Page 2 of 33
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:01 pm
by penguin_alien
And now I know how playing feels, the votes are always at your heels, it is the game.
These posts I write upon the site, they haunt me all throughout the night, it is the game!
Like a blur, I read the thread, the votes could see me dead...
With nine alive, it takes five to lynch!
Vote Count 1.01:
Lord Mhork (L-1): elleheathen, bv310, shos, funkybike
Malakittens (L-5):
Kazekirimaru (L-5):
bv310 (L-4): Maemuki
Maemuki (L-5):
shos (L-5):
Grimgroove (L-3): Malakittens, Lord Mhork
elleheathen (L-5):
funkybike1 (L-4): Kazekirimaru
Not voting: Grimgroove
V/LA: Malakittens through 10/8
Deadline is in
(expired on 2013-10-19 00:44:01)
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:05 pm
by penguin_alien
Mod disclaimer BTW: italicized content is purely recreational for flavor throughout the game.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:37 pm
by Malakittens
In post 18, funkybike1 wrote:
No, I am not. I am generally in support of them. I'm just not going to force the issue and put someone at L-2 twenty minutes into Day 1, before they've even had a chance to post.
In post 20, funkybike1 wrote:Part of it is my background as a player, where I was the victim of that kind of nonsense many times. I just want to give everyone a chance to post, after that, the game is on. Plus this is a Role Madness game, where a quicklynch might actually be worth it for scum.
In post 23, funkybike1 wrote: In post 22, Kazekirimaru wrote:
All the better, if you ask me. Coming on to find you're wagoned before you've even posted would make for such lovely interactions.
My vote is srs bsnz, by the way. Get voted at.
Those "lovely" interactions would just delay the meaningful discussion. And yes, an OMGUS vote during RVS is clearly serious business.
UNVOTE: Kazekirimaru
VOTE: Mhork
.
For what it's worth; I don't like you. Another thing I don't get is how you don't want to put someone to L-2, but are okay with putting someone at L-1. Noted that you clearly back tracked after someone called you out. This all makes me twitch. I can't wait for others to comment in regards to it. Now Funky, you and I are going to have an interesting conversation in a bit. Everyone should consider voting Funky for his back pedal. <3
VOTE: funky
I'm also sad that Peng didn't include pictures in her role PM's ):
I don't know how to do the coding...
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:57 pm
by funkybike1
In post 27, Malakittens wrote:
For what it's worth; I don't like you. Another thing I don't get is how you don't want to put someone to L-2, but are okay with putting someone at L-1. Noted that you clearly back tracked after someone called you out. This all makes me twitch. I can't wait for others to comment in regards to it. Now Funky, you and I are going to have an interesting conversation in a bit. Everyone should consider voting Funky for his back pedal. <3
VOTE: funky
I'm also sad that Peng didn't include pictures in her role PM's ):
A valid criticism. (Well, except for not liking me, of course.) But is it at all strange for someone to change his views - and his vote - when criticized for a previous vote? I explained my reasons for not immediately voting Grimgroove, and then I followed up by saying why I didn't. I was expecting a reaction for the Mhork vote, and I got one.
For what it's worth, I believe, from what few posts I've seen, that you are likely town. Scum probably would have not attacked me as overtly, if my prior experience means anything.
(Yes, I know this makes me a bit of a hypocrite. And yes, I am "backpedaling" again, if that's what you think.)
UNVOTE: Mhork
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:04 pm
by Malakittens
It's a game gut like not a literal dislike :p
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:26 pm
by Lord Mhork
Oh wow
VOTE: funkybike1
Pointing out that you're backpedaling doesn't make it any less sketch. You put me at L-1 on page one; you don't just drop it when someone points out what you did. In addition the fact you you seem to not have noticed the logical disconnect between your not liking putting someone at L-2 in the first page and putting me there with 5 posts of that. You don't even provide real rationale for jumping on me, implying that you're just bullshitting opinions.
Odds are you're probably town because very few scum are that dense, but it's definitely something worth pushing.
What exactly is your opinion of early game wagons?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:47 pm
by funkybike1
Sorry, I probably should have been more clear. What I dislike is putting someone under pressure before they can post. I'm fine with normal RVS.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:09 pm
by Lord Mhork
But you said you experienced early game derphammer stupidness didn't you?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:20 pm
by funkybike1
Yes I did, though that should hardly be an issue here unless the scum have no will to live.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:38 pm
by shos
In post 23, funkybike1 wrote: In post 22, Kazekirimaru wrote:
All the better, if you ask me. Coming on to find you're wagoned before you've even posted would make for such lovely interactions.
My vote is srs bsnz, by the way. Get voted at.
Those "lovely" interactions would just delay the meaningful discussion. And yes, an OMGUS vote during RVS is clearly serious business.
UNVOTE: Kazekirimaru
VOTE: Mhork
.
is a town post.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:38 pm
by Lord Mhork
Are you saying that I'm scum? I don't follow your thought there.
PEDIT:
Shos, elaborate please.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:18 pm
by elleheathen
^
Some wine and say what's going on?
Also, what's town about it?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:24 pm
by Lord Mhork
Wine and applesauce, elle dear.
*knuckle touch*
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:33 pm
by Kazekirimaru
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:16 pm
by shos
Scum would not mention it is an L-1. Definitely not stress it so much.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:16 pm
by Lord Mhork
...that's all you got?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:26 pm
by shos
Yes? Were you expecting a then page long case?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:38 pm
by Lord Mhork
I was expecting better rationale. You can hardly be that confident on the fact that he's town by him pointing out L-1. Post people would that out, town or scum. You just seem really, really confidant here.
Are you scum, Shos?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:38 pm
by elleheathen
Idk. I think scum would
absolutely
label it an L-1 because it's otherwise just screaming to be called out for it - and I don't see them wanting that kind of attention.
What do you think about it being a page 1 L:1?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:39 pm
by Lord Mhork
If you're asking me, I think it's almost totally null on all levels.
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:48 pm
by elleheathen
Not you - but cheers to that!
UNVOTE:
Because applesauce - and that wasn't a Thenardier scum slip, right?
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 7:52 pm
by Lord Mhork
No. I was actually listening to Les Mis and Beggers at the Feast was playing and then I figured I could do lyrics too.
I enjoy Les Mis. A lot. 0.0
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:50 pm
by bv310
In post 39, shos wrote:Scum would not mention it is an L-1. Definitely not stress it so much.
This is bad logic. It doesn't benefit scum to try and sneak in a lynch this early. They benefit as much as we do from longer days. Sneaking in a lynch is more likely to draw suspicion on them tomorrow.
unvote, vote: Shos
In post 46, Lord Mhork wrote:No. I was actually listening to Les Mis and Beggers at the Feast was playing and then I figured I could do lyrics too.
I enjoy Les Mis. A lot. 0.0
Musicals are my guilty pleasure. Have you seen the 25th anniversary concert for Les Mis and Phantom?
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2013 1:01 am
by shos
Of course it benefits scum to have a Quick lynch. I Always vote people for Putting people in l-1 with out saying it
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2013 1:21 am
by Maemuki
My collection of Les Miseràbles cast albums is potencially embarrasing. Seriously, I'm missing very few of them.
Also, shos, it benefits scum in a way (less townies) but it also leaves them at a disadvantage (because every other townie is now suspicious of them). So there's that.