Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:35 am
Oh hi scum. No I don't want to lynch stevie until you're dead.
From the makers of the above post:In post 2352, Serene wrote:"Been trying to get reads to settle in my head the past couple of days."
For the past two days I've been lurking hard and have no reads whatsoever, sorry. I've even been scum-QT-prod. My head is dizzy and overly medicated and I have spells of amnesia and uncontrollable epileptic fits.
"I looked around a bit and didn't find a whole lot; not really that difficult with all the nonsense in the thread."
It's not my fault, it's your fault.
"The game's still moving pretty damn fast"
Being scum makes me lazy, don't expect reads anytime until the Apocalypse.
"but a lot of it is just talk that isn't really alignment-indicative either way"
Buddhascum says: "There is no good nor evil, only reincarnation into slime molds."
"I'll probably look into ProHawk sometime tomorrow to see if anyone's interactions with him stand out."
And by "probably" I mean "never" and I hope you'll soon forget that I made this promise. See you in LYLO, suckers!
You and I are in-thread masoning right nowIn post 2478, BROseidon wrote:Serene you're wrong. Double negative != positive in all languages or even English dialects.
It wasn't a double negative. It was flat out a yes or no question to which he responded no.In post 2478, BROseidon wrote:Serene you're wrong. Double negative != positive in all languages or even English dialects.
I do not believe the claim AT ALL. From DAY 1 when it was revealed by you when Dramonic was getting a wagon started, I've not believed it. Not once.In post 2468, Serene wrote:How did Zdenek twist your words?
Asked: DO YOU DISBELIEVE THE CLAIM
Answer: (YOU) No I do not
Answer from Bulba: No but Fenix does.
He is not twisting your words, you flat out said you did not disbelieve.
No. I just don't believe you one fucking bit. You spearheaded a campaign against Nero which turned up Nero flipping town. You're "mason" is coasting by and doing jack dick, only voting when it's relevant for a wagon and then disappearing again.Serene wrote:It is the opinion of the Serene ones that your apparent dissonance is for a twofold reason: you wish to instill a sense of townie paranoia without going at us too hard, and further you fear confirming too many townsmen via POE later down the line.
You're post reads as very WIFOM. But, I will show the facts of why I think they are scum.DOMO wrote:Ok fenix, but you're failing to show how such a fakeclaim can be a viable stratgey. It's all very well coasting by on day two, but how are they going to explain how they're still around in endgame? That's assuming they don't get picked off by another scum team, and if we are multiball, scum will know due to team size. So, for these two to fakeclaim masons successfully, they need to know there's no other scum team, they need to gamble there's no actual masons to counterclaim (it only takes one), and they need a bloody good reason for not getting killed if they're still around when numbers matter, a reason that I'm struggling to come up with.
So please, educate me, because way I see it, fakeclaiming mason with a buddy on day one is absolutely retarded, more so if multiball. It only takes on to die and the jig is up.
They're masons. Stop hiding behind hydra disagreements in order to muddy the waters.
I'd like for you to point out these "other" reasons. Just for clarification sake. Because it seems you have a shit reason for now.Zdenek wrote:In English and in this instance, the contradiction is clear. So Broseidon and Orc are dumb or scum (scum especially if BulbaFenix does flip town).
That said, it is possible that it was just a mistake, which is why I asked them about their hydra discussions. Apparently Fenix was adamant about tangoing with Serene today, but he's not done that at all, so I don't believe their explanation either.
There are also other reasons why they are scummy.
So they are a fantastic lynch.
I. do. not. believe. the. claim. at. all.In post 2484, Serene wrote:It wasn't a double negative. It was flat out a yes or no question to which he responded no.In post 2478, BROseidon wrote:Serene you're wrong. Double negative != positive in all languages or even English dialects.
Considering that Serene just posted some, I'm not going to do this.In post 2485, BulbaFenix wrote:I'd like for you to point out these "other" reasons. Just for clarification sake. Because it seems you have a shit reason for now.
<3In post 2481, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:You and I are in-thread masoning right now
You're partially missing the point.In post 2490, BROseidon wrote:<3In post 2481, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:You and I are in-thread masoning right now
Do you still think Calcifer is the best lynch for today? I'm not seeing Calcifer as scummier than Stevie or DOMO.
pedit: HOLY FUCKING SHIT YOU GUYS DON'T GET IT.
IN MANY LANGUAGES, REGARDLESS OF WORDING, NO MEANS NO.
SO, FOR EXAMPLE, IF I AM ASKED "DO YOU NOT HAVE MONEY?" AND I RESPOND "NO," IN MANY LANGUAGES AND SOME DIALECTS OF ENGLISH THAT MEANS I DO NOT HAVE MONEY. IT'S WHY YOU HEAR MANY PEOPLE, PREDOMINANTLY FROM URBAN AREAS, SAY "I AINT GOT NO MONEY" TO MEAN "I HAVE NO MONEY."
GO STUDY SOME FUCKING LINGUISTICS BEFORE TRYING TO ARGUE LINGUISTICS WITH A LINGUIST.
Go read Fenix's posts today and tell me if they look like those of someone who was desperate to tango with Serene.In post 2496, Cephrir wrote:Bro wins the argument, the argument about that being a slip is now over.
There is a semi-valid point about BulbaFenix not going after Serene today except then they started doing it.
Yeah so basically apologies for my momentary lapse, BulbaFenix are still probably town.
"You're missing the point in that you blasted half my argument to smithereens so I'm going to keep arguing the other part of it".In post 2494, Zdenek wrote:You're partially missing the point.In post 2490, BROseidon wrote:<3In post 2481, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:You and I are in-thread masoning right now
Do you still think Calcifer is the best lynch for today? I'm not seeing Calcifer as scummier than Stevie or DOMO.
pedit: HOLY FUCKING SHIT YOU GUYS DON'T GET IT.
IN MANY LANGUAGES, REGARDLESS OF WORDING, NO MEANS NO.
SO, FOR EXAMPLE, IF I AM ASKED "DO YOU NOT HAVE MONEY?" AND I RESPOND "NO," IN MANY LANGUAGES AND SOME DIALECTS OF ENGLISH THAT MEANS I DO NOT HAVE MONEY. IT'S WHY YOU HEAR MANY PEOPLE, PREDOMINANTLY FROM URBAN AREAS, SAY "I AINT GOT NO MONEY" TO MEAN "I HAVE NO MONEY."
GO STUDY SOME FUCKING LINGUISTICS BEFORE TRYING TO ARGUE LINGUISTICS WITH A LINGUIST.
Go read Fenix's posts today and tell me if they look like those of someone who was desperate to tango with Serene.