Mafiascum.net

In post 21, undo wrote:Both of them.

This is simply the least synergistic playerlist I've seen in a long time. I mean, it's absurd when the only person I've played with before is Titus(btw Titus, I'm relying on you to have my back)! Well, no, I might have played with CDB sometime in the long-long past, I don't remember.

As to the second comment, reck and I are in the similar situation of having been banned from moderating and reduced to zero experience, forced to run a mini normal.

In post 24, Freak wrote:

In post 22, undo wrote:

In post 20, Freak wrote:yeah it's not my best comment. I could have made a better one, but then again...

Really? You acknowledged Aegor's argument? Now that's a bit suspicious.

now that's an interesting view. what's suspicious about aknowledging my comedy limits?

The way I see it: you random voted as is costumary in this stage of the game, presenting a silly - if entirely logical, in my opinion - reason for that (you were lazy and my name is only four letters). That's perfectly normal.

Then Aegor finds you're 'trying too hard' and votes you. But instead of shrugging and pointing out the obvious normality of your action, you actually acknowledged it was not your 'best comment', a comment that was supposed to be silly in the first place. In other words, instead of ignoring Aegor for trying to make a point on a seemingly contentless comment, you felt the need to recant.

Why would you do that, unless you were nervous and attempting to brush off the sudden attention you got (or could potentially get) because of Aegor's vote?

EBWOP: *'customary', not 'costumary'

In post 25, Natirasha wrote:

In post 21, undo wrote:Both of them.

This is simply the least synergistic playerlist I've seen in a long time. I mean, it's absurd when the only person I've played with before is Titus(btw Titus, I'm relying on you to have my back)! Well, no, I might have played with CDB sometime in the long-long past, I don't remember.[/url]

As to the second comment, reck and I are in the similar situation of having been banned from moderating and reduced to zero experience, forced to run a mini normal.

I see. Thank you for satisfying my curiosity.

undo, how about this: I agree with him. trying too hard to come up with something to say. And I like to keep my one-liners to a higher standard, so any feedback is appreciated.

And even if I didn't appreciate the comment, I don't see why I should've ignored him as you suggest. He addressed me, and we're trying to build discussion here. Anything now is good discussion in my book (yes, even your wall).

I thought Jordan was kidding at first, or maybe newTown, but votehopping like that and feigning forced outrage? Newscum.

Out of RVS on page 2!

Speaking of trying too hard
VOTE: undo

Meant to add reasoning - 416 posts is too many to not have a clue what RVS is, but new enough not to have a solid handle on scum strategy. Going out on a limb, first scum game?

In post 30, JKMatthews wrote:Speaking of trying too hard
VOTE: undo

Objectively worst vote of the game right now.

In post 29, Doc Holliday wrote:I thought Jordan was kidding at first, or maybe newTown, but votehopping like that and feigning forced outrage? Newscum.

Out of RVS on page 2!

Unvote
Vote: Jordan

so this isn't feigned?
just genuinely bad?

Obviously not feigned.

Aegor, your first post did not contain a vote.

Your next post, an hour later, saw you vote for Slandaar (who hadn't yet posted).

The post after that, you made your first 'real-ish' vote.

What happened in between your first and second posts that made you want to vote? Why didn't you vote in your first post? Why, when you did vote, did you vote for Slandaar rather than anyone else?



---

In post 25, Natirasha wrote:I might have played with CDB sometime in the long-long past, I don't remember.

The Upick that we were both in only just ended.

^goodposting

CDB is probTown

you're really flippant with reads, huh?

In post 38, ~Jordan` wrote:you're really flippant with reads, huh?

Who? Neither of the reads posted since your last were flippant, they both pretty clearly stated their reasoning.

In post 39, Doc Holliday wrote:

In post 38, ~Jordan` wrote:you're really flippant with reads, huh?

Who? Neither of the reads posted since your last were flippant, they both pretty clearly stated their reasoning.

