Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:49 am
by Telo
The only game that I've played with one of the colored names he was in our mafia faction and he was the only one of us to get lynched. It seemed that people were excited to play with him like he was a celeb or something but that didn't make them listen to him and it didn't stop them from stringing him up.

Being well known might be a handicap because people know your play style so well they can tell when you're full of it.

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:49 pm
by quadz08
I was that guy, I think? I am not well-known for my prowess at playing the game (read: I am Bad At Mafia). I'm not influential with any established players, and any influence I do exert in games (which seems minimal at best from my perspective) comes solely from the colored name.

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:26 pm
by Nero Cain
No. No player is ever "on" every game and folks shouldn't sheep a player just 'cause they have a reputation.

Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:38 pm
by talah
Happy Birthday!

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 7:59 pm
by YellowKingValley
Appeal to authority.

Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2013 8:03 am
by sthar8
I very very very rarely get mislynched, excepting a run of meatworld mafia where I was policy lynched day 1 ~15 games in a row. The key to charisma is self-confidence, which can absolutely be learned.

Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2013 4:11 am
by Untrod Tripod
I've never really noticed that "influential players" are listened to moreso than just that "bad players" are ignored.

Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:21 am
by Tamuz
In post 29, YellowKingValley wrote:Appeal to authority.
What's wrong with an appeal to authority?

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:58 am
by YellowKingValley
In post 32, Tamuz wrote:What's wrong with an appeal to authority?
Nothing is wrong with appealing to authority. Circular reasoning can be true too.

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:39 am
by Benmage
In post 24, Vi wrote:I've been mislynched before, but only in games that are pretty much thoroughly FUBAR; Town has gone on to lose by a significant margin every time it's happened in the last four years. I imagine Faraday gets mislynched even less often.
The once in a blue blue moon I've been lynched as scum, has been by a PR outting cop, mafia 100... Years ago.. or the more recent 2 years or so ago game, original invictus, where it was an organized busing to propel scum victory!
-Think I've won all scum games for over 2 years now. (Minus fortnight... but etc)

As for town, slightly less, but extraordinarily rare as well.... I'd say usually ends poorly for town, and tends to be a result of headless paranoid mindfubared
chickens
people.

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 6:13 am
by Zachrulez
In post 24, Vi wrote:I've been mislynched before, but only in games that are pretty much thoroughly FUBAR; Town has gone on to lose by a significant margin every time it's happened in the last four years. I imagine Faraday gets mislynched even less often.
I had a streak of no mislynches that went all the way back to 2009 and was broken recently in a 3p micro where I got a role that played a part in dictating my lynch. Part of me doesn't even want to count it but... :( (Joining a 3p game like that is kinda asking to be lynched though isn't it?)

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:55 am
by Vi
In post 35, Zachrulez wrote:(Joining a 3p game like that is kinda asking to be lynched though isn't it?)
Joining games in general is kind of asking to be lynched, tbef.

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:23 pm
by kuribo
In post 34, Benmage wrote:(Minus fortnight... but etc)

i always say that not counting fortnight, I've been town in literally every game in over a year



neither of us count fortnight apparently since we're allowed to disqualify an outlier?

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:43 pm
by FakeGod
psssh I was mafia twice in my entire time on this site

Posted: Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:37 pm
by Tamuz
You're scum every game, you just happen to get sent a role with a town win con.

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:23 am
by ArcAngel9
Oh yes, I have had my moments on this site.
They were multiple times i was so correct with who is mafia in a game yet my reasons were ignored and those lnches wont passes through, mostly never.

I completely agree that a player influence is pretty high on this site... its more like a site META. you have an expereinced player in the game.. Just sheep him.... its the kind of behaviour most players displaying anand letting town loose game.

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 11:34 am
by Tamuz
Posted from my iPhone.

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 3:44 pm
by Eddard Stark
Yes, the argument that "if people have listened to me when I was right it'd own" is a convincing once. Most people tend to leave out all the (more frequent) times they're wrong though, but anyway.

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 7:42 pm
by Untrod Tripod
In post 40, ArcAngel9 wrote:They were multiple times i was so correct with who is mafia in a game yet my reasons were ignored and those lnches wont passes through, mostly never.
I wrote:I've never really noticed that "influential players" are listened to moreso than just that "bad players" are ignored.

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:27 pm
by Psyche
It's all a matter of shouting the right things loudly over and over again.

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:20 pm
by F-16_Fighting_Falcon
In post 40, ArcAngel9 wrote:Oh yes, I have had my moments on this site.
They were multiple times i was so correct with who is mafia in a game yet my reasons were ignored and those lnches wont passes through, mostly never.

I completely agree that a player influence is pretty high on this site... its more like a site META. you have an expereinced player in the game.. Just sheep him.... its the kind of behaviour most players displaying anand letting town loose game.
You have a good point but I don't think it is as simple as you make it out to be. Some players are good with ascertaining motivations of others and figuring out who the scum are. Some players are skilled at making convincing cases and pushing for lynches. If you find that you are often correct in your suspicions but that those players weren't lynched, it means that they were more skilled at presenting good cases than you, while you are more skilled than the other townies in deducing the motivations of players in the game.

For example if you were right about player M being mafia, and Townie T thinks that townie X is mafia and pushes a lynch successfully, it is clear that T is better than you at pushing cases and you are better than T at scumhunting. The best scumhunters aren't necessarily the most persuasive players. You are expecting someone who is worse scumhunter but a better case-pusher to have the same scumhunting ability as you while you don't seem to be able to match their persuasive ability.

Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 9:57 am
by Wake1
In post 0, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote: When someone that is well-known posts arguments for the lynch of a player, it almost always goes through whereas if a relatively unknown player does it, it takes a lot more time to push through the lynch. This usually doesn't even matter what their alignments are and whether or not they are leading mislynches.
Regarding the completed games I've been in, I get the feeling this is true.