Page 99 of 105
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:47 am
by Flavor Leaf
Andres setup a situation where Geraint gets voted out today, then gets to beat me in the 1v1.
And Not Mafia to surface level to figure it out, and Plus still too new.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:47 am
by Flavor Leaf
Andres setup a situation where Geraint gets voted out today, then gets to beat me in the 1v1.
And Not Mafia to surface level to figure it out, and Plus still too new.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:49 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 545, Andresvmb wrote: In post 543, Flavor Leaf wrote:the fact only like Shelly stated anything about my wall post likely means I have strong reads considering not only did I actively do more work, my wagon sped up afterwards.
I thought your wall of reads was reasonable but I’m also biased since it looks like I’m your strongest TR.
In post 546, Andresvmb wrote:^I would maybe disagree on nopoint though. I don’t see the slot as Scummy. I thought that acknowledgment that the slip maybe wasn’t that to be a Towny response.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:50 am
by Flavor Leaf
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:50 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 691, Andresvmb wrote: In post 689, PlusJOYED wrote:I feel like while it does implicate shelly from end of day play, it's too obvious for shelly to kill titus. That's not really shelly's scum style at least in a vacuum. Shelly usually goes for PRs and is confident in their dayplay that they'd go another target. Rather I think scum is trying to get us on shelly.
Following that I think nopoint is more likely since they were on each other. I also think there's very likely at least 1 scum in the lurkers from end of day 1 or the inactives.
There’s no such thing as too Scummy to be Scum. If the end of day play makes shellyc look bad, then we shouldn’t shy away from looking there closely.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:51 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 694, PlusJOYED wrote:Nah I've got a solid TR on shelly despite them seeming scummy based on titus suspecting them. I'd rather go nopoint
In post 696, Flavor Leaf wrote:Yeah, I’ll vote Nopoint. Right now, I’m thinking
Nopoint, Plus, Shelley, could be wrong with Shelly, but they’re town reading me too hard for my liking.
I feel like Plus is scum who is trying to figure out if their partner is guiltied.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:52 am
by Andresvmb
What? I didn’t set anything up. That’s ridiculous. I would never have tried to steer the shot towards my Partner there, ever. I would have either kept quiet or agreed with you then, since if I’m Scum you had it all wrong Flavor. I don’t understand why you’re going down this path. Like I said I made a few mistakes, but c’mon you don’t seriously think I get this emotionally invested as Scum. You have said that yourself in the past.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:52 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 717, Flavor Leaf wrote:Dunn
Not Mafia
Geraint
Andres
Shelly
Hank
Johnny
Plusjoyed
Fuzzy
Nopoint
Unwnd
Probably where I'm at.
I'd say at least 2 scum in bottom group, possible scum in that shelly, hank, johnny. But all 3 could be in that bottom.
In post 718, Flavor Leaf wrote:No ranking between tiers.
geraint i think has been genuine, I thought they were townie day 1 too, their comment is weird if coming from scum on Dunn/Not Mafia.
Andres hasn't done much, but they've been here to talk, and I feel they would have done more if they were scum.
Shelly put me as a town read in a spot I think it would have been good to let me get momentum, so if she is scum, she actively prevented me from gaining momentum, and with the no fade, I think this is weird, however i'm weak to pocketing, and Titus was pushing her.
Hank hasn't done anything scummy to me, day 1 it's more okay than day 2. I hope they can town it up.
johnny, eh, i remember them a bit day 1, and they were doing stuff, and voting around, but they werent able to get momentum, that's why they're there.
plusjoyed I mentioned earlier. I think they were distancing from Nopoint in case one of them were guiltied, but this is more reliant on both of them. I still think Plus probably thought someone was guiltied and got worried.
Fuzzy has played pretty poorly this game, I feel. most of their playing has been "flavor and titus are good, let's kill them because they have a good scum game.", and Titus dying I think leads back to them more.
Nopoint has been scummy most of the game, this carries over from my day 1. Their posts just seem kinda fake, nothing in particular has been "bad", but they seem like they don't believe what they're saying, also I think they have connections to Plusjoyed because of my Plus case.
Unwnd was playing the "this is how it should be played" game, and i thought it was NAI at first, but I feel they can be using that as an excuse and almost choosing to play that act this game.
I think all 3 scum are in those 4, however, if I'm wrong in that, it's 1 of the 3 in the tier above.
In post 720, Flavor Leaf wrote:1.04
[3]: nopointinactingup#293, unwnd#339,
1.05
[4]: unwnd#339,
Dunnstral#343, Titus#503, Not_Mafia#509
Hank Spankems#69, PlusJOYED#365
[3]:
Andresvmb#403, nopointinactingup#548
1.06
shellyc [3]: nopointinactingup#599,
, JohnnyFarrar#647
[4]: unwnd#339,
Dunnstral#343, Titus#503, Not_Mafia#509
Unwnd is scum by VCA. 1.04 to 1.05 no point looks like scum trying to get off the wagon that looks to be gaining, but the Not Mafia wagon likely has a scum on it, which does fit with my Plus theory.
