Mafiascum.net

↑ Kcdaspot wrote:GREAT GAME GUYS LOVE THE ACTIVITY

meeeeeeeeeeeehhhhh.

UNVOTE:

we need people postin.

oh yeah and anyway

VOTE: Psyche

dat waffle

4 completed games, about 8 ongoing

I'd like to try Jester. Sounds fun.

Psyche, Arugula. I think Arugula has been in more games with me now than anyone else.

Something with hell crazy roles would be fun

bladerunner (hence the avi, plus it makes me look like the nice towny cop )

Knock yourselves out. Talk more. Let's go.

1. Uh, like 6 completed games and a bunch where I am dead or alive.
2. Doctor
3. Near, Tech, dicknose, Shattered Viewpoint
4. I always find lover setups interesting.
5. Final Destination movies

↑ Psyche wrote:It appears that I have made a grave mistake.

I shall wait to page 5 to evaluate proper course of action.

Lurking, scum? VOTE: Psyche

↑ TeChNoWC wrote:

↑ Kcdaspot wrote:GREAT GAME GUYS LOVE THE ACTIVITY

Unvote
Vote: Kcdaspot

Is Kc more or less disgusting than I am?

I've played between six and twelve games. I've played with Thor, Arugula, and Psyche.

Definitely more, for defaming Albert Einstein's face.

Even though you have a dick for a nose.

Is your vote on Psyche serious or non-serious?

I'm afraid you're confusing my name for a physical description. Every vote I've made has been serious. Why haven't yours?

↑ Bricktoes wrote:VOTE: Arugula

You thought Arugula was scum at this point?

What exactly about Psyche's post points towards him as lurker scum? You don't think he was joking when he said he was going to lurk until page 5?

How could any of my votes have been serious so far?

I voted Arugula to get a reaction. I didn't get one and not seeing anything to latch onto, I'm saving him for later.

I doubt Psyche's ability to predict how he'll post in the future, but I don't see his strategy to sit back and avoid the game as a town one.

Are you saying scum can't be among any of the seven players who have posted so far?

I doubt psyche was advocating any action like that. It was a joke.

What out of what I have said would suggest that I don't think scum could have posted already?

In terms of reaction testing, then yes, my second vote was 'serious', though reaction votes aren't exactly serious votes.

1. How much experience do you have with mafia?

2. Favourite role?

3. Who here have you played with before?







Competing wagons, ho. Psyche should come out here and comment on the catfight.

Actually,


Loving the pushy pushy no content posty there.

I have reason to believe Psyche will lurk as long as he can and will gladly hide behind the joke cover you've provided him.

You don't think it's possible to be voting seriously at this point, which would suggest you don't think it's possible to be scumhunting seriously and otherwise poking and prodding other players to figure out their alignment. Maybe that's down to different opinions of the word "serious," but I doubt you would say reaction voting and other alignmenthunting is taking the game lightly.

L-1

Someone should express willingness to hammer the obv. scum.

Giitah is also fairly obv. town methinks.

Dick and Tech are playing in the pool but are still trying to prove they should be allowed in.

Idiot who quickhammers is hammered into the floor tomorrow, names and pleas regardless;

↑ Thor665 wrote:Giitah is also fairly obv. town methinks.

Dick and Tech are playing in the pool but are still trying to prove they should be allowed in.

You're able to figure out Giitah's alignment after one post, but not others after several posts?

↑ Bricktoes wrote:I have reason to believe Psyche will lurk as long as he can and will gladly hide behind the joke cover you've provided him.

You don't think it's possible to be voting seriously at this point, which would suggest you don't think it's possible to be scumhunting seriously and otherwise poking and prodding other players to figure out their alignment. Maybe that's down to different opinions of the word "serious," but I doubt you would say reaction voting and other alignmenthunting is taking the game lightly.

That makes no sense. If Psyche was actually lurking, I would call him out on it. Me saying 'I don't think he was suggesting he will lurk' in no gives him a license to do so.

And yes, I would say we have differences of opinion on what 'serious' meant. When you voted Arugula, did you actually think he was likely scum?

↑ Thor665 wrote:

Unvote: Arugula
Vote: Kcdaspot

L-1

Someone should express willingness to hammer the obv. scum.

↑ Thor665 wrote:Giitah is also fairly obv. town methinks.

Dick and Tech are playing in the pool but are still trying to prove they should be allowed in.

You seem fairly confident in your reads there. Care to explain?

↑ Bricktoes wrote:You're able to figure out Giitah's alignment after one post, but not others after several posts?

Yes. Why is that odd to you?

↑ TeChNoWC wrote:You seem fairly confident in your reads there. Care to explain?

I'm a confident person so I tend to have confidence in myself and in my reads.

I'm watching Hetalia. Lemme alone. I'll post when I have something to say.

@Thor: Then can you share your thoughts on Gitah and Kcdaspot with us?

@Techno - certainly;

Giitah had a very stream of consciousness post, unless we presume it was a double blind fakeout what we're seeing is an open expression of suspecting someone and then changing of his mind. Scum would, on average, tend to try to tidy things up as it where. Make the vote on Kcad seem more direct and "honest" feeling. The sloppy method of it while being willing to show the slim thoughts behind it screams honesty to me, and that says obv. town.

Kcdaspot went out of his way to avoid discussing quite relevant things in thread. Even if he's a total dweeb he should have at least decided to comment about the person put to L-2 on Page 1, and then in addition to that he adds in posting about how we need more input,a dn then even slaps on a vote as if he just realized maybe he should be reacting to stuff happening, yet *still* fails to comment on much of anything and immediately leaps on the most blatant derp newb in the vicinity with his vote. I'm calling that pretty excellently obv. scum right there.

Why'd you vote Kcdaspot the scum?

I agree with you that it does make Gitah look towny, however 'stream of consciousness' posting is not uncommon for scum. I remember getting that as a towntell once when scum in mini 1332.

I'm not so sure I follow your reasoning on Kcd however. Who is the derp noob you refer to? Psyche? If so, I wouldn't refer to Psyche as a derb noob, but I am unaware how kcd might interpret his play I guess.
And I am guessing the 'dweeb' you referred to is Arugula. I also chose not to comment on this. Does that make me scum?

I voted Kcd, and quoted his post, to make it look like I was insinuating I thought he was scummy. He was quite vocal at the time and I thought he would react to it, and maybe I could gain something from the following interaction. However, he didn't bite.