↑Prof Fridays wrote:Just need to find that last scum and gg.
I have a really good feeling this is a slip.
Espressojet wrote:Is that not what the point of RVS is too? To create discussion to help scumhunting start?
What does this have anything to do with what I said?
First line: I disagree. Assumption of three members is standard from my experience.
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 5:09 pm
by Prof Fridays
Yup. I'd be surprised if it were any different. 2/13 is 15% and 4/13 is 31%, so neither is really plausible unless there are some serious power adjustments to compensate.
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 5:16 pm
by bjc
In any case I favor speed lynches. Either one of espresso and skot would do, not sire who I'd prefer. which one of you is a scum PR?
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:41 pm
by Marky Mark
As much as I find it a little scummy how SKOT is trying to show his innocence by use of randomisation, espresso's reaction to it is more noteworthy.
The change in tone of post between #12 and #14-#15 is staggering considering how close together the posts come.
With regard to #20 by Prof Friday about finding 3 Scum, it is something that anybody might say as it is the usual setup, but more likely to be said by scum as if there was 3 scum they would no for sure.
Albert - I am curious why you random voted for bjc in #4 straight after somebody else had random voted him?
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:40 pm
by Espressojet
I am a real person who has a real life outside of these forums. I was on my phone pre-show, and joking around with friends between the 15 minutes of the posts. Yes, my mood and tone are going to change between posts.
This is something a lot of people don't realize on these forums.
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 11:10 pm
by chaoslord54
I've been in a game with SKOT before in the past where he was town. He always uses random.org and posts it up in that manner. His actions are not scummy
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 11:11 pm
by chaoslord54
Vote:BJC
Don't really like your aggressive and pushy attitude to try and get SKOT or Espresso lynched. Even if you favor speed lynches, to try and get people lynched off of very little evidence screams scum to me
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 12:16 am
by Clusk92
Chaoslord is correct, SKOT's actions are null.
VOTE: Espressojet
Scum found.
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:30 am
by Marky Mark
Espresso's overreaction in #31 is screaming scum to me, the fact that he feels the need to defend his actions this early on and the emotional manner he does it in look very suspicious.
The way chaos not only defends skot in #32-33 but then goes sharply after his accuser also seems a little fishy this early in the game, and could potentially be a scumbuddy tell.
Don't really like your aggressive and pushy attitude to try and get SKOT or Espresso lynched. Even if you favor speed lynches, to try and get people lynched off of very little evidence screams scum to me
When espresso and skot flip scum you can stop playing and sheep me.
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 3:46 am
by Albert B. Rampage
↑Marky Mark wrote:Albert - I am curious why you random voted for bjc in #4 straight after somebody else had random voted him?
Bandwagons generate information.
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 3:49 am
by havingfitz
Was thinking of voting Espressojet before I realized I actually like my current vote.
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 5:19 am
by Anatole Kuragin
↑Clusk92 wrote:Chaoslord is correct, SKOT's actions are null.
↑Clusk92 wrote:Chaoslord is correct, SKOT's actions are null.
VOTE: Espressojet
Scum found.
VOTE: Clusk
I realise this is only page 2, but having this as the sum of your posts is bordering on lurking. Would also like to hear from Derivan and roflcopter if they ever turn up.
Albert B. Rampage wrote:
↑Marky Mark wrote:Albert - I am curious why you random voted for bjc in #4 straight after somebody else had random voted him?
Bandwagons generate information.
OK, I'll bite - so what did you learn from this one?
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:40 am
by Anatole Kuragin
You're right I should have just indulged in dumb RVS jokes rather than my usual winning strategy of voting the first person who says someone's actions are null - which has a 70% success rate.
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:56 am
by bjc
↑Anatole Kuragin wrote:You're right I should have just indulged in dumb RVS jokes rather than my usual winning strategy of voting the first person who says someone's actions are null - which has a 70% success rate.
Bullshit.
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:57 am
by bjc
vote: Anatole
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:58 am
by bjc
Looks like we solved the game prof.
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 7:59 am
by Anatole Kuragin
voting me has a 99% lose rate.
these are 100% accurate stats guys
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 8:11 am
by bjc
We're past rvs, no need to get cute avoiding the hot wagon(s).
Or do you really think he's scum?
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 8:50 am
by Derivan
Just confirmed. I have sporratic internet (due to being on a boat) so bear with me in advance. I think using a random number gen is a null tell and based on #31 I will...
VOTE: Espressojet
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 9:26 am
by Espressojet
It's just something that bothers me here, it's not specific to this thread. Things happen in life, my emotions change, and my mood with it. People keep getting on my case for change of tone and whatnot. It almost got me Iynched in my first game too.
In other news, Prof. Fridays has done no real scum hunting, so for the time being... VOTE: Prof. Fridays