Well, I was going to suggest a policy lynch on IP -hey to you and NS btw -but it looks like it's already happening.
I'm still up for that, as though the guy seems a good laugh and all that, he will be a massive pain in the arse for town.
However, Darox seemed way to willing too get the guy up to near a lynch without asking ANY questions, so:
VOTE DAROX
Posted: Mon Jul 22, 2013 9:57 pm
by Darox
Coolguys:
Darox
Amrun
Mr. Flay
Potential Coolguys:
gorckat
spicer1209
Kid A
Ingrid
Disgraced Lamedudes:
notscience
mozamis
Spicer, you seem like an impressionable up and comer, you should get in on this bandwagon before Kid A & Ingrid show up and steal your coolguy spot. Just think about how envious your friends will be of your coolguy status.
In other news my previous post was mostly directed at notscience who was upset about something that didn't happen against a person he was voting. Irish is currently at L-3.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 12:14 am
by mozamis
I think it's pretty likely that NS just got the number wrong. Whatever. Putting someone at L-2 on page 1, without showing any curiousity, is scummy.
Why did you do it?
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:07 am
by Kid A
i was gonna say a mafia is on the tip wagon but then i realised im not on epicmafia?????
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:08 am
by Kid A
VOTE: mozamis
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:57 am
by saulres
Who was Melvil Dewey? As this game progresses, let's learn about the founder of something which is probably going to be obsolete by mid-century.
Or not. I may get bored with that.
With 10 alive it takes 6 to lynch
Deadline: (expired on 2013-08-05 22:23:44)
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 2:59 am
by Mr. Flay
Fair warning, I can pretty much only post from my phone during the day, so not much in-game posting. That said...
In post 22, spicer1209 wrote:L-1 on page one is quite ridiculous. Definitely keeping an eye on all those that have voted for TIP so far.
Why is it ridiculous to have a wagon on page one? Would you prefer some bullshit RVS for the requisite three pages?
Darox: why "ugh" with your vote?
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 3:08 am
by notscience
In post 27, mozamis wrote:I think it's pretty likely that NS just got the number wrong. Whatever. Putting someone at L-2 on page 1, without showing any curiousity, is scummy.
Why did you do it?
I forgot this was a mini, I'm used to 9p.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 6:10 am
by spicer1209
In post 31, Mr. Flay wrote:Fair warning, I can pretty much only post from my phone during the day, so not much in-game posting. That said...
In post 22, spicer1209 wrote:L-1 on page one is quite ridiculous. Definitely keeping an eye on all those that have voted for TIP so far.
Why is it ridiculous to have a wagon on page one? Would you prefer some bullshit RVS for the requisite three pages?
Darox: why "ugh" with your vote?
Because in my opinion rushing the day and wagon lynching like that doesn't give us nearly as much Info as taking slowing down a little bit. I mean say we lynched him on page two on day one, all we would get from that was TIP's role. If we took our time or at least didn't flash lynch him we would be able to get some insight into players meta and how they are reacting to certain things that are said, thus helping scumhunting. I think there will be a lot of potential knowledge lost it we just flash lynch him
In post 31, Mr. Flay wrote:Fair warning, I can pretty much only post from my phone during the day, so not much in-game posting. That said...
In post 22, spicer1209 wrote:L-1 on page one is quite ridiculous. Definitely keeping an eye on all those that have voted for TIP so far.
Why is it ridiculous to have a wagon on page one? Would you prefer some bullshit RVS for the requisite three pages?
Darox: why "ugh" with your vote?
Because in my opinion rushing the day and wagon lynching like that doesn't give us nearly as much Info as taking slowing down a little bit. I mean say we lynched him on page two on day one, all we would get from that was TIP's role. If we took our time or at least didn't flash lynch him we would be able to get some insight into players meta and how they are reacting to certain things that are said, thus helping scumhunting. I think there will be a lot of potential knowledge lost it we just flash lynch him
You do realize that no one is talking about a flash lynch, right? This is a bandwagon. It's part of how you play Mafia.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:33 am
by spicer1209
L-1 on page 2 is as close to a flash lynch as you can get without actually having one. I just think its a little excessive and dangerous for me thats all. Not to mention I'm sure there is at least one scum amongst the people that are trying to bandwagon TIP so keeping an eye on those who voted for him might not be a horrible idea.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 8:50 am
by Mr. Flay
HE WAS NEVER AT L-1! You admitted yourself in post 24 that you miscounted; Darox's vote only bright him up to L-2.
The Librarian looks at you. "Shhh!" she whispers. "No yelling. This is a library!"
Because the list is about who is wagoning you or not. Obviously.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:07 am
by spicer1209
In post 40, Mr. Flay wrote:HE WAS NEVER AT L-1! You admitted yourself in post 24 that you miscounted; Darox's vote only bright him up to L-2.
Well technically he was if you count gor's vote before he unvoted it in the same post haha. It all just seems a little to quick for me that's all
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:24 am
by gorckat
Post 30 he was L-3
No one voted before I did.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:25 am
by TheIrishPope
Lynch all Liars?
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:38 am
by spicer1209
Jesus Christ I'm mathematically challenged today. Either way I figure we were talking in hypotheticals as to why I would be against a big ass bandwagon and i still gave why.
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 9:57 am
by gorckat
@TIP: Poor application of the rule.
Equally plausible spicer was legit accidentally wrong about the numbers.
We should be poking the lion for the defense of you. Mo, too. Let's poke with pointed objects the people defending, or behaving defensively, a guy who claimed scum.
-but it looks like it's already happening.