Mafiascum.net

In post 2009, Solstice wrote:

In post 2002, Dr Easy Bake wrote:I guarantee you I’ll catch at least one scum based off of the D2 reactions to the D1 elimination and the NK.

[ill hold you to it!]

[ (I see my partners point that DEB is generally low on lists but receives no pressure, and that is a fair one -- but if people approach those who go "D1 is useless" like I do, then voting him wouldn't do much anyway. so i think he would likely fail to receive pressure as either alignment. Maybe in a game with a really stagnant D1 he gets considered, but not one like this) ]

VOTE: Ircher

In post 2010, Solstice wrote:[that's an extraordinarily bad post if BM scum. "You know what?" reads kinda fake]

[Although.. i do struggle to see what the incentive for scum!Noraa is to defend scum!BM actually. Would be a fun whiteknighting play I guess, free cops being distracted or extra miselimination]

[i guess I find it odd Polar wants Double Trouble so vehemently when Dunn//Ircher are their first picks. hmph]

In post 2008, Solstice wrote:

In post 1883, Battle Mage wrote:Yes, Mastina is calling me confscum here, in the same way she did when we were Morning Mage.

[yeah that's what i was worried about. And you're assuming her reads are all off the mark, just like that game as well -- i just don't trust you two scumreading/pushing each other much lol]

In post 1884, Battle Mage wrote:interesting here you suggest you don't agree with Ircher defending me....yet you hadn't really commented on me at all prior to this.

Can you talk me through your read here?

[i think Double was confirm biased, more or less, early while scumreading you, i didn't find the whole searching for your name ordeal scummy. i also hilariously enough am not reading mastina's posts on why you're a liar much cause I think she suffers from some kind of bias as well]

[i am pretty bad at reading you, worse than you know, and I haven't really gotten any pings in either direction. I think you could be scum in spite of what i have seen from Double/mastina, and it's also very possible im discrediting mastina falsely. If i were confident in a townread i'd oppose the wagon but I am fine with it at the moment. I prefer Ircher/Creature though]

[i think your reads are largely good in 1912 although I'm unsure on Double being scummy.]

[I see that you found Norwe's interactions with you to be bad faith. The only problem is I'm not sure that necessitates him being scum at all]

[do you have an opinion on Ircher, btw?]

~Morning

In post 2454, pichu wrote:

In post 2008, Solstice wrote:

In post 1883, Battle Mage wrote:Yes, Mastina is calling me confscum here, in the same way she did when we were Morning Mage.

[yeah that's what i was worried about. And you're assuming her reads are all off the mark, just like that game as well -- i just don't trust you two scumreading/pushing each other much lol]

In post 1884, Battle Mage wrote:interesting here you suggest you don't agree with Ircher defending me....yet you hadn't really commented on me at all prior to this.

Can you talk me through your read here?

[i think Double was confirm biased, more or less, early while scumreading you, i didn't find the whole searching for your name ordeal scummy. i also hilariously enough am not reading mastina's posts on why you're a liar much cause I think she suffers from some kind of bias as well]

[i am pretty bad at reading you, worse than you know, and I haven't really gotten any pings in either direction. I think you could be scum in spite of what i have seen from Double/mastina, and it's also very possible im discrediting mastina falsely. If i were confident in a townread i'd oppose the wagon but I am fine with it at the moment. I prefer Ircher/Creature though]

[i think your reads are largely good in 1912 although I'm unsure on Double being scummy.]

[I see that you found Norwe's interactions with you to be bad faith. The only problem is I'm not sure that necessitates him being scum at all]

[do you have an opinion on Ircher, btw?]

~Morning

i find this post off as well but struggling to explain why
i think it comes down to mostly being

gut

the norwee take is too hand sanitizer cleany though
the take on BM himself also has a scummy line
the "If i were confident in a townread i'd oppose the wagon but I am fine with it at the moment."
you know what i mean????
someone help me articulate
it's like... she's making sure to VERY clearly outline her stance in a way where she's overdoing it and it comes off as unnatural
something like that

In post 2468, Spiffeh wrote:Guys I recently started playing League again