Page 2 of 23

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 6:48 am
by fferyllt
Vote Count 1.2


Commercial announcing the 1999 Premiere of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart



ZeroSummer
(4): YurikoJasmine, BlueBloodedToffee, Draynth, MasonP
MasonP
(1): Dierfire

Not Voting
(4): Honest, Marklin, Axwell, ZeroSummer

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.


Deadline: August 10, Midnight US Eastern Time.

Countdown: (expired on 2015-08-09 21:00:00)

Mod Notes:

Axwell and Marklin have 6 hours in which to post before I must seek replacements.
- :]

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 7:03 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
Anyone hammers (votes) Zero without stating intent to hammer will be scum claiming and will be speed lynched on Day 2.

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 11:35 am
by Honest
VOTE: vote: bluebloodedtoffee

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 1:09 pm
by YurikoJasmine
BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
Yuri, what do YOU think about me trying to get people to vote for Zero?

I think it's pretty null. I know town you does it all the time early game but meta aside its not really alignment indicative

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 1:10 pm
by YurikoJasmine
Let's not hammer until the two of us get to say something (or get replaced)
That said,

Zero please speak for yourself. Who do you think is scum and why do you think there's so many votes on your head?

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 1:12 pm
by ZeroSummer
Draynth wrote:ZeroSummer it's pretty clear you're opposed to RV's, why is that?

I don't like random votes at the start of the game because I personally feel it defeats the purpose when people know it's random. I'd prefer to vote for *some* reason even if it's a flimsy D1 reason. Jokey votes are okay, but when everyone does it, it is meaningless.
BlueBloodedToffee wrote:OK, can you vote Zero and ask why he is trying to halt progress of the game?
Funny because me not voting has generated more talking than random voting has.
Let's get a wagon forming and get this game rolling.

YurikoJasmine wrote:
@zerosummer
, what's your view on bbt pushing people to vote you?

It's super weird to me that someone would push for a turbo day one vote for such a silly reason. Is not RVing really such a crime against the game that anyone who doesn't is immediately scum?

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 1:13 pm
by ZeroSummer
Honest wrote:VOTE: vote: bluebloodedtoffee

Feels like you are distancing yourself from what you know will be a town flip:

VOTE: Honest

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 1:15 pm
by ZeroSummer
my reply to this post somehow got put in the quote:

BlueBloodedToffee wrote:OK, can you vote Zero and ask why he is trying to halt progress of the game?

Let's get a wagon forming and get this game rolling.

Funny because me not voting has generated more talking than random voting has

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 1:23 pm
by Dierfire
UNVOTE: Mason
VOTE: Honest

I didn't like the naked vote in .

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:36 pm
by YurikoJasmine
@direfire:
your vote and activity has pretty much been naked too how is it different?

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:55 pm
by Dierfire
YurikoJasmine wrote:
@direfire:
your vote and activity has pretty much been naked too how is it different?


Two things:

1. I like it when players provide reasons for their votes, even if that reason is nonsensical RVS. With Honest's vote, I can't tell whether that vote was RVS or not.

2. This question is a little strange to me, because I can't easily see the reason for asking it. The purpose isn't, I assume, to ask why I voted for Honest rather than for myself. Is the reason to ask me to defend my actions so far? I thought that my stated reasons were good enough for this point in the game, but we can get into more specific things if necessary.

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:43 am
by Axwell
VOTE: BlueBloodedToffee for supporting such a terrible team

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:55 am
by Draynth
ZeroSummer wrote:my reply to this post somehow got put in the quote:

BlueBloodedToffee wrote:OK, can you vote Zero and ask why he is trying to halt progress of the game?

Let's get a wagon forming and get this game rolling.

Funny because me not voting has generated more talking than random voting has

Meh I wouldn't say you not talking has progressed the game, BBT's wagon push on you has IMO

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:56 am
by Draynth
^You not
Voting[/v]....
My bad

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:56 am
by Draynth
Oh my god I'm so derpy, Ill just redo that sentence.

'Meh I wouldn't say you not voting has progressed the game, BBT's wagon push on you has IMO'

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 2:00 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
Yeah, I'm happy with Zero's response.

I also think Honest is a good vote; 31 feels town to me.

VOTE: Honest

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 2:01 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
That's L-2.

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 2:03 am
by Draynth
I want to wait and see whether Honest's vote was an RV, it could be since it was his first post

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 2:06 am
by BlueBloodedToffee
What do you think of Zero now, Draynth?

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 2:18 am
by Draynth
Right now I'm not entirely sure
Unvote

I don't think we'll get any more reactions from that wagon.
I'm unsure because could be 1 of 2 things in my opinion.
1) Town!Zero is genuinely scumhunting after being put to L-1
2) Scum!Zero is deflecting attention to another player to get away from L-1
Right now it's too early to tell I guess

unvote tag problem fixed for the automatic vote counter - f

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 3:56 am
by Draynth
I wish more people would post on what has happened so far :/

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 3:58 am
by Draynth
Dierfire wrote:
YurikoJasmine wrote:
@direfire:
your vote and activity has pretty much been naked too how is it different?


Two things:

1. I like it when players provide reasons for their votes, even if that reason is nonsensical RVS. With Honest's vote, I can't tell whether that vote was RVS or not.

You like it or you think it's a town sign?
Dierfire wrote:
2. This question is a little strange to me, because I can't easily see the reason for asking it. The purpose isn't, I assume, to ask why I voted for Honest rather than for myself.

I think it's simply being implied that your vote is hypocritical (I'm guessing)

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:19 am
by fferyllt
Searching for a replacement for Markin

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:38 am
by YurikoJasmine
30 is good but 32 not

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:58 am
by Dierfire
@Draynth

Draynth wrote:
Dierfire wrote:

Two things:

1. I like it when players provide reasons for their votes, even if that reason is nonsensical RVS. With Honest's vote, I can't tell whether that vote was RVS or not.

You like it or you think it's a town sign?


I guess that I consider it helpful to Town, but it's not strongly indicative of alignment.