Mafiascum.net

In post 24, Cabd wrote:Oh, and the rest of you newbies. One thing that was in the links but I feel it's wise to re-iterate. Never EVER EVER self-hammer. No matter how much you want to "show us all" it's against your win condition. It has a few niche valuable uses as scum, but if you do it as town, you're essentially claiming scum.

tbh, it has no benefit for scum either, it's just stupid.

That being said, semi-serious vote.

UNVOTE: TheGarantula
VOTE: Derivan

In post 26, Fegelein wrote:

In post 24, Cabd wrote:Oh, and the rest of you newbies. One thing that was in the links but I feel it's wise to re-iterate. Never EVER EVER self-hammer. No matter how much you want to "show us all" it's against your win condition. It has a few niche valuable uses as scum, but if you do it as town, you're essentially claiming scum.

tbh, it has no benefit for scum either, it's just stupid.

That being said, semi-serious vote.

UNVOTE: TheGarantula
VOTE: Derivan

Actually scum have *Slight* benefit out of it, if a scum thinks there lynch is 100% and is basically confirmed scum, selfhammering can easily stop discussion on the town, especially when more conversation is needed.

Ahh, didn't think of that. Burnout + fatigue doesn't help my head.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... &start=425

That's an amazing example of it happening, read the game day, it's only 14 posts long and shows how a quickhammer can extremely hinder town.

In post 22, Darq wrote:VOTE: Guyett

For not having an avatar.

That better

In post 16, JasonWazza wrote:Be fun seeing IC goodmorning for once

Not too different from regular goodmorning, I should imagine.

In post 19, JasonWazza wrote:

VOTE: Goodmorning

Cause a cat is never good in the morning.

You can say that again, one of mine woke me up by stepping on my face.

But WHY ARE YOU SO OBSESSED WITH ME, HUH?

In post 24, Cabd wrote:Oh, and the rest of you newbies. One thing that was in the links but I feel it's wise to re-iterate. Never EVER EVER self-hammer. No matter how much you want to "show us all" it's against your win condition. It has a few niche valuable uses as scum, but if you do it as town, you're essentially claiming scum.

This could be worded better, and I would argue that it has a few niche valuable uses as Town too, but this is essentially true.

But WHY ARE YOU MAKING THINGS EASY FOR ME, HUH?

In post 26, Fegelein wrote:That being said, semi-serious vote.

UNVOTE: TheGarantula
VOTE: Derivan

But HOW IS THAT VOTE SEMI-SERIOUS ON A PLAYER WHO HASN'T EVEN SAID ANYTHING YET, HUH?

In post 30, Guyett wrote:

In post 22, Darq wrote:VOTE: Guyett

For not having an avatar.

That better

Yes.

But WHY ARE YOU NOT SCUMHUNTING OR SAYING LOTS OF WORDS WE CAN ANALYSE, HUH?



Actually I think on further reflection I should probably switch back to



I have a hunch.
(I should really spoiler this quotewall but there's not really any good way to break it down)

Hang on: HOLY SHIT CABD, YOU ACTUALLY READ THE LINKS?

I FEEL LIKE AN ACTUAL IC NOW

yes goodmorning but its still early days and I'm still getting used to things here
I dont know how much scumhunting can realistically be done in the first few hours unless someone has a complete meltdown.

In post 31, goodmorning wrote:

In post 16, JasonWazza wrote:Be fun seeing IC goodmorning for once

Not too different from regular goodmorning, I should imagine.

In post 19, JasonWazza wrote:

VOTE: Goodmorning

Cause a cat is never good in the morning.

You can say that again, one of mine woke me up by stepping on my face.

But WHY ARE YOU SO OBSESSED WITH ME, HUH?

Vote: Jason

I'm Obsessed with Nacho as well, don't feel special <3

But my vote is now semi-serious.

I'll explain why it was a semi-serious vote later.

In post 32, goodmorning wrote:Hang on: HOLY SHIT CABD, YOU ACTUALLY READ THE LINKS?

I FEEL LIKE AN ACTUAL IC NOW

Well, to be fair, I read them long before you posted them, but I did check them again to verify that the information I mentioned was there somewhere.

In post 34, JasonWazza wrote:I'm Obsessed with Nacho as well, don't feel special <3

That makes me feel more special, Nacho is awesome.

But my vote is now semi-serious.

Kay.

In post 35, Fegelein wrote:I'll explain why it was a semi-serious vote later.

Kay.

In post 36, Cabd wrote:Well, to be fair, I read them long before you posted them, but I did check them again to verify that the information I mentioned was there somewhere.

Still counts.

Hey guys...I'll get avatar soon.

Confirms

To reiterate:
VOTE: Fegelein
I WILL DESTROY YOU

I have no idea how to say your name T-T

In post 33, Guyett wrote: I dont know how much scumhunting can realistically be done in the first few hours unless someone has a complete meltdown.

I was reading the first few pages of some newbie games to get a feel for this site and it looks like a lot of the time somebody does end up having a meltdown

Excellent

darq
Last visited:
Thu Jun 13, 2013 1:01 am


Scum caught panicking? I wonder, I wonder. Wagon plz kthnx.

Last visited:
Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:00 pm

Now i'm sure of it.

In post 35, Fegelein wrote:I'll explain why it was a semi-serious vote later.

In post 43, Cabd wrote:Last visited:
Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:00 pm

Now i'm sure of it.

does seem quite suspicious

Activity tells are kinda... meh. I really hope that's not Feg's reason for "semi-serious"ing it.

Wow I was not paying attention because those are two different people whose usernames start with D.

Though come to think of it the reason could be the same, he was on during confirmation stage and didn't come confirm.

So yeah, I hope that's not Feg's reason.

My case is not a mere activity tell, mrs. kitty.

I keep almost calling you mala because yeah.... female cat avatars.