Page 2 of 48
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:59 am
by SleepyKrew
Flames682
(4) - Tammy, phokdapolees, Elias_the_thief, AGar
rack
(1) - Aneninen
Tammy
(1) - Flames682
AGar
(1) - implosion
implosion
(1) shaddowez
Not Voting
(5) - Riabi, chaoslord54, Malakittens, tman2nd, rack
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Day 1 deadline will hit in: (expired on 2014-08-31 16:48:15)
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:27 pm
by implosion
↑ AGar wrote:
We have a sympathizer.
I never said Flames was scummy though. I said he had too many numbers and was being dumb.
And I never claimed to direct that line at you, it was a general observation in light of his being wagoned.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:34 pm
by tman2nd
Riabi hasn't been voted yet.
VOTE: Riabi
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:54 pm
by AGar
↑ implosion wrote: ↑ AGar wrote:
We have a sympathizer.
I never said Flames was scummy though. I said he had too many numbers and was being dumb.
And I never claimed to direct that line at you, it was a general observation in light of his being wagoned.
You followed up with a vote, then an "Oops, wrong vote." and switched.
Don't even try to play me a fool.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 1:26 pm
by implosion
My changing my vote has nothing to do with Flames not being scummy.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:08 pm
by Riabi
↑ tman2nd wrote:Riabi hasn't been voted yet.
VOTE: Riabi
VOTE: tman2nd
OMGUS.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:20 pm
by rack
VOTE: AGar
For getting that damned song stuck in my head.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:27 pm
by Malakittens
↑ tman2nd wrote:Riabi hasn't been voted yet.
VOTE: Riabi
Nor have I.
VOTE: riabi
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:36 pm
by implosion
Malakittens just lied
.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:04 pm
by phokdapolees
Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:16 pm
by tman2nd
↑ phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.
I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:20 pm
by implosion
↑ tman2nd wrote: ↑ phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.
I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
Nope. Flames said it was serious. Ipso facto, it was serious.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:26 pm
by rack
↑ Malakittens wrote: ↑ tman2nd wrote:Riabi hasn't been voted yet.
VOTE: Riabi
Nor have I.
VOTE: riabi
But...
But......
But, wouldn't it make more sense to vote for tman?
So confused.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:38 pm
by phokdapolees
↑ tman2nd wrote: ↑ phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.
I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
↑ Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy
Very serious vote pls lynch him
This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:50 pm
by implosion
VOTE: Rack
Serious vote.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:50 pm
by Flames682
↑ phokdapolees wrote: ↑ tman2nd wrote: ↑ phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.
I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
↑ Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy
Very serious vote pls lynch him
This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.
No it wasn't lol
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:55 pm
by phokdapolees
↑ Flames682 wrote: ↑ phokdapolees wrote: ↑ tman2nd wrote: ↑ phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.
I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
↑ Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy
Very serious vote pls lynch him
This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.
No it wasn't lol
In any case, Tammy's reaction to it was very scummy, regardless of whether the vote was serious or not.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:18 pm
by Malakittens
↑ rack wrote: ↑ Malakittens wrote: ↑ tman2nd wrote:Riabi hasn't been voted yet.
VOTE: Riabi
Nor have I.
VOTE: riabi
But...
But......
But, wouldn't it make more sense to vote for tman?
So confused.
Lmafo. I can't believe I actually did that.
VOTE: tman
(also imma probably keep forgetting 'bout this game. I never sign up for mini normals. this might actually be like 3rd if that on the site. ._.)
TAMMY
HEY
TAMMY.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:20 pm
by Malakittens
Phokd
you are threading in very dangerous waters
i applaud but you are gonna lose your life
if you keep going the way you are
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:21 pm
by phokdapolees
↑ Malakittens wrote:Phokd
you are threading in very dangerous waters
i applaud but you are gonna lose your life
if you keep going the way you are
I always lose my life, might as well lose it pushing scum.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:26 pm
by tman2nd
Reason?
↑ phokdapolees wrote: ↑ Flames682 wrote: ↑ phokdapolees wrote: ↑ tman2nd wrote: ↑ phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.
I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
↑ Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy
Very serious vote pls lynch him
This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.
No it wasn't lol
In any case, Tammy's reaction to it was very scummy, regardless of whether the vote was serious or not.
What was scummy about that reaction? He seemed to be continuing to joke around like they both had been.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:28 pm
by implosion
phok gets a very mild scumread.
@tman: post 37 is awkward. Lots of unwarranted ellipses, throw in a "so confused" at the end, and that's more than enough for a vote from me on page two. If desired I can explain in more depth why those are enough to warrant a vote from me on page two.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:56 pm
by AGar
↑ implosion wrote:My changing my vote has nothing to do with Flames not being scummy.
The vote at it's core does though.
That's what I'm saying.
You're a sympathizer, it's k.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:59 pm
by Flames682
↑ phokdapolees wrote: ↑ Flames682 wrote: ↑ phokdapolees wrote: ↑ tman2nd wrote: ↑ phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.
I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
↑ Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy
Very serious vote pls lynch him
This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.
No it wasn't lol
In any case, Tammy's reaction to it was very scummy, regardless of whether the vote was serious or not.
How was it scummy? We were both still joking.
I love when people give serious votes but give no reasoning at all.
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:38 pm
by AGar
↑ phokdapolees wrote: ↑ tman2nd wrote: ↑ phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.
I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
↑ Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy
Very serious vote pls lynch him
This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.
