Micro 142: Pokemon! [TEAM ROCKET VICTORY]

[JasonWazza]

Point taken, i may as well explain it then.

I'm a one shot day lie detector, what i'm going to do with it is this, instead of a claim "intent to hammer" will get me lie detecting the "i am town" post of a player, meaning instead of lynching them they become confirmed town instead.

[JasonWazza]

Also any protective roles will be on the conf. town.

[SleepyKrew]

I don't see why we don't claim our Pokemon. Jason first and then popcorn? Or just go down the playerlist in order (that means me first)?

I'm town btw

[shos]

Jee weez I AM TOWN
-_-
....amidoindisrite..?

Of course the mod confirms -__-; did you ask him by pm to say it loudly or did he do it by himself? At first i was thinking you're just faking but then i saw the mod editted his post after i posted my posts so.... >__>
The mod said that you're innocent child, but not your flavor. anything interesting there? i mean, let's rephrase that, should we ask questions about the rest of your role pm or not?

@sleepy: why would you want to do that. wouldn't it uh, expose info about roles.? i mean, from my pm i can only assume that getting a pokemon like dragonite cannot possibly be vt, so if one claims his pokemon it might hurt them...

[Zhero]

I am town.

[Zhero]

Not a fan of a nameclaim right now, I agree it could give scum a better idea of where town power is, and I'm not sure there's any real benefit.

VOTE: Ms Marangal

[Hyperion]

Vote: Sword

For repeating the ‘I am Town’ statement, seems like you’re a little too keen to push that idea through.

Also

Vote: Ravenpaw

For reminding me of harry potter for some reason

It’s weird you saying this because my avatar is Emma Watson lol.

Also for Jason: I am town.

So you voted Sword for the "I am town" statement ad then do the exact same thing?

VOTE: Ravenpaw
Also, for now I am against nameclaims

[Hyperion]

I am town.

[shos]

may I ask how 'later' you are planning to use that I am town thingie.?

also Hype got a point

VOTE: Ravenpaw

[Ms Marangal]

I am against name-claims and I also can't figure out why Sho would suggest that Jason should out his entire role PM. we don't want him to be a bigger target then he already is now. Mod also stated that there are no Vt's in this game in the OP so.

Pedit: Jason just admitted to also being a one-shot Lie detector

[JasonWazza]

Pedit: Jason just admitted to also being a one-shot Day Lie detector

FTFY

Also considering my pokemon i don't think that role really coresponds to pokemon.

But yeah i am against a name claim and i don't see any benefit other then locking scum into a name at the possible loss of good pokemon (and doc's may be obvious as i can only think of a few pokemon that would work)

Also @shos i didn't get a choice on timing sadly.

UNVOTE: TheNewEarth
VOTE: SleepyKrew

Just because i feel that may have been more scum motivated then town motivated.

[shos]

crap how did I miss this I seem to have entirely ignored the first two posts on this page. entirely.

point taken, but don't you dare misrep me, I did not suggest that jason outs his entire role pm, I specifically asked IF we should ask questions about it. I'll remind you that the post was made without reading 25-6.

~~~

should I make a different 'I am town' post just to make sure?

[shos]

eh well why wait for an answer anyway

I am town.

[SleepyKrew]

I'm fairly sure nobody is a VT...
Anyway yeah didn't think about how protective would be obvious.

[sword_of_omens]

ok then...
@JW - just so i understand...you have to wait until someone is at L-1 and then you can say "intent to hammer" and that will allow you to perform a lie detect on them?

If this is the case, then i suggest we don't wait until close to deadline to get the first wagon going, just in case they do come back as town, we might need some time to find a good counterlynch...
also for the first wagon, i suggest that the player need not role-claim at L-1, seeing as you can verify them...this might keep a town PR from outting himself to scum.

[JasonWazza]

ok then...
@JW - just so i understand...you have to wait until someone is at L-1 and then you can say "intent to hammer" and that will allow you to perform a lie detect on them?

If this is the case, then i suggest we don't wait until close to deadline to get the first wagon going, just in case they do come back as town, we might need some time to find a good counterlynch...
also for the first wagon, i suggest that the player need not role-claim at L-1, seeing as you can verify them...this might keep a town PR from outting himself to scum.

Yes i am waiting to L-1 to use this power, and that was practically the whole idea except for the part where the guy out's himself at all.

Also i want all Protective type roles on this guy that gets conf. town, do not WIFOM or i will hurt you.

I'm fairly sure nobody is a VT...
Anyway yeah didn't think about how protective would be obvious.

Have you ever played pokemon? >.>

[Ravenpaw]

Vote: Sword

For repeating the ‘I am Town’ statement, seems like you’re a little too keen to push that idea through.

Also

Vote: Ravenpaw

For reminding me of harry potter for some reason

It’s weird you saying this because my avatar is Emma Watson lol.

Also for Jason: I am town.

So you voted Sword for the "I am town" statement ad then do the exact same thing?

VOTE: Ravenpaw
Also, for now I am against nameclaims

No, Swords posted the “I am town” twice in his post (I bolded it below so you see it!):

Lol...JW..
Bad enough you claim IC....
don't try and paint a giant ass bullseye on yourself or nothing. ..


But sure. .. for easy viewing pleasure:

I am town

Also

Vote: Ravenpaw

For reminding me of harry potter for some reason

I am town

Did you not properly read his post or something?

may I ask how 'later' you are planning to use that I am town thingie.?

also Hype got a point

VOTE: Ravenpaw

You’re attack is not very effective shos, after seeing what I just wrote above do you still feel Hyper has a point?

[JasonWazza]

Ravenpaw seems really genuine to be honest.

[SleepyKrew]

Have you ever played pokemon? >.>

...Yes? Idk maybe I'm not understanding you. But based on my role PM I thought that uh how do I word this
I thought that abilities were up in the air
Like, Defense Curl for example. I can think of tons of things that that move could do in this game. I was thinking along the lines of moves and not the actual Pokemon themselves. Now that you pointed it out, obviously certain Pokemon would be more likely to have protective roles.

[JasonWazza]

Actually yeah i can understand that, my Fury Attack is the reason I'm an innocent child.

But i still feel like a doctor would be obvious etc.

(Also defense curl would totally be bullet proof?)

[SleepyKrew]

lol Fury Attack
Do you incessantly peck at us until we stop trying to lynch you?
And that's one of the many things it could be. And I was only thinking very narrowly. If Fury Attack = IC, then pretty much anything can be anything.

[Ms Marangal]

lol, Fury attack makes you an innocent child?

[shos]

Lol so many misunderstandings in one page. Ill grt a posy fone at home snd explain all

[JasonWazza]

lol, Fury attack makes you an innocent child?

Is there a problem with that?

Anyway enough speculating lets keep the scumhunting going rather then this.

[Zhero]

point taken, but don't you dare misrep me, I did not suggest that jason outs his entire role pm, I specifically asked IF we should ask questions about it. I'll remind you that the post was made without reading 25-6.

Lol so many misunderstandings in one page. Ill grt a posy fone at home snd explain all

This feels a bit overdefensive for not really having any suspicion lobbed at him. Though I admit I'm not really sure what post 47 even means..

UNVOTE:
VOTE: shos