Seriously, am I crazy? The confirmed tree stump tried to place a vote, and WIFOM though it may be, I think it's early enough and he may have forgotten enough to at least help us believe that the person he voted is probably not aligned Littlefinger.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:23 am
by MagnaofIllusion
CES wrote:I only see greenknight.
So Monday escaped your detailed survey of the playerlist?
--
Deity wrote:*Brandishes a headsman's axe menacingly*
Please nod in response to this post by me if you are claiming a Post restriction as Ilyn Payne.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:25 am
by Empking
CES: Are you following me or is it coincidence?
Shadow; From your later posts it seems like you understood my reasoning.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:26 am
by Eddard Stark
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:27 am
by Cogito Ergo Sum
Unvote, vote: dgfas
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:27 am
by Shadow1psc
↑Empking wrote:CES: Are you following me or is it coincidence?
Shadow; From your later posts it seems like you understood my reasoning.
No, please clarify. Never assume anyone understands anything unless you spell it out.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:27 am
by zoraster
VOTE: Taena Merryweather
She, an exotic woman of no noble heritage, would rob me -- Lord of Harenthal -- of my ability to help rule this Kingdom. I do not doubt she has the Queen's ear, but the Queen has proven susceptible recently. It is time we remove this malignant influence on our realm's dealings.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:28 am
by Deity of Flame
VOTE: Taena Merryweather (shadow)
*hands Taena a piece of paper that says:*
"Taena Merryweather, be ye false to my queen? Your question shows no fault, but your reaction to sir Swann's push speaks of a man with something to hide. You place too much stock in what could've easily been a simple RVS vote."
"Taena Merryweather, be ye false to my queen? Your question shows no fault, but your reaction to sir Swann's push speaks of a man with something to hide. You place too much stock in what could've easily been a simple RVS vote."
RVS is not something taken lightly, at least it wasn't in Storm of Swords, we had this same exact problem and it spiraled out of control for like... 10 pages. He quoted me, unvoted, voted for me, and I didn't understand so I asked. Maybe that's how Empking works, I know not how many people play outside of who was in Storm of Swords.
↑Empking wrote:CES: Are you following me or is it coincidence?
Shadow; From your later posts it seems like you understood my reasoning.
No, please clarify. Never assume anyone understands anything unless you spell it out.
Telling Zor that he couldn't vote seems as if you're his ally.
If I was to vote you now it would be for your extreme anxiousness.
I was more questioning it out loud, it caught me by surprised that Littlefinger would make a 'slip' like that. But his next post more or less confirms my suspicion was off base. He's simply mocking me now, proving my wrong. WIFOM it was.
"Taena Merryweather, be ye false to my queen? Your question shows no fault, but your reaction to sir Swann's push speaks of a man with something to hide. You place too much stock in what could've easily been a simple RVS vote."
RVS is not something taken lightly, at least it wasn't in Storm of Swords, we had this same exact problem and it spiraled out of control for like... 10 pages. He quoted me, unvoted, voted for me, and I didn't understand so I asked. Maybe that's how Empking works, I know not how many people play outside of who was in Storm of Swords.
*hands slip of paper*
"Yes, RVS is serious and useful, but it's to feel for reactions to statements. Reactions like this. You had no real reason to respond with such furor here to a vote that didn't necessarily have any real commitment behind it. It speaks of over-defensiveness and nervousness, the mindset of a survivor concerned about protecting himself first and his king second."
"Taena Merryweather, be ye false to my queen? Your question shows no fault, but your reaction to sir Swann's push speaks of a man with something to hide. You place too much stock in what could've easily been a simple RVS vote."
RVS is not something taken lightly, at least it wasn't in Storm of Swords, we had this same exact problem and it spiraled out of control for like... 10 pages. He quoted me, unvoted, voted for me, and I didn't understand so I asked. Maybe that's how Empking works, I know not how many people play outside of who was in Storm of Swords.
*hands slip of paper*
"Yes, RVS is serious and useful, but it's to feel for reactions to statements. Reactions like this. You had no real reason to respond with such furor here to a vote that didn't necessarily have any real commitment behind it. It speaks of over-defensiveness and nervousness, the mindset of a survivor concerned about protecting himself first and his king second."
This all hinges on the belief that I'd be stupid enough to not realize saying something like that (as Empking described) would be incriminating. If I had OMGUSd or something, I could see the merit, but it's not like I was flailing around going 'OMG Y U VOTE ME?!'. I simply wanted to know Emp's stance, if he's a waffly player like Cogito seems to be, or if I should be taking his suspicions more seriously.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:44 am
by Deity of Flame
↑Magister Ludi wrote:The Lord of Highgarden has arrived!
*hands piece of paper*
"Lord Tyrell, you have throne in your lot with the iron throne, as the King's justice I must request your assistance in purging those disloyal in the courts. Remember that all who are disloyal shall be under the power of the King's justice, remember what happened to Eddard Stark who thought that he could oppose the throne and escape the justice of the king."
"Taena Merryweather, be ye false to my queen? Your question shows no fault, but your reaction to sir Swann's push speaks of a man with something to hide. You place too much stock in what could've easily been a simple RVS vote."
RVS is not something taken lightly, at least it wasn't in Storm of Swords, we had this same exact problem and it spiraled out of control for like... 10 pages. He quoted me, unvoted, voted for me, and I didn't understand so I asked. Maybe that's how Empking works, I know not how many people play outside of who was in Storm of Swords.
