Page 2 of 25
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:33 pm
by JasonWazza
Are these kids really choosing who the killer is randomly? Did they even examine the crime scene?
Vote Count 1.1
[2] Pirate Mollie: Pala, goodmorning,
[1] Seanald: sword_of_omens,
[1] sword_of_omens: zachattack,
[1] Blue Yoshi: Blue Yoshi,
Not voting: Syryana, Ms Marangal, ,pirate mollie, Seanald,
with 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch
Deadline:
(expired on 2013-04-16 15:57:31)
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:56 pm
by Ms Marangal
but Majiffy isn't here... how can you not follow the flow-chart if there is no flow-chart to follow?
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:52 am
by Syryana
A cursory examination of the crime scene reveals Ms Marangal to be killing people again.
VOTE: Ms Marangal
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 4:13 am
by Blue Yoshi
It's not like we have a forensics expert.
Also since there's only 2 mafia (according to the first post) one or both of them probably has some sort of special role.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:11 am
by sword_of_omens
Unvote:
(Although in my heart of hearts, i am still secretly voting for you, Seanald)
VOTE: Blue Yoshi
↑ Blue Yoshi wrote:It's not like we have a forensics expert.
heh...rolefish much?
↑ Blue Yoshi wrote:Well we already know there's 2 mafia
Blue Yoshi wrote:Also since there's only 2 mafia (according to the first post) one or both of them probably has some sort of special role.
This is the second time that you've stated there are 2 scum (#6 and #28)
saying it once was enough..and tbh, considering the size of the game it would most likely have 2 scum anyway.. but what i really don't like is that your wording seems a little defensive... you are already explaining how you know that there are 2 scum ...as if you are worried about drawing attention to yourself about knowing...
what you are doing is reiterating (twice, even) what was stated in the opening write-up...so you can appear to be helpful, when really all you are doing is telling us what we already know...
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:20 am
by goodmorning
↑ JasonWazza wrote:Using a flowchart where the only thing that flows is someone's ego is always ill advised.
<3 I knew there must have been a reason I /inned this. FOUND IT.
@zoo (if you don't mind this abbreviation): It's a nice thought, but the only tell I'm really getting from it is an overwhelming newb-tell. It is interesting though, I'll have to come back and look at it again in future.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:27 am
by Ms Marangal
shaddup Syr, leave me alone. I dun liek yew
Zoo is swords?
and I like Swords find as well, and what irks me particularly is that he states that right after Syr votes me... almost as if he wants to defend me from something, but I'm not sure as to what. Yoshi also has done nothing but set-up speculation, and a self-vote both of which are anti-town but it's early so I'm inclined to give him some slack
Yoshi, why defend me from a vote that's probably a joke? and are you planning on giving us some content soon?
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:27 am
by Blue Yoshi
I didn't expect many people to notice what I said in my first post, given it was in the confirming stage.
And I'm trying to kind of ease our way out of RVS with actual info.
sword_of_omens wrote:
↑ Blue Yoshi wrote:It's not like we have a forensics expert.
heh...rolefish much?
Considering it was in response to the flavor, nope.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:30 am
by Blue Yoshi
Not trying to defend anyone anyways.
I'd love to give info on other people but not many people have talked beyond RVS, and there's still not much to analyze there. Or really at all.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:41 am
by Seanald
↑ sword_of_omens wrote:hahaha!! a reprimand from Holmesies...
i think i'm going to enjoy this game...
Seanaldo, get in here so we can lynch you!
im here, let my day 1 wagon commence.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:45 am
by Seanald
↑ Blue Yoshi wrote:I didn't expect many people to notice what I said in my first post, given it was in the confirming stage.
And
I'm trying to kind of ease our way out of RVS with actual info
.
said every scum ever.
VOTE: blue yoshi
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:53 am
by Ms Marangal
↑ Seanald wrote: ↑ Blue Yoshi wrote:I didn't expect many people to notice what I said in my first post, given it was in the confirming stage.
And
I'm trying to kind of ease our way out of RVS with actual info
.
said every scum ever.
VOTE: blue yoshi
I actually disagree with this, I have said this more as town then as scum, and I have seen other townsmen do it as well. I'm not seeing how that post makes him scummy, though some of the other stuff do
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:08 am
by Blue Yoshi
Let's skip the point where there's no way what you're saying is true.
