Mini 1568: Another Awesome Alliteration Adventure (over)
Forum rules
- Dunhamganger
- Dunhamganger
-
Dunhamganger
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 581
- Joined: August 24, 2012
Yeah, your vote wasn't one bit unlynchable.In post 27, Cho wrote:I am 100% confident that Cho, Elyse, and mnemonicdevice are Town for their votes. Accordingly, they are now Town Day 1 Unlynchables.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: MTD
Vote: Cho
Thanks for getting us out of RVS.
Ah, yes, it is true we were probably already a bit further than that, nothing intentional, just wanted to come in on the game and I hadn't really put any thought into it at that point. I am ok with Elyse's vote on me for that reason, maybe with Dunhamganger's, too, cause wooo, wagons, but I am p sure I want more than "yay these people are sooo town based on RVS votes" from Cho. Staying with my vote.
Also
@Elyse: Any reason you think mnemonics Vote was good? From my POV it just looks like a pretty dull RVS-OMGUS.
Also, The only other vote that I would maybe have found to be worth commenting on was burnings' for wagon-jumping much but Riptide already did that. Other than that I often don't find much to comment on in RVS.
Also
@Elyse: Any reason you think mnemonics Vote was good? From my POV it just looks like a pretty dull RVS-OMGUS.
Also, The only other vote that I would maybe have found to be worth commenting on was burnings' for wagon-jumping much but Riptide already did that. Other than that I often don't find much to comment on in RVS.
still the same old MTD
Oh gosh!
As a result, Cho, Elyse, and mnemonicdevice are exempt from much of my suspicion for today, provided that they don't royally fuck up, of course!
T S O
, how are we out of RVS now? Wasn't it already so earlier?MTD
, I feel wonderfully comfortable with Elyse and mnemonicdevice's RVS votes! Of course those votes don't mean they're town, but I found them much more pleasant than anything caledfwitch or Burning_Earth said.As a result, Cho, Elyse, and mnemonicdevice are exempt from much of my suspicion for today, provided that they don't royally fuck up, of course!
- Dunhamganger
- Dunhamganger
-
Dunhamganger
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 581
- Joined: August 24, 2012
Why should I have to address that, instead of other things you've said? (Your vote's not really that interesting, though your attitude certainly is!)
Forming RVS townreads in no way seriously confirms someone as town. Don't be silly. But if I have an RVS townread and happiness read on someone, unless their play drastically changes, I'm not going to want to lynch them at all!
How does me elaborating on my posts make me scum? As I see it, you're attacking me, so I should be expected to respond, no?
Lastly, why should we assume that this game is or isn't multiball? Regardless, you'll never be conftown, because you're being quite mean right now.
But if that's your intent, then so be it!
UNVOTE:
VOTE: T S O
Forming RVS townreads in no way seriously confirms someone as town. Don't be silly. But if I have an RVS townread and happiness read on someone, unless their play drastically changes, I'm not going to want to lynch them at all!
How does me elaborating on my posts make me scum? As I see it, you're attacking me, so I should be expected to respond, no?
Lastly, why should we assume that this game is or isn't multiball? Regardless, you'll never be conftown, because you're being quite mean right now.
Preview edit:
T S O
, you're quite a "force of nature", as some might say! The louder your thunder, the deafer we become~But if that's your intent, then so be it!
UNVOTE:
VOTE: T S O
- Dunhamganger
- Dunhamganger
-
Dunhamganger
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 581
- Joined: August 24, 2012
T S O
, I've already explained, dear! You clearly want this game to bend to your layers of self-confidence and false scumtells, but the more you speak out, screaming "look at how loud and consequently how open I'm being; you cannot hope to do anything but
townread me for my arrogance!", the more you detract from us being able to focus on the game and playerlist as a whole.And that's just not
right
, sadly.Preview edit:
Riptide
, yes, of course! Their votes and posts simply looked so comfortable. It certainly doesn't look like scum forcing themselves to play along with town's "true RVS" game, as may happen when scum are trying to choose whether to place their first vote on a teammate or not!Of course, this isn't a concrete towntell, as I've already explained. But I like their votes, and so far I like Elyse's style!
- 3dicerolling
- 3dicerolling
-
3dicerolling
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: December 15, 2013
I'm bad at this.In post 45, 3dicerolling wrote:So you see them as unlynchable, but not as concrete town?
Riptide
, nobody is concrete town at this point. It would be silly to make such an assumption of alignment so early on, when not everybody has even fully entered into the game so that we can even analyze themBut while I'm not allowing myself to completely exclude those players, Elyse in particular, from potentially being scum, I
am
allowing myself the small luxury of feeling like I can trust them for the time being. (Meaning, I'm not going to bother myself in trying to envision scenarios where they could be scum, at least for Day 1.)The term you used was "Unlynchables". Not Townreads. UNLYNCHABLES. Now, maybe this is a reaaalllly peculiar quirk of mine, but when I see an absolute term like Unlynchable, I assume it's serious. Maybe it's just me, though.In post 40, Cho wrote: Forming RVS townreads in no way seriously confirms someone as town. Don't be silly.
A townread and a happiness read. A happ-i-ness read.In post 40, Cho wrote:But if I have an RVS townread and happiness read on someone, unless their play drastically changes, I'm not going to want to lynch them at all!
What the actual fuck.
Elaborating isn't the problem here; you knew you'd slipped so you started backtracking, and you can see it clearly that your stances on your "Unlynchables" make no sense.In post 40, Cho wrote:How does me elaborating on my posts make me scum? As I see it, you're attacking me, so I should be expected to respond, no?
Assume non-multiball until proven multiball is my mantra regarding this.In post 40, Cho wrote:Lastly, why should we assume that this game is or isn't multiball?
You do not treat people as conftown because they are NICE to you. You treat them as conftown because they look Town, or do Town things. Niceness has nothing to do with this!In post 40, Cho wrote:Regardless, you'll never be conftown, because you're being quite mean right now.