*hands slip of paper*
"Yes, RVS is serious and useful, but it's to feel for reactions to statements. Reactions like this. You had no real reason to respond with such furor here to a vote that didn't necessarily have any real commitment behind it. It speaks of over-defensiveness and nervousness, the mindset of a survivor concerned about protecting himself first and his king second."
This all hinges on the belief that I'd be stupid enough to not realize saying something like that (as Empking described) would be incriminating.
If I had OMGUSd or something, I could see the merit, but it's not like I was flailing around going 'OMG Y U VOTE ME?!'. I simply wanted to know Emp's stance, if he's a waffly player like Cogito seems to be, or if I should be taking his suspicions more seriously.
Did you say something just to incriminate yourself?
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:48 am
by Eddard Stark
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:49 am
by Magister Ludi
Ooba (Margaery Tyrell), MockingJaye (Olenna Tyrell), Plum (Loras Tyrell) to me!! There are traitors afoot!
And they may wear the favor of the king we all swore to protect!
Vote: Deity of Flame
~~
Magister Ludi (Mace Tyrell) Lord of Highgarden, Defender of the Marshes, High Marshal of The Reach and Warden of the South
"Taena Merryweather, be ye false to my queen? Your question shows no fault, but your reaction to sir Swann's push speaks of a man with something to hide. You place too much stock in what could've easily been a simple RVS vote."
RVS is not something taken lightly, at least it wasn't in Storm of Swords, we had this same exact problem and it spiraled out of control for like... 10 pages. He quoted me, unvoted, voted for me, and I didn't understand so I asked. Maybe that's how Empking works, I know not how many people play outside of who was in Storm of Swords.
*hands slip of paper*
"Yes, RVS is serious and useful, but it's to feel for reactions to statements. Reactions like this. You had no real reason to respond with such furor here to a vote that didn't necessarily have any real commitment behind it. It speaks of over-defensiveness and nervousness, the mindset of a survivor concerned about protecting himself first and his king second."
This all hinges on the belief that I'd be stupid enough to not realize saying something like that (as Empking described) would be incriminating.
If I had OMGUSd or something, I could see the merit, but it's not like I was flailing around going 'OMG Y U VOTE ME?!'. I simply wanted to know Emp's stance, if he's a waffly player like Cogito seems to be, or if I should be taking his suspicions more seriously.
Did you say something just to incriminate yourself?
Well now you're just being dense.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:52 am
by Magister Ludi
Quiet, knave.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:52 am
by Empking
↑Shadow1psc wrote:Well now you're just being dense.
Why did you say it then?
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:58 am
by Deity of Flame
Deity wrote:*Brandishes a headsman's axe menacingly*
Please nod in response to this post by me if you are claiming a Post restriction as Ilyn Payne.[/quote]
*shakes head*
*hands note*
"Just trying to maintain a tenor that I feel would be appropriate for my character. The King's justice was the position I desired most after all. I will however drop it if it proves to be a distraction."
"Taena Merryweather, be ye false to my queen? Your question shows no fault, but your reaction to sir Swann's push speaks of a man with something to hide. You place too much stock in what could've easily been a simple RVS vote."
RVS is not something taken lightly, at least it wasn't in Storm of Swords, we had this same exact problem and it spiraled out of control for like... 10 pages. He quoted me, unvoted, voted for me, and I didn't understand so I asked. Maybe that's how Empking works, I know not how many people play outside of who was in Storm of Swords.
*hands slip of paper*
"Yes, RVS is serious and useful, but it's to feel for reactions to statements. Reactions like this. You had no real reason to respond with such furor here to a vote that didn't necessarily have any real commitment behind it. It speaks of over-defensiveness and nervousness, the mindset of a survivor concerned about protecting himself first and his king second."
This all hinges on the belief that I'd be stupid enough to not realize saying something like that (as Empking described) would be incriminating. If I had OMGUSd or something, I could see the merit, but it's not like I was flailing around going 'OMG Y U VOTE ME?!'. I simply wanted to know Emp's stance, if he's a waffly player like Cogito seems to be, or if I should be taking his suspicions more seriously.
*hands slip of paper*
"So agents opposed to the crown would not do things that would show a tenor opposed to the crown because they would not want to be caught? No, I think you simply made an error of judgement out of nervousness. And yes, you do seem to be flailing, your response spoke of defensiveness since you already had a defense up before asking for a reason or asking whether it was serious. It's not just the defensiveness, the tenor your responses also speaks of a man with something to hide."
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:59 am
by Cogito Ergo Sum
↑Empking wrote:if he's a waffly player like Cogito seems to be
Deity wrote:*Brandishes a headsman's axe menacingly*
Please nod in response to this post by me if you are claiming a Post restriction as Ilyn Payne.[/quote]
*hands note*
"Just trying to maintain a tenor that I feel would be appropriate for my character. The King's justice was the position I desired most after all. I will however drop it if it proves to be a distraction."
↑Shadow1psc wrote:Well now you're just being dense.
Why did you say it then?
It means exactly what it says. Your argument hinges on the fact that you think I'm too stupid to avoid making a remark like that, when a remark like that is obviously something best suited for a quick topic involving allies. Your argument is that I sound like I'm coaching, or talking to a teammate, when obviously were we aligned and I concerned, there would have been a more appropriate way for me to convey it, and that I was too stupid and instead posted it in the game topic.