Mafiascum.net

↑ Concrete Angels wrote:

↑ Thor665 wrote:

Vote: Davsto

Also, slight town read and slight silly read on Cataphant.

slight town read on cataphant?

Yes, I have a slight town read on him.

Why, do you have a scumread on him and are annoyed that someone is getting the opposite read?
I don't get your issue, and you're not really asking a question here, so...?

↑ Thor665 wrote:

↑ Concrete Angels wrote:

↑ Thor665 wrote:

Vote: Davsto

Also, slight town read and slight silly read on Cataphant.

slight town read on cataphant?

Yes, I have a slight town read on him.

Why, do you have a scumread on him and are annoyed that someone is getting the opposite read?
I don't get your issue, and you're not really asking a question here, so...?

Your wording wasn't very clear. I wasn't sure if you missed a word or if you were saying two things about one person.

I was actually more curious about the speed of the read itself. Do you normally post reads like that right away at the beginning of a game?

Furthermore... I sense a strange aggression in this post. Why?

I have a wild guess as to why, but i'll let him answer, I do have a slight townlean on Thor however i'll sheep


~Sakura

Curious as to the number of votes on me being 4.

↑ Concrete Angels wrote:Your wording wasn't very clear. I wasn't sure if you missed a word or if you were saying two things about one person.

I was saying two things about one person - I also am unsure how saying "I have a slight town read on - X" is unclear. I'll be doing a lot of reads in that basic format in the future; as a warning.

↑ Concrete Angels wrote:I was actually more curious about the speed of the read itself. Do you normally post reads like that right away at the beginning of a game?

Sure, it's pretty normal for me.

↑ Concrete Angels wrote:Furthermore... I sense a strange aggression in this post. Why?

Because I was attacking you for questioning a townread - I find that to be potentially scummy and was trying to get a read off of you as regards that immediate reaction.

Why - do you have an issue with aggression? Does it upset you or make you feel uneasy?

↑ Davsto wrote:Curious as to the number of votes on me being 4.

I would be more curious if the number of votes on you was 3 or 5 - 4 people and 4 votes seems pretty normal.
Why is it curious? I'm curious

↑ Antihero wrote:

everyone plz take a moment to familiarize yourselves with , Post 1, and Post 2. they have some important stuff.

Sure - if you tell me who was missing any of that stuff

↑ Thor665 wrote:

↑ Davsto wrote:Curious as to the number of votes on me being 4.

I would be more curious if the number of votes on you was 3 or 5 - 4 people and 4 votes seems pretty normal.
Why is it curious? I'm curious

I'd expect a more varied spread of votes in RVS.

Especially interesting is that two of said votes are re-votes, and one of them is sheeping. Is sheeping an RVS vote a thing?

@Thor: I found the aggression odd considering my post was pretty obviously a clarification and not a questioning of the read itself. It seemed over the top. I wanted to know if there was a personal reason for it or something else.

My confusion came from the fact the components were separated and I wanted to be sure about what you were saying.

↑ Davsto wrote:I'd expect a more varied spread of votes in RVS.

Really? I'd expect the opposite, RVS wagons are great.

~Sakura

↑ Davsto wrote:I'd expect a more varied spread of votes in RVS.

I would too, but only if we're bad players.

↑ Davsto wrote:Especially interesting is that two of said votes are re-votes, and one of them is sheeping. Is sheeping an RVS vote a thing?

It must be a thing because it just happened.

So you find the re-votes and the sheep vote on you potentially scummy, and me the towniest vote on you?

↑ Concrete Angels wrote:@Thor: I found the aggression odd considering my post was pretty obviously a clarification and not a questioning of the read itself.

I disagree with your value call on what your comment looked like.
And what is "odd" in having aggression? Lots of Mafia players have high levels of real or faked aggression - I would thinkt hat would be very normal to see and, indeed, expected - no?

↑ Concrete Angels wrote:It seemed over the top. I wanted to know if there was a personal reason for it or something else.

Nope, thread related.
It's a hydra of Bella and hiplop that didn't even claim which head had posted (though my guess would be hiplop) - I am not claiming deep meta insight into either of them and it would be weird of me to be able to extract a meta tell from that.
For the record I will never claim deep meta insight into anyone.

Meh. Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

But you still find Cataphant scummier than her?

Don't feel entirely like removing my RVS vote yet. Don't find Cata scummy, but there's only one post.

*shrug*

↑ Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura

↑ Sakura Hana wrote:

↑ Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura

Derp

↑ Sakura Hana wrote:

↑ Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura

I'd rather be honest and admit I don't really get RVS than act all cocky with a slight read knowing it's probably wrong.

↑ Davsto wrote:

↑ Sakura Hana wrote:

↑ Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura

I'd rather be honest and admit I don't really get RVS than act all cocky with a slight read knowing it's probably wrong.

If you think it's probably wrong, why not pursue it further and find out instead of sitting there? I don't get it

~Sakura

↑ Sakura Hana wrote:

↑ Davsto wrote:

↑ Sakura Hana wrote:

↑ Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura

I'd rather be honest and admit I don't really get RVS than act all cocky with a slight read knowing it's probably wrong.

If you think it's probably wrong, why not pursue it further and find out instead of sitting there? I don't get it

~Sakura

I probably should unbookmark this from my main

Sorry anti haven't played in hydra in a while

~Sakura

↑ Sakura Hana wrote:

↑ Davsto wrote:

↑ Sakura Hana wrote:

↑ Davsto wrote:Maybe Sakura's I don't like that much, but I've never been one to read RVS well.

What's with this wishy-washy stance?

~Sakura

I'd rather be honest and admit I don't really get RVS than act all cocky with a slight read knowing it's probably wrong.

If you think it's probably wrong, why not pursue it further and find out instead of sitting there? I don't get it

~Sakura

Because then everyone seems to think I have a solid read of some sort, idk.

So why did you sheep Thor whilst changing your vote?

Eh, I'm fine with this speed wagon as currently exists.

↑ Davsto wrote:So why did you sheep Thor whilst changing your vote?

Already mentioned:

↑ Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:I do have a slight townlean on Thor

↑ Hecatia Lapislazuli wrote:RVS wagons are great.

~Sakura