Stealing top of page for VC. Will get it done after this SC game.
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:15 pm
by borkjerfkin
TAM, I like that you're trying to establish accountability. I don't like that you see lurking in deviation of their answer to your question as a scumtell. People ignore games for tons of reasons. Do you plan to drive policy lynches when this happens?
RedPanda, re: your claim
What the hell?
Venmar wrote:Why are you trying to shut down RVS, the stage where we try to start discussion and get reactions going?
Why are you being obtuse?
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:21 pm
by RedPanda
↑Venmar wrote:- Could you explain to me how The Acting Method's two questions could possibly help or aid the scum in ANY way?
Can you explain to me how The acting method's two questions could possibly hep or aid the town in ANY way?
↑Venmar wrote:- Claiming already? Can you explain what is the your motivation behind your claim and why you did it?
I'm out for blood baby
↑Venmar wrote:- Why are you trying to shut down RVS, the stage where we try to start discussion and get reactions going?
lol. thats the only response I have for this question.
↑RedPanda wrote:if it can't help either side, then its pretty much useless not helpful isn't it?
Why post something useless and unhelpful in a game?
- How does this make TAM scummy? You're kind of clearly policy lynching now rather than scum lynching.
I'm sorry.
2 pages into the game and you want me to give you reasons more than that?
if he becomes useful. I'm going to take my vote from him.
If he doesn't then its blood.
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:31 pm
by RedPanda
And he has more than enough content now to start being useful
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:33 pm
by drmyshotgun
RedPanda is Town.
Venmar is probably Town.
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:35 pm
by RedPanda
↑drmyshotgun wrote:RedPanda is Town.
Venmar is probably Town.
comeon get dirty with us shotgun.
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:40 pm
by The Acting Method
↑borkjerfkin wrote:TAM, I like that you're trying to establish accountability. I don't like that you see lurking in deviation of their answer to your question as a scumtell. People ignore games for tons of reasons. Do you plan to drive policy lynches when this happens?
I only drive policy lynches on lurkers/inactives if there are one or two scenarios. The main one is:. They are posting elsewhere and ACTIVELY ignoring the game. If you aren't posting in any of the games you are in, that's one thing... If you are posting in All of your games save one, and you are not dead in that game that's scummy. Or at least anti town.
I'm more likely to pressure vote a lurker/inactive to boost their activity a little.
Also @RedPanda
So you are policy lynching me, for asking two questions because I like an active game because it's easier to catch scum that way? And could you at least answer the first one? At least it gives a time frame of when to expect an answer from you if you have a question asked at you.
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:40 pm
by drmyshotgun
Can I claim too?
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:46 pm
by RedPanda
↑The Acting Method wrote:I only drive policy lynches on lurkers/inactives if there are one or two scenarios. The main one is:. They are posting elsewhere and ACTIVELY ignoring the game. If you aren't posting in any of the games you are in, that's one thing... If you are posting in All of your games save one, and you are not dead in that game that's scummy. Or at least anti town.
↑The Acting Method wrote:So you are policy lynching me, for asking two questions because I like an active game because it's easier to catch scum that way? And could you at least answer the first one? At least it gives a time frame of when to expect an answer from you if you have a question asked at you.
If somebody posts in other games and doesn't post here. people are going to notice and call them out for it.
Okay RedPanda, explain this. Besides me, only 4 people have posted anything. Yet you expect me to start scumhunting this early?
Off of what, so far everyone seems pretty town to me. Because 8 people haven't posted yet. I'm including you as town because I think the scumminess I'm reading from you is playstyle.
@Everyone: What do you think of what is currently going on? Town vs. Town, Town vs. Scum, or Scum vs Scum. (Note, TvS only means that one is town the other is scum.)
Personally, I think it's Policy Lynching Town vs Town.
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:03 pm
by drmyshotgun
I claim Vanilla Townie VOTE: TAM
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:06 pm
by The Acting Method
@RedPanda: Why the early claim for no reason? If you are telling the truth all you are doing is narrowing down who the Masons are so the scum can kill. And if you are lying... See above.
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:11 pm
by drmyshotgun
So TAM, you instantly believe our claims just like that? Okay~
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:12 pm
by RedPanda
↑The Acting Method wrote:Okay RedPanda, explain this. Besides me, only 4 people have posted anything. Yet you expect me to start scumhunting this early?
good you're a smart cookie.
unvote
But why do you think shotgun venmar and bork are town?
↑The Acting Method wrote:@RedPanda: Why the early claim for no reason? If you are telling the truth all you are doing is narrowing down who the Masons are so the scum can kill. And if you are lying... See above.
you answered your own question.
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:14 pm
by RedPanda
↑drmyshotgun wrote:I claim Vanilla Townie VOTE: TAM
once we catch those 5 other VT's
this games going to be as easy as eating cake.
Let the townhunting begin.
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:14 pm
by RedPanda
↑borkjerfkin wrote:TAM, I like that you're trying to establish accountability. I don't like that you see lurking in deviation of their answer to your question as a scumtell. People ignore games for tons of reasons. Do you plan to drive policy lynches when this happens?
RedPanda, re: your claim
What the hell?
Venmar wrote:Why are you trying to shut down RVS, the stage where we try to start discussion and get reactions going?