Mafiascum.net

To try and better understand the wagon.

↑ Ki-Gi wrote:To try and better understand the wagon.

He voted the same person I did

When I did it you decided I wasn't town

But when he did it your stance is that his wagon is a bad wagon

I don't understand the cause of the discrepancy, and I don't see how your question gains you insight into the legitimacy of the wagon

Your vote was opportunistic because you tried to back it up with (poor) reasoning. His vote seemed random, blatantly without justification. It's scum motivation vs. WIFOM, I pick the former as more likely to be scum. My question could gain insight into the wagon to better understand his post (if it was to be answered), so I can therefore see if I'm missing something about it that makes it scummier.

I can dig that

I am Rene Fonck of France.

I'm Captain Basch von Ronsenberg!

Fluggernublet has the ugliest name/avatar combination I have ever seen.

I second that.

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ Ki-Gi wrote:To try and better understand the wagon.

He voted the same person I did

When I did it you decided I wasn't town

But when he did it your stance is that his wagon is a bad wagon

I don't understand the cause of the discrepancy, and I don't see how your question gains you insight into the legitimacy of the wagon

Why did you vote him?

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Why did you vote him?

Because it was something to do? I mean, it was the second post of the game, I assumed that intention would be pretty evident

Well technically it is self-evident that anything someone does is a thing to do because it was an action performed.

You should join my MattP wagon, AK.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Well technically it is self-evident that anything someone does is a thing to do because it was an action performed.

Ok, but I think this is especially appropriate sass on my part given that you're asking me about the second post of a game

Do you think because it was your second post of the game you should be immune to questioning about it?

↑ Ki-Gi wrote:and I don't think you're town bruh

↑ mykonian wrote:

↑ Ki-Gi wrote:and I don't think you're town bruh

vote kigi

I had already voted him at that point. Using that post to justify your vote there isn't convincing.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Do you think because it was your second post of the game you should be immune to questioning about it?

Of course not, but I do think me saying "Oh boy, no RVS!" and voting and then never returning to that subject paints a pretty legit picture of my intentions with that post to just "do something"

Ki-Gi, do you think it's likely that scum would drop a second-vote-on-wagon vote without explanation like that?

I don't think it's likely, no. Which is why I especially don't like Flubber's wagon.

So you don't think it's likely MattP is scum, you just want to get people to vote him to show disapproval of the flubber wagon?

Huh? I thought by second-vote-on-wagon vote you meant Flubber's vote on Csareo. I wasn't sure how serious the Flubber wagon was so if MattP was scum it would be easier to blend in in that case. It's the second page so I wouldn't call it a confident read but at the moment, I do think MattP is scum.

↑ mykonian wrote:

↑ Ki-Gi wrote:and I don't think you're town bruh

vote kigi

This vote is terrible.


Anatole: what's your take on rvs this far?

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Ki-Gi, do you think it's likely that scum would drop a second-vote-on-wagon vote without explanation like that?

↑ Ki-Gi wrote:I don't think it's likely, no. Which is why I especially don't like Flubber's wagon.

You said you don't think it's likely that scum would drop the second vote on a wagon without explanation, which is what Matt did.

Ftr on that note farside I think myko is actually scum

Anatole: ki explained here his reasoning do you think he sai this

↑ Ki-Gi wrote:Your vote was opportunistic because you tried to back it up with (poor) reasoning. His vote seemed random, blatantly without justification. It's scum motivation vs. WIFOM, I pick the former as more likely to be scum. My question could gain insight into the wagon to better understand his post (if it was to be answered), so I can therefore see if I'm missing something about it that makes it scummier.

Then said the second vote wasn't scummy is a scum tell?