Oh, you're referring to me calling CDB probTown. That was more obvious than I thought.

CDB is putting clear effort into sorting the good from the bad, and right away spotted a cognitive dissonance that I missed. That is not how scum tend to think, their cases tend to be built slowly and carefully, because they have to think about it more.

Should he not be?

Sorry i forgot you were in that game, CDB

Doc Holiday CDB Jordan undo all town 85%

In post 42, Natirasha wrote:Doc Holiday CDB Jordan undo all town 85%

Explain Jordan townread?

Jury's out on undo, but Jordan is reacting opposite of Townish, complete with soft ad homs

undo is typical oldbie going through culture shock.

Jordan too, but under emotional scrutiny comes up true. Less faithful in this read.

Won't have time for truly looking at all this until after the weekend, but Nat is town so far...

In post 20, Freak wrote:yeah it's not my best comment. I could have made a better one, but then again...

This seems odly stilted and a bit self centered to me. Worth a page 2 vote...

In post 28, Freak wrote:undo, how about this: I agree with him.

I was

trying too hard to come up with something to say. And I like to keep my one-liners to a higher standard, so any feedback is appreciated.

And even if I didn't appreciate the comment, I don't see why I should've ignored him as you suggest. He addressed me, and we're trying to build discussion here. Anything now is good discussion in my book (yes, even your wall).

asking how to look town. Lol... you call that a wall post. wait until page 10 or so. I'll show you a wall.

In post 29, Doc Holliday wrote:I thought Jordan was kidding at first, or maybe newTown, but votehopping like that and feigning forced outrage? Newscum.

Out of RVS on page 2!

Unvote
Vote: Jordan

Chainsaw... if that is still a thing.

In post 31, Doc Holliday wrote:Meant to add reasoning - 416 posts is too many to not have a clue what RVS is, but new enough not to have a solid handle on scum strategy. Going out on a limb, first scum game?

meh. Maybe. Not really sold on this argument. People vote hop a lot early on.

In post 32, Natirasha wrote:

In post 30, JKMatthews wrote:Speaking of trying too hard
VOTE: undo

Objectively worst vote of the game right now.

probably true. Don't understand the vote at all. I fail to see what is trying too hard. Undo's post seems reasonable enough.

The whole jordan doc thing is a bit of a wash for me. this is how I perceive it:
doc, "ehh, reads like new scum being vote hoppy"
jordan, "not a genuine post!!!!!!"
doc, "really... also, this guy looks town."
jordan, "ohhh really?"
doc, "lol???"

tit for tat on stupid shit. great start to the game. Leaves me at the exact same place I started at.

In post 42, Natirasha wrote:Doc Holiday CDB Jordan undo all town 85%

whatever happened to holding your town reads close to your chest for a while? seems like this game is going poe a little bit too early for my tastes.

VOTE: Doc

>50% chance scum.

In post 36, ChannelDelibird wrote:Aegor, your first post did not contain a vote.

Your next post, an hour later, saw you vote for Slandaar (who hadn't yet posted).

The post after that, you made your first 'real-ish' vote.

What happened in between your first and second posts that made you want to vote? Why didn't you vote in your first post? Why, when you did vote, did you vote for Slandaar rather than anyone else?

CDB probably scum too.

In post 40, Doc Holliday wrote:

In post 39, Doc Holliday wrote:

In post 38, ~Jordan` wrote:you're really flippant with reads, huh?

Who? Neither of the reads posted since your last were flippant, they both pretty clearly stated their reasoning.

Oh, you're referring to me calling CDB probTown. That was more obvious than I thought.

CDB is putting clear effort into sorting the good from the bad, and right away spotted a cognitive dissonance that I missed. That is not how scum tend to think, their cases tend to be built slowly and carefully, because they have to think about it more.

aren't scum also interested in sorting the good from the bad? why do scum have to thing "more"?

Wow. Lots of activity. Will catch up tomorrow. Prod dodging cuz birthday.