In post 722, PlusJOYED wrote: In post 717, Flavor Leaf wrote:Dunn
Not Mafia
Geraint
Andres
Shelly
Hank
Johnny
Plusjoyed
Fuzzy
Nopoint
Unwnd
Probably where I'm at.
I'd say at least 2 scum in bottom group, possible scum in that shelly, hank, johnny. But all 3 could be in that bottom.
cool, let's go nopoint together.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:53 am
by PlusJOYED
well, I'll wait what dunn has to say before voting
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:53 am
by Not_Mafia
So nopoint lists her partners as her top two townreads?
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:54 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 729, unwnd wrote:A lot of my previous reads sorta became fleeting. I disliked Nopoint but it's been actual days and I can't remember the reason why. I can't read someone's mind but I imagine Shelly feels close to the same in terms of me. The M/O of most scum team is either 1) Control the gamestate 2) Operate in the gamestate. If scum were
controlling
the gamestate, then logic persists that Me/Flavor/Shelly would be in contention purely by the amount of seeming effort. I think Flavor is wrong about me and I think he's done some absolutely nonsensical posts, but that's a lot of extra for nothing gained. This gives me pause even if I initially was a bit annoyed people were townreading him. I think those people who are seemingly just being like, 'well, that's flavor being flavor' have more possibility to be scum who are only operating in the gamestate provided for them. This is not an absolute rather just an observation.
I mean this literally, but me and FL have provided provided more than 20% of the posts made, and then most of them are interacting with each other.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:55 am
by PlusJOYED
In post 2456, Andresvmb wrote:What? I didn’t set anything up. That’s ridiculous. I would never have tried to steer the shot towards my Partner there, ever. I would have either kept quiet or agreed with you then, since if I’m Scum you had it all wrong Flavor. I don’t understand why you’re going down this path. Like I said I made a few mistakes, but c’mon you don’t seriously think I get this emotionally invested as Scum. You have said that yourself in the past.
if you thought you were gonna get shot it might've been to set uwnd as the deepwolf or reverse psychology since I said I wouldn't trust you after shooting fuzzy.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:56 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 756, nopointinactingup wrote:Do you wanna be cheeky adhominem or do you want to actually respond to my points?
In post 548, nopointinactingup wrote:
Shelly, so instead of reading and meta-ing me yourself you went and asked Johnny? Seems a bit theatrical. And one thing I have to add, there's no use in meta-ing someone if you only read their scum game. For example, you keep saying I'm lurking but if you read any of my town games (from waaaaaaaay before) you will see that I have similar post frequency regardless of alignment because I like to read a whole bunch of stuff in succession it helps me keep track of what's happening in town
The difference is that I’m town-reading Johny despite the only game I’ve played with him he was scum. If you had the time to read my scum game why not skim my town game? Or is it just convenient not to? You pushing Johny to see me as scum was my point against you not the fact that you didn’t read my town game
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:56 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 766, Andresvmb wrote: In post 717, Flavor Leaf wrote:Dunn
Not Mafia
Geraint
Andres
Shelly
Hank
Johnny
Plusjoyed
Fuzzy
Nopoint
Unwnd
Probably where I'm at.
I'd say at least 2 scum in bottom group, possible scum in that shelly, hank, johnny. But all 3 could be in that bottom.
@unwnd remember, Flavor is saying that all of the Scum are in {plusJOYED, Fuzzy, nopoint, you}. Do you buy that? Because I don’t. Hank should be in everybody’s suspicious or null pile, for example. plusJOYED is actually trying even if I think they have a few things wrong.
TMI
UNVOTE: Flavor
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:56 am
by PlusJOYED
I'm gonna check d1 vote count since I think that'll give me my answer
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:58 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 770, unwnd wrote: In post 765, Andresvmb wrote: In post 745, shellyc wrote:fwiw i now sorta want to reverse my unwnd read
I feel like unwnd wants to strongarm the gamestate here
@unwnd talk to me about this post. Are you really all that sure about your view of the game? You seem to be partly defending two players {Shellyc, Flavor} that are more than happy to vote for you and throw you under the bus, because they post a lot? Quantity of posting for the two of them is not indicative of anything at all. Particularly for those two.
I've a reassessment about myself slightly unrelated to this game and I would like to follow through on it. The gist of it being that predetermined lims are almost always bad and give scum a lot of space to maneuver. Regardless of thieir post-count, the aimlessness I see is mostly because you have fleeting reads without prior substance. Do you think this would be an intentional move on Shelly's part? Flavor? Both of them feel like stubborn people and I'm not sure of what's left is actually AI.
In post 766, Andresvmb wrote: In post 717, Flavor Leaf wrote:Dunn
Not Mafia
Geraint
Andres
Shelly
Hank
Johnny
Plusjoyed
Fuzzy
Nopoint
Unwnd
Probably where I'm at.
I'd say at least 2 scum in bottom group, possible scum in that shelly, hank, johnny. But all 3 could be in that bottom.
