Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2020 3:57 am
If anyone is tryna get SMACKED in Runeterra, hit me up.In post 2377, Double the Trouble wrote:maybe i should learn the new tft set or maybe learn legends of runeterra
If anyone is tryna get SMACKED in Runeterra, hit me up.In post 2377, Double the Trouble wrote:maybe i should learn the new tft set or maybe learn legends of runeterra
In post 2415, Battle Mage wrote:BM
Oh yeah it's bigIn post 2422, pichu wrote:must've been something big
See what ever happened to our alliance hectic.In post 2445, pichu wrote:Grumpy Cat is outed
This is not really impressive. Some quotes or links to the posts in question would also have been nice to verify your assertions for ourselves.In post 1802, Battle Mage wrote:page 31 - random splurge from Creature, but doesn't take the ready bait of directing DEB's vote. Maybe Creature-town more likely to do so, I know I would have.
page 32 - random attack from Double Trouble on Netflix and Chill. they have been quiet though. possible distancing?
page 33 - i'd forgotten about the random Informed Townie claim by Netflix and Chill. yeah, it feels a bit gambity, and the sort of thing Flavor might instruct someone to do.
page 34 - i know i say this in every mastina game, but the idea someone is "locktown" because they share 1 read with you is...not good.
page 35 - post 872 by Double Trouble is a little close to the bone. Hard to fathom why a town hydra ever makes a post considering how they can artificially make themselves seem more town.
page 36 - post 886 reads as genuine exasperation by Bell. mild carefree townvibe from Spiffeh.
I looked back at 1694 and 1763, and it does ping me a bit.In post 1808, Double the Trouble wrote:But for teh record
Yes
I don’t like Noraa’s soft defense of battle mage like, at all, and if battle mage flips red it’s super suspect
I don't like this post by Not Known 15. It's basically equivalent to saying we should ignore 90% of all evidence because Flavor Leaf might be manipulating it.In post 1810, Not Known 15 wrote:Don't forget: FL made a mistake by telling us they meta-ed everyone - it means that they'll likely be able to make meta less effective here.
As a result, you should throw all meta susceptible to FL intervention out of your reads
Seriously???In post 1822, Not Known 15 wrote:Ircher - DT could be S/SIn post 1212, Double the Trouble wrote:Ircher - I'd imagine more likely town than scum?
So basically DEB or Not Known 15. Well, Not Known 15 just had a string of bad posts, so neither are necessarily bad eliminations, but both would still amount to policy eliminations at this time. That's an issue since we won't gain much from the flip.In post 1823, Battle Mage wrote:page 51. I'm coming round to the idea that I'd like to elim a quieter low-profile slot today. seems to work a treat in large themes lately.
This is kinda a misrepresentation of Spiffeh's position. They don't want you dead; they just don't have any incentive to townread you whereas they do for the other three in Pooky's PoE.In post 1827, Battle Mage wrote:townpoints for Dunnstral. I still increasingly like Spiffeh even though he wants me dead.
I don't see how this is an issue, poe nonwithstanding. In fact, I'd rather you branch out your reads some more.In post 1860, MURDERCAT wrote:I know this isn't in the poe but I'm not sure I want to commit on BM/Ircher as of right now as I'm having second thoughts about Ircher.
Fine? That's it? You don't have a more in-depth read on them?In post 1873, Battle Mage wrote:they are fineIn post 1870, Double the Trouble wrote:What do you think about Polar Bears BM?
Maybe I misread, but I don't think they were claiming thatIn post 1914, Netflix and Chill wrote:I also don't really buy them thinking I'd want to see other people vote them and 'get data' from that and just think they were distracting from a potential Ircher wagon.
I can relate to this. This thread continues to move at a pace I cannot keep up with.In post 1915, Battle Mage wrote:Xenoblade was a bit more effortless because I didnt have to catch up 70 odd pages that I didn't experience in REAL TIME.
I think this is a good observation. (I admit I don't have the meta experience to verify it, but it seems reasonable enough.)In post 1916, Spiffeh wrote:I think Double the Trouble has been incredibly townie ever since being mentioned as part of the PoE elim list by Pooky
Like I expect scum!Alisae in that situation to just kinda freak out and tunnel someone else in that list and act super confident about getting a scum flip so e could brute eir way out of getting elimmed
But I feel like Alisae has kept an extremely level head and has kept sorting people as the priority which makes em more likely to be town
I thought it was a bad take as well. I do wish though that you popped in to say more than stuff like this that do really little to advance the game.In post 1922, MURDERCAT wrote:Kinda feels like you are trying to tie me to something you know will flip red tbhIn post 1913, Polar Bear Express wrote:If either BM or Double or Ircher flip red, Murder looks so crappy for trying to start a vanity here.
This is also a good observation. I think scum!Double does have high incentives to survive the day, so I would expect them to take low-risk options (like keeping a scumread on Dunnstral) that give a high payout in terms of increased survival.In post 1929, Spiffeh wrote:Alisae also backed off on Dunnstral, one of eir only options to push in order to not die today, after realizing myself and other players eir town reading are confidently town reading Dunny, when I'd expect scum!Alisae to continue pushing there purely to increase eir chance of survival
There's just a lot of avenues Alisae took that are the polar opposite to how I'd expect scum!Alisae to handle the situation eir in currently
In post 2485, MURDERCAT wrote:ur a wagob
In post 2484, Netflix and Chill wrote:Why are we wagobing this person