Mafiascum.net

Wagon time!

lol you guys are misspelling ac1983fan

-BadCop

In post 20, GoodCopBadCop wrote:All 3 posts have been brought to you by BadCop

Vote: ac1983fan

because I'm not scum w/ ac and I don't want to trip myself up on a technicality and start assuming that I am scum w/ ac

-BadCop

Does this mean goodcop might still be scum with him?

In post 24, NicCage wrote:VOTE: goodcopbadcop because cops cause me problems

Clearly means you'd investigate guilty.

scum found.

VOTE: NicCage

Such an interesting start this fine day!

VOTE: Varsoon Cause I like the way Toomai thinks

In post 25, Scott Brosius wrote:

Vote: GoodCopBadCop

Wagon time!

Let's not start a wagon against the biggest attention whore in the thread so far mmmmkay?

In post 22, GoodCopBadCop wrote:I'm a hydra of some sort

...

So how does your hydra work? Does one person post as BadCop and the other as GoodCop? Or do you both post as whatever character you like?

In post 28, Daemon385 wrote:Such an interesting start this fine day!

VOTE: Varsoon Cause I like the way Toomai thinks

Um. You know that Toomai isn't voting Varsoon right now... right?

In post 28, Daemon385 wrote:Such an interesting start this fine day!

Is this - like your vote - a fluffy introduction, or do you have a meaning behind the use of "interesting"?

In post 28, Daemon385 wrote:I like the way Toomai thinks

And how does Toomai think? Or is that two empty statements?

In post 25, Scott Brosius wrote:Wagon time!

Whenever I see something like this I go to my super secret lab and mark that person down as either "scummy" or just "lazy" (there is some potential to fill both categories).

Further testing is required, but the uh eyes are upon you.

In post 28, Daemon385 wrote:Such an interesting start this fine day!

VOTE: Varsoon Cause I like the way Toomai thinks

This looks pretty RVS (referencing my random vote), I don't know why people are jumping on it. Also it probably doesn't count since it's not bolded.

In post 29, hapahauli wrote:

In post 25, Scott Brosius wrote:

Vote: GoodCopBadCop

Wagon time!

Let's not start a wagon against the biggest attention whore in the thread so far mmmmkay?

Why not? Not sure I like how fast it built up, but as long as it doesn't go much further, I don't see the problem. A bold statement was made that people don't agree with, so we put on some votes to get explanation or reaction.

In post 21, hapahauli wrote:

hp [leaves wrote: post_id=4926404 time=1367613228 user_id=10128]VOTE: GoodCopBadCop because I don't like random votes

##Vote hp [leaves]

'Cause you don't like random votes yet are posting a random vote in the random voting stage... wat.

Nope, I voted for the person who random voted because I don't like random votes. Bulletproof logic if you ask me.

Also I'm calling it, everyone after me on the Cop wagon is scum.

So let's start by lynching Cage.

VOTE: NicCage

I'm not convinced about ac1983 fan

his vote was definitely trying to hide in the chaos, rather than contribute to creating order and information

hes scum basically

vote him

-BadCop

Why me and not Toomai?

Sup

Jake from Statefarm stop your "Sup" shennanigans and vote for NicCage already

-BadCop

No

In post 37, GoodCopBadCop wrote:I'm not convinced about ac1983 fan

his vote was definitely trying to hide in the chaos, rather than contribute to creating order and information

hes scum basically

Or maybe that was just, y'know, a random vote during the RVS?
But thank you for providing the overreaction necessary to get us out of RVS.
UNVOTE:

In post 23, Toomai wrote:

In post 19, GoodCopBadCop wrote:4 posts, 4 seperate votes on different people?

this is bullshit, all 3 of you are actively trying to reduce town's information thus the scumteam is HP, Toomai, and ac1983fan

Ridiculously terrible reasoning. Random is random; not joining wagons in the first 5 posts is beyond a null tell.

Vote: GoodCopBadCop

Voting someone because of ridiculously terrible reasoning during the RVS/ending of the RVS? it's like you've never played before

In post 31, Cheery Pie wrote:

In post 25, Scott Brosius wrote:Wagon time!

Whenever I see something like this I go to my super secret lab and mark that person down as either "scummy" or just "lazy" (there is some potential to fill both categories).

