Mafiascum.net

the period of darkness between sunset and sunrise.

Vote Count 1.01

Luna Lovegood

( 0 )

dopog

( 0 )

Dante

( 0 )

DeasVail

( 0 )

Shadowy Poison

( 0 )

Rail Tracer

( 0 )

PeaceBringer

( 1 ) dopog

theloveofneroandmollie

( 0 )

mnemonicdevice

( 0 )

ooba

( 0 )

Katsuki

( 0 )

Nani

( 0 )

Metal Unites Mutley

( 0 )

Viera Assassin

( 0 )

Vifam

( 0 )

SleepyKrew

( 5 ) Rail Tracer , BBmolla , theloveofneroandmollie , Viera Assassin , Katsuki

BBmolla

( 0 )

Not voting:

Luna Lovegood , Dante , DeasVail , Shadowy Poison , PeaceBringer , mnemonicdevice , ooba , SleepyKrew , Nani , Metal Unites Mutley , Vifam

With 17 alive, it takes 10 to lynch.

Deadline is in

can someone explain to me why there are some people not voting sleepykrew?

In post 26, BBmolla wrote:

@Mod: Can you confirm that 10 to lynch instead of 9 is correct?

Yes.

In post 27, Rail Tracer wrote:can someone explain to me why there are some people not voting sleepykrew?

All his buddies

Reason shall be disclosed later.

/buddyofSleepyKrew

In post 26, BBmolla wrote:@Mod: Can you confirm that 10 to lynch instead of 9 is correct?

The fact that its listed in the VC isn't good enough?

His vote count is wrong anyways since Kats is voting for SK.

So many cool people in this game

VOTE: viera assassin

cos I have no idea who he is.............

Should I even ask you your opinion of peacebringer?

Should I even ask you your opinion of peacebringer?

What would you like to know?

In post 32, Metal Unites Mutley wrote:So many cool people in this game

VOTE: viera assassin

cos I have no idea who he is.............

VOTE: MUM

In post 21, Luna Lovegood wrote:come here skrew i won't let that bully hydra hurt you
we'll be your foster parents when they abandon you in order to advance their horrible scum ways

This is an empty post.
(also <3)

we need to sign lol.....


-ms


we will get an avatar soon


also

In post 30, DeasVail wrote:

Vote: PeaceBringer

Reason shall be disclosed later.

/buddyofSleepyKrew

you do not need a reason... feel free to vote me without pretend reasons why

In post 4, SleepyKrew wrote:What is UP
I'm really excited
Also I'll probably be really

angry later

on so look out in case I go INCREDIBLE HULK

Also, my role is a

negative utility

.

So thinking it over, people are voting and calling SleepyKrew scum because of perhaps these 2 things. Now, as I read negative utility it is not declaring scum but declaring that his role has a negative impact on the village. So the player is town but may have some impact that does not benefit town. At any rate
, we need to know what the "negative utility" is because he/she/it boldy proclaimed having it...

In post 40, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 30, DeasVail wrote:

Vote: PeaceBringer

Reason shall be disclosed later.

/buddyofSleepyKrew

you do not need a reason... feel free to vote me without pretend reasons why

I like your attitude, but why do you think we would have a better idea than Sleepy Krew of whether it's best to specify his role?

In post 42, DeasVail wrote:

In post 40, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 30, DeasVail wrote:

Vote: PeaceBringer

Reason shall be disclosed later.

/buddyofSleepyKrew

you do not need a reason... feel free to vote me without pretend reasons why

I like your attitude, but why do you think

we would have a better idea

than Sleepy Krew of whether it's best to specify his role?

did I say that, um no. Sleepy Krew announced negative utility. Some bright players took that to mean he is announcing self as scum. Okay, so they are not the brightest bulb in the drawer, but still if you announce negative utility the reaction you get is what occured. May as well run up the claim, so who hops on and who does not. Then we can sort out what scum is likely to do...

In post 41, PeaceBringer wrote:we need to know what the "negative utility" is because he/she/it boldy proclaimed having it...

You did actually say it.

I think you are trying to follow the status quo in regard to SleepyKrew, but unlike others, you are trying very hard to rationalize it. The problem though, is that I don't believe you have any good reason to think that SleepyKrew should be run up to a claim (apart from the fact that it's what others are doing) and I don't think there is any good reason for it at all.

In post 44, DeasVail wrote:

In post 41, PeaceBringer wrote:we need to know what the "negative utility" is because he/she/it boldy proclaimed having it...

You did actually say it.

I think you are trying to follow the status quo in regard to SleepyKrew, but unlike others, you are trying very hard to rationalize it. The problem though, is that I don't believe you have any good reason to think that SleepyKrew should be run up to a claim (apart from the fact that it's what others are doing) and I don't think there is any good reason for it at all.

NO I DID NOT SAY WE WOULD HAVE A BETTER IDEA... I believe that if you go ahead and pronounce something such as negative utility you are asking to be run up, otherwise you announce what your negative ultility is. I unlike the folks who are not the sharpest knife on the tree. Sure, SleepyKrew can just be a naive moron who felt that was best thing to do. But let me ask you this, why if you have a negative utility role do you announce it? Does that make sense? Maybe you want to get run up, may be you want to see who jumps on, lots and lots of maybe's.

FYI_ my first jump into the thread was without thinking things throuhg and reading closely. See my title, bucko. I have now thought about it, and it deserves further exploration. But you on the other hand carry on. Feel free to twist or misperceive what I say, as it is fairly common.

peacebringer wrote:So thinking it over, people are voting and calling SleepyKrew scum because of perhaps these 2 things. Now, as I read negative utility it is not declaring scum but declaring that his role has a negative impact on the village. So the player is town but may have some impact that does not benefit town.

no, you have it all wrong. i'm voting him because i want to. and i'm calling him scum because why not?

peacebringer wrote:we need to know what the "negative utility" is

no we don't

In post 46, Rail Tracer wrote:

peacebringer wrote:So thinking it over, people are voting and calling SleepyKrew scum because of perhaps these 2 things. Now, as I read negative utility it is not declaring scum but declaring that his role has a negative impact on the village. So the player is town but may have some impact that does not benefit town.

no, you have it all wrong. i'm voting him because i want to. and i'm calling him scum because why not?

peacebringer wrote:we need to know what the "negative utility" is

no we don't

you have your opinion, I have mine... but carry on...scum

In post 46, Rail Tracer wrote:no we don't

heh, so you got a personal issue with the dude then- vendetta noted...

In post 48, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 46, Rail Tracer wrote:no we don't

heh, so you got a personal issue with the dude then- vendetta noted...

and what precisely do you think happens if you run someone up...
but hey, like you style, big fan.