:Am I the only person who thinks G5 is scum
Because if so I'll just leave and wash my hands of the game
Please don't throw.In post 2466, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'll just leave at start of dance. Still think G5 is scum. L8 flipping scum makes me think that even more so.
I'm going to do other things, later.
In post 2466, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'll just leave at start of dance. Still think G5 is scum.L8 flipping scum makes me think that even more so.
I'm going to do other things, later.
You are not.In post 2461, Gentleman 6 wrote:Am I the only person who thinks G5 is scum
Because if so I'll just leave and wash my hands of the game
In post 2423, Gentleman 6 wrote:Why lady 5?