Mafiascum.net

In post 17, MattP wrote:I'm a vanilla townie

Why would you claim this?

In post 25, Ghostlin wrote: Why would you claim this?

I'll counter your question

What harm is there in claiming VT?

In post 26, MattP wrote:

In post 25, Ghostlin wrote: Why would you claim this?

I'll counter your question

What harm is there in claiming VT?

Define 'harm'. Three possibilities exist.

You could be an actual VT. In which case, you're telling the truth, no harm no foul. Although we're not massclaiming Day 1, or even all the VTs claiming Day 1.

You could be a PR that wants to claim VT to hide what you're doing. This, in and of itself isn't harmful to town.

You could be a scum, claiming VT in a bid to deflect suspicion on yourself. In which case this could be a gambit, and harmful to Town.

Do you see how in ANY of those three situations it would be harmful for me to divulge what I'm actually doing?

So my next question is, why did you ask me a stupid question

VOTE: MattP

Nope not doing theory discussion today

In post 15, Selkies wrote:I already have my lynchlist. You guys are so transparent.

-o

Selkies elaborate. Also I really want to keep my vote on Matt right now but youir 30 is making it hard for me.

VOTE: Demon

Better?

In post 27, Ghostlin wrote:

In post 26, MattP wrote:

In post 25, Ghostlin wrote: Why would you claim this?

I'll counter your question

What harm is there in claiming VT?

Define 'harm'. Three possibilities exist.

You could be an actual VT. In which case, you're telling the truth, no harm no foul. Although we're not massclaiming Day 1, or even all the VTs claiming Day 1.

You could be a PR that wants to claim VT to hide what you're doing. This, in and of itself isn't harmful to town.

You could be a scum, claiming VT in a bid to deflect suspicion on yourself. In which case this could be a gambit, and harmful to Town.

I fail to see how this line of questioning is helpful to town.

In post 15, Selkies wrote:I already have my lynchlist. You guys are so transparent.

LYNCH ALL LIARS!!!!

If Matt's aim was to argue theory, he could've easily breezed through what Ghostlin said because what he said was weak. Meaning it looks like Matt's trying to get a read on Ghost.

...Meaning you have now managed to make not 1 but 2 horrible votes in the course of 17 minutes.

VOTE: NicCage because gin.

VOTE: Nero

Because you're like Nero Chaos and goddammit you keep giving me bad ends.

[Sarcasm]
Such a great vote for Selkies. Best plan ever.
[/Sarcasm]

Maybe you should enlighten me.

In post 34, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 15, Selkies wrote:I already have my lynchlist. You guys are so transparent.

LYNCH ALL LIARS!!!!

vote: selkies

You're next.

In post 35, Demon wrote:

If Matt's aim was to argue theory, he could've easily breezed through what Ghostlin said because what he said was weak. Meaning it looks like Matt's trying to get a read on Ghost.

...Meaning you have now managed to make not 1 but 2 horrible votes in the course of 17 minutes.

Unvote, Vote: Selkies

I like how you tried to come up with a legitimate reason to disguise your OMGUS. Why not just play it as it is?

Your first paragraph makes no sense. Matt is trying to get Ghost to argue theory with him, no?

...

Come on man it's almost like you didn't even read my 31.

Keep preaching by the wiki... show me 3 examples where you've caught scum by using OMGUS

And no Matt is attacking Ghost's agenda.

Wake me up when RVS is over

- f

Wake me up when RVS is over

- f

In post 41, Selkies wrote:Wake me up when RVS is over

- f

In post 40, Demon wrote:...

Come on man it's almost like you didn't even read my 31.

Keep preaching by the wiki... show me 3 examples where you've caught scum by using OMGUS

And no Matt is attacking Ghost's agenda.

I never said OMGUS was scummy. Try again.

As far as I am concerned Matt is asking asinine questions and baiting ghost to sink into a deep shithole of theory discussion.

In post 44, Selkies wrote:I never said OMGUS was scummy. Try again.

Yup my bad there.

So you think Matt is being scummy and your vote is still on me for some unexplained reason...

In post 45, MattP wrote:VOTE: selkies

Nope, that's my tactic, not yours.

In post 46, Demon wrote:

In post 44, Selkies wrote:I never said OMGUS was scummy. Try again.

Yup my bad there.

So you think Matt is being scummy and your vote is still on me for some unexplained reason...

Not scummy. Just stupid and probably anti-town.

I'm voting you for the same reason I vote everyone in RVS.

And that's the second time you're pointing out something I didn't actually say

But that's okay, you're probably town.

VOTE: Matt

In post 34, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 15, Selkies wrote:I already have my lynchlist. You guys are so transparent.

LYNCH ALL LIARS!!!!

vote: selkies

don't feel left out, orcinus will get around to you.