I approve of this.In post 21, SafetyDance wrote:Harry Potter, Harry Potter!
Glad it's started, a lot of familiar faces too
So, uhh, yeah.
I approve of this.In post 21, SafetyDance wrote:Harry Potter, Harry Potter!
Glad it's started, a lot of familiar faces too
To quote many rebels, "Fuck you, I can do what I want?"In post 23, DoctorPepper wrote:How can you hate RVS and simultaneously not agree with people who share the same idea?
If it was only pseudo-serious, then there was a slight not serious element there. I won't say 'random', but you even downplayed the vote by saying it was only pseudo-serious, which is not something you usually do outside of RVS.In post 39, Saint wrote:"why participate as he kinda did in #8?"
how was i participating?
"why participate as he kinda did in #8?"how was i participating?
In post 38, Saint wrote:hahaha i just stumbled on this. If I go out, it will be posting this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reop2bXiNgk
So you're saying that you believed there was a good chance ArcAngel9 was scum for replying to someone's greeting and voting them? (I assumed that your use of 'pseudo-serious' was meant to mean 'sort of serious' rather than 'falsely serious', which appears to have been the correct interpretation) If so, can you point to something in ArcAngel9's history or your own experience to indicate that is the case?In post 39, Saint wrote:"why participate as he kinda did in #8?"
how was i participating?
this was bugging me, so I have to address it....
I was saying my vote was relatively serious, to try to create discussion, to end the RVS
I showed a pro-town action, because I HATE GETTING VOTED IN THE RVS WITH NO REASONING
i actually hate getting voted ANY TIME IN THE GAME with no reasoning
I like reasoning behind votes, to see who is feigning, and who is trying to decipher who is scum based upon it, GHOSTLIN.
So if you don't want to vote him but want to keep your word, why not vote and unvote? If you want RQS, try to start RQS. I've never played in a game with it, so I can't say from experience how it compares to RVS.In post 37, Saint wrote:vote: Safety_Dance blatant OMGUS, but I am a man of my word
I don't even really want to vote you - I like your name... I like the song... whatever.
I don't like the RVS. I would rather have RQS. RVS is idiotic. It creates silly wagons on town (AND LOW AND BEHOLD THE ONE BITCHING ABOUT THIS HAS A WAGON ON THEM HMMM)
vote: Safety_Dance
Never said I hate RVS, I'm just not looking for excuses to stay there. Happily someone pinged my scumdar with his theory that responding to a greeting and voting was scummy.In post 23, DoctorPepper wrote:How can you hate RVS and simultaneously not agree with people who share the same idea?
In what sense are you using 'opportunistic'? My interpretation of opportunistic votes being scummy is when scum see a lynch going down and hop on without much scrutiny. Being the second vote on a wagon hardly fits that. If by opportunistic you mean 'saw an opportunity to apply pressure to someone posting something scummy' then I'll agree, but I don't consider that scummy. And what do you think of Saint's response to having several votes on him, independent of my having placed one of them?In post 36, BROseidon wrote:Sheeping DV's vote. Duh
In all seriousness, penguin's vote seemed a bit opportunistic and there is enough in play to start moving out from RVS.
Another game with fuzzy! You scum bro? Guess I'll know if I'm around to see the night phase... #grudge #bitterIn post 25, fuzzybutternut wrote:I approve of this.In post 21, SafetyDance wrote:Harry Potter, Harry Potter!
Glad it's started, a lot of familiar faces too
So, uhh, yeah.
Why?In post 30, BROseidon wrote:My vote is for real now
Why?In post 29, DeasVail wrote:Townread on Fuzzy.
Why?In post 36, BROseidon wrote:Sheeping DV's vote. Duh
In post 15, DeasVail wrote:No, are you?In post 12, ArcAngel9 wrote:Hey Deas, its been a while since StreetRacers, so are you scum again?
Time to vote the one that's reaching.
Vote: Penguin_alien
Projecting, self-meta onto someone else. That always works.In post 41, Lord Mhork wrote:Anyone got meta on Saint? 'cause I threw this exact hissy fit back to back as scum.
Do you think AA is scummy? If so, why aren't you voting her? Care to elaborate on why you're notIn post 43, DeasVail wrote:Saint, why is SD a better vote than ArcAngel?
Wow. Have you had your inevitable, normal day one pressure put on you yet?In post 47, fuzzybutternut wrote:The sock is in the book.
Uhh, well, tbh, If I had to take a guess based off the content that has been given, I'd say that DP is scum buddies with DeasVail.
Awesome, lets have RQS! Yayyyy!In post 37, Saint wrote:DOBBY'S SOCK.
master gave dobby a sock
dobby is fweeeee
but for real, no, i was being serious, mhork, or whoever said that
if you want to push me, why are you voting PA? go ahead and vote me. At least, then, you can get some bloody analysis out of my RVS wagon
vote: Safety_Danceblatant OMGUS, but I am a man of my word
I don't even really want to vote you - I like your name... I like the song... whatever.
I don't like the RVS. I would rather have RQS. RVS is idiotic. It creates silly wagons on town (AND LOW AND BEHOLD THE ONE BITCHING ABOUT THIS HAS A WAGON ON THEM HMMM)
vote: Safety_Dance
It's a complete waste of time. I hate RQS. It just leads to random wagons on town.In post 46, penguin_alien wrote: So if you don't want to vote him but want to keep your word, why not vote and unvote? If you want RQS, try to start RQS. I've never played in a game with it, so I can't say from experience how it compares to RVS.