ITT, walls of text on Page 2 and earlier. I'm sure Jahudo expected as much with people like me in this game
VP Baltar 15 wrote:No, I wouldn't say nervous. I actually like playing with people who have more experience because it challenges you to play better.
Good answer. I think we'll get along well on a personal level.
PokerFace 21 wrote:Is this the first game you have played where you didn't want a random voting stage? If so any particular reason you didn't want one?
Yes, it is.
I wanted to try it because I saw a game where mith did something similar and I thought this player group was competent enough to try it. What I'd like to learn is whether it's easier to get out of this "leading discussion" phase and into serious play than going from an RVS to serious play.
Plus if someone says "hai gaiz" and votes we can all wagon that player for being a Philistine
So it's basically for academic reasons.
PokerFace 21 wrote:Bonus Question addressed to everyone:
Do you believe her and why?
Yes, I do. For one, I'm *cough* quite aware of the circumstances surrounding her departure from the site earlier, and accept her explanation for why she claimed. For two, I don't see her as scum claiming Miller just because from what I know of her, I wouldn't expect her to play such a gamble (especially with a player list like this!). For three, I also like that tactic, because it prevents me from having to answer a LOT of questions later on (see Mind Screw Gaiden, where I was told I would investigate as "Richard Nixon, Serial Killer" or the closest equivalent - what a nightmare that could have been). And for four, I really don't care much; I'd rather learn her alignment through her actions.
So what do I get for answering the Bonus Question
Rhinox 24 wrote:Also, anyone know anything about this Cowboy Bebop TV show? Until I got my role PM, I assumed we were all gonna be ridin' steers and square dancin'. Yee Haw!
Nope.
I've heard of the trope
Cowboy Bebop At His Computer, but that's it.
Do you have any questions for anyone else? Not asking any that you weren't asked yourself except for the flavor-based one seems somewhat weak at best. And by weak I mean scummy, and by scummy I mean "you know what happens when you catch my attention".
VP Baltar 25 wrote:Just thought of something else as well, it might actually be helpful to the town because if an investigative role did check Juls out and returned an innocent it would be a good indicator of that role's sanity.
Do you think it would be worth the Cop's time (and the Town's) to confirm sanity by basically blowing an investigation?
I guess it would also be good to note that sometimes Millerization is factored in after sanity (so an unknowing Naive Cop may investigate a Miller and get a Guilty result).
Perhaps the mod can clear this up?
ShadowGirl 27 wrote:No, I don't think you're scummy for skipping the RVS - perhaps the opposite, even.
Why?
Also, where did your username come from?
Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.