@unwnd remember, Flavor is saying that all of the Scum are in {plusJOYED, Fuzzy, nopoint, you}. Do you buy that? Because I don’t. Hank should be in everybody’s suspicious or null pile, for example. plusJOYED is actually trying even if I think they have a few things wrong.
He says a ton of things that feel really hard to grasp. I have to read mostly what he's pushing. If I were to separate Flavor from well, himself, I would definitely say that his posts are made only for show. I dislike this innately but I'm giving him space to show me if there's method in the madness or not.
literally talking to each other discrediting me.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:59 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 783, Flavor Leaf wrote: In post 766, Andresvmb wrote: In post 717, Flavor Leaf wrote:Dunn
Not Mafia
Geraint
Andres
Shelly
Hank
Johnny
Plusjoyed
Fuzzy
Nopoint
Unwnd
Probably where I'm at.
I'd say at least 2 scum in bottom group, possible scum in that shelly, hank, johnny. But all 3 could be in that bottom.
@unwnd remember, Flavor is saying that all of the Scum are in {plusJOYED, Fuzzy, nopoint, you}. Do you buy that? Because I don’t. Hank should be in everybody’s suspicious or null pile, for example. plusJOYED is actually trying even if I think they have a few things wrong.
I specifically stated at least 2 scum in the bottom group in the post that you quoted, and said "but all 3", why the misrep?
I caught Plusjoyed earlier in the year, and they were trying there too, what's that have to do with it? I specifically stated scum can be in the 3 person group, which includes Hank. That is my suspicious/null pile.
Misrepped me here.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:59 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 784, Flavor Leaf wrote: In post 776, Andresvmb wrote:If you ask me, I think Flavor needs to more conclusively demonstrate why nopoint makes sense as the execution.
I don't want Nopoint as the execution.
I want Unwnd.
I'm unsure why you keep misrepping my posts? I don't feel like it's on purpose, if that helps, but you probably need to reread my posts.
I did my VCA on Unwnd already to explain Unwnd Scum.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:00 pm
by PlusJOYED
hmm I thought uwnd and nopoint would vote together but maybe I was wrong
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:00 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 793, Flavor Leaf wrote:I am 90% sure Unwnd is scum, and I would have been okay flipping them with a coinflip odds.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:00 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 776, Andresvmb wrote:770 - unwnd I can’t fully understand what you’re saying here, so I’ll ask some questions.
Who do you think is pushing pre-determined executions? And who are you saying has reads without substance? If you’re speaking about my reads, I very much explained my read on Shellyc towards the beginning of today. Are you complaining about my TRs? I have made some arguments about nopoint before in D1. None of that has really changed.
If you’re speaking about Shellyc, she doesn’t have a choice. She had 3 people as Scum, one of which was NK’ed, one who claimed Cop (with no CC), and the other one who was the result of a check.
I also don’t get what being stubborn has anything to do with it. Flavor and Shellyc are stubborn, yes. So am I. So is Titus. What’s your point?
If you ask me, I think Flavor needs to more conclusively demonstrate why nopoint makes sense as the execution. There were some arguments about how the votes stacked up, but it’s an inscrutable argument because it has to assume that Flavor is Town, and no one knows that but Flavor. If you noticed, Flavor was voted yesterday by a Confirmed Town, and by Dunn/Not_Mafia at one point. Which is why Flavor is throwing shade to the only other person on their wagon. Again, I’m not buying it.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:00 pm
by Andresvmb
In post 2461, PlusJOYED wrote: In post 2456, Andresvmb wrote:What? I didn’t set anything up. That’s ridiculous. I would never have tried to steer the shot towards my Partner there, ever. I would have either kept quiet or agreed with you then, since if I’m Scum you had it all wrong Flavor. I don’t understand why you’re going down this path. Like I said I made a few mistakes, but c’mon you don’t seriously think I get this emotionally invested as Scum. You have said that yourself in the past.
if you thought you were gonna get shot it might've been to set uwnd as the deepwolf or reverse psychology since I said I wouldn't trust you after shooting fuzzy.
Do you really believe I would have trusted unwnd as the deep wolf? If I’m Scum I’ve played it a lot better. I would have used whatever clout I had left with you to try and direct the shot away from the Team, not towards my Partner. The Scum are in a horrendous position right now, where they have to win 2 1v1s to win. Nobody would willingly put themselves here.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:01 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 795, Flavor Leaf wrote:I feel like Unwnd is also trying to match his progression of me in Xenoblade, but I think it looks fake.
Him and I went at it all Day 1 there, then Day 2 he town read me, and I town read there.
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:01 pm
by Andresvmb
Flavor what the hell are you doing?
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2021 12:02 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 805, Flavor Leaf wrote:I have you considering me scum, Dunnstral/Not Mafia will hop on. Im sure Unwnd will hop on. Plus has stated their willingness, Nopoint is voting me, and Andres is setting up a turn as well.
Who do you have?
My gamestate analysis might have been incredibly correct. Nopoint/Unwnd/Andres setup was there to gain momentum on me. I felt it a lot at the time.