Further testing is required, but the

pie's

uh eyes are upon you.

No vote placed? Why not?

RVS wagons best way to get out of RVS.

In post 32, Toomai wrote:

In post 28, Daemon385 wrote:Such an interesting start this fine day!

VOTE: Varsoon Cause I like the way Toomai thinks

This looks pretty RVS (referencing my random vote), I don't know why people are jumping on it. Also it probably doesn't count since it's not bolded.

In post 29, hapahauli wrote:

In post 25, Scott Brosius wrote:

Vote: GoodCopBadCop

Wagon time!

Let's not start a wagon against the biggest attention whore in the thread so far mmmmkay?

Why not? Not sure I like how fast it built up, but as long as it doesn't go much further, I don't see the problem. A bold statement was made that people don't agree with, so we put on some votes to get explanation or reaction.

How fast it built up? Three people are on the wagon. The hap comment is weird too, stating that we shouldn't start a wagon against a vocal player.

All dese votes
I'm not going to RVS.

But Toomai put a vote on me and he jumped on that wagon real fast,

hp [leaves wrote: post_id=4928380 time=1367671065 user_id=10128]

In post 21, hapahauli wrote:

hp [leaves wrote: post_id=4926404 time=1367613228 user_id=10128]VOTE: GoodCopBadCop because I don't like random votes

##Vote hp [leaves]

'Cause you don't like random votes yet are posting a random vote in the random voting stage... wat.

Nope, I voted for the person who random voted because I don't like random votes. Bulletproof logic if you ask me.

So you want to policy lynch people who RVS. Given how many people do that on this site, you'd probably want to lynch off 90% of the forum.

Also, given the ease with which you moved your vote off, how is your vote any different from a random vote?

In post 37, GoodCopBadCop wrote:his vote was definitely trying to hide in the chaos, rather than contribute to creating order and information

Flurry of RVS activity at game start is hardly "chaos" in my opinion.

In post 43, ac1983fan wrote:Voting someone because of ridiculously terrible reasoning during the RVS/ending of the RVS? it's like you've never played before

I see your point, but from my perspective it was a serious kind of bad reasoning, given that he had already placed a random vote.

In post 44, Scott Brosius wrote:How fast it built up? Three people are on the wagon.

This is my first non-Newbie game; I'm not used to the larger number of players yet.

In post 46, hapahauli wrote:So you want to policy lynch people who RVS.

Votes generally do not exclusively mean "lynch this guy ASAP".

In post 32, Toomai wrote:

In post 29, hapahauli wrote:

In post 25, Scott Brosius wrote:

Vote: GoodCopBadCop

Wagon time!

Let's not start a wagon against the biggest attention whore in the thread so far mmmmkay?

Why not? Not sure I like how fast it built up, but as long as it doesn't go much further, I don't see the problem. A bold statement was made that people don't agree with, so we put on some votes to get explanation or reaction.

The only person that made a semi-justified vote on GoodCopBadCop was yourself. The other two were like "WAGON TIME I VOTE NOW YAY!" Justified voting is a fine way of pressuring someone for additional information. "WAGON TIME" isn't.

In post 44, Scott Brosius wrote: ...
How fast it built up? Three people are on the wagon. The hap comment is weird too,

stating that we shouldn't start a wagon against a vocal player

.

Holdonaminute. You apparently agree with my hesitancy about the GBGC "wagon" and find my comment weird. Thalk with me about that a bit.

Futhermore, the bolded is pretty straightforward and standard, no?

In post 47, Toomai wrote:

In post 46, hapahauli wrote:So you want to policy lynch people who RVS.

Votes generally do not exclusively mean "lynch this guy ASAP".

Of course. However I don't understand why he would vote someone on the basis that he hates RVS, while effectively making an RVS vote of his own.

It sounds to me like he's against it for no good reason, then begrudgingly "goes with the flow." I find that scummy, or at the very least something worth pursuing.

In post 45, Varsoon wrote:All dese votes
I'm not going to RVS.

But Toomai put a vote on me and he jumped on that wagon real fast,

So what does that make Toomai?

Also, surely you can comment on something else in these first two pages other than "half-insinuating" an OMGUS on Toomai. What do you think of HP and GBGC?