Considering you probably know that's not true why are you voting me for it?
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:47 am
by JasonWazza
↑ Blue Yoshi wrote:I didn't expect many people to notice what I said in my first post, given it was in the confirming stage.
Everything that is said means something, the detail is in finding what it means.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:01 am
by goodmorning
↑ Blue Yoshi wrote:Considering you probably know that's not true why are you voting me for it?
What makes you say this?
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:18 am
by Blue Yoshi
I'm wondering why he is voting for me for that reason, considering that reason is generally considered false.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:21 am
by Syryana
↑ Ms Marangal wrote:shaddup Syr, leave me alone. I dun liek yew
</3
UNVOTE:
I also rather like Swords' point about Yoshi. He does seem rather insistent on mentioning that there are 2 mafia.
↑ Blue Yoshi wrote:And I'm trying to kind of ease our way out of RVS with actual info.
I don't find this a scumtell for trying to get out of RVS like Seanald does, but something doesn't seem quite right about it either. All Yoshi has really talked about is the number of mafia and speculating that both of them have some kind of power. I guess I don't consider vague setup speculation as "actual info".
goodmorning wrote: ↑ Blue Yoshi wrote:Considering you probably know that's not true why are you voting me for it?
What makes you say this?
Also this.
VOTE: Blue Yoshi
And where the heck is mollie?
Pedit: Where are we getting "generally considered false" from?
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:28 am
by Seanald
yeah because it isnt considered false. I use the ohh im getting out of RVS stage as scum, and I dont think ive ever used it as town.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:40 am
by goodmorning
↑ Blue Yoshi wrote:I'm wondering why he is voting for me for that reason, considering that reason is generally considered false.
What reason are you referring to? What do you mean by "generally considered false"?
Do you know why I asked you?
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:43 am
by sword_of_omens
UNVOTE:
for now...
@Syr -
you do realize that you put Blue Yoshi @ L-1, right?
Would have been nice of you to announce that so we don't get an accidental speedlynch on page 2 before we can gain anything useful from this day...
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:47 am
by JasonWazza
Usefulness is an odd measure, we can't measure it accurately without knowing all the details.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:56 am
by goodmorning
↑ sword_of_omens wrote:@Syr -
you do realize that you put Blue Yoshi @ L-1, right?
This is interesting. I second the question.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:30 am
by Syryana
↑ sword_of_omens wrote:UNVOTE:
for now...
@Syr -
you do realize that you put Blue Yoshi @ L-1, right?
Would have been nice of you to announce that so we don't get an accidental speedlynch on page 2 before we can gain anything useful from this day...
L-1? I thought it was L-2. Damnit.
UNVOTE:
So sorry. He's still suspicious though.
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:09 am
by Ms Marangal
one of the main reasons to why I am careful with my vote
Syr putting Yoshi at L1 doesn't surprise me considering his Meta, but he also seems to be a whole lot less aggressive then he was when I replaced into that noobie game, and he's more apologetic which I find to be very interesting.
I'm concerned with the Yoshi flash wagon and I'm hoping to god that it wasn't scum driven
I can comfortably say that Swords is town and goodmorning might be, not to sure. the shiftiest on the wagon for me would be Syr and Seanald, though even with seanald, I'm doubting he's scum given his reasoning
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:45 am
by Blue Yoshi
Oh yeah I should probably UNVOTE: Blue Yoshi before I die.
Now to the rest of the wagon.
sword_of_omens:
2 good points. I didn't even think forensics expert was a real role, as I've said I was responding to the flavor. I wouldn't expect someone to go "oh lookie here i'm the forensics expert good guess". No one would even do that.
I wouldn't have expected everyone to actually read the whole first post and notice that we actually had 2 scum, and I don't know if people would have noticed my post in the confirmation stage.
His reasons are legitimately made and I don't consider this vote suspicious.
Seanald:
I honestly still don't know what to think of this one. You're saying trying to leave RVS is scummy? What the hell are you talking about.
The exaggeration doesn't really help either.
Syryana:
I see a combined sheep of sword and seanald. I don't know if this is hiding a sheep under a relatively big post or what, but it's not really good.
Also that L-1.