Page 2 of 107

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:26 am
by Transcend
We cannot ascertain whether the vote that Blitz made was her being scum strengthening the BW to achieve a ML or town applying pressure to get the game going.

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:28 am
by MichelSableheart
In post 18, Nero Cain wrote:Its RVS. No one besides me (since I'm leet!) is really going to have a reason to vote anyone and its odd that you expect anyone to have a reason even if its a joke reason. I mean obviously Trancend's "reason" is lulz and not even you believe it so I'm not sure why you think Blitz or anyone should discuss that other than it being slightly conscious.

Just 'cause Blitz was the first "naked voter" I don't really see why we/you should focus on it.
You feel I should have focused on someone/something else, then?

@Transcend: why is your #6 a better reason to vote, given that you were lying about your rolepm?

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:29 am
by Transcend
It wasn't strategic like your vote. I wasn't reaction testing Maria she just knows I always troll her at the beginning of this game.

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:30 am
by Transcend
And your vote hop on Blitzkrieg looked extremely opportunistic.

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:37 am
by Thor665
It's RVS - everything is NAI right now as far as anyone can tell.
So calling anything stupid doesn't make any more sense than wagoning someone over something of debatable alignment value.
I don't get your issue.

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:39 am
by Thor665
In post 28, Transcend wrote:And your vote hop on Blitzkrieg looked extremely opportunistic.
How exactly was it opportunistic?
I voted the biggest wagon. By definition a wagon will exist that will be biggest with my vote, or is already biggest and I can vote for it upon arrival.
It's impossible not to have that ability.

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:42 am
by Transcend
your naked vote and iai's naked vote mean nothing to me.

mich's reasoning for voting sounds like bullshat scumtalk.

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:44 am
by I Am Innocent
In post 25, Transcend wrote:We cannot ascertain whether the vote that Blitz made was her being scum strengthening the BW to achieve a ML or town applying pressure to get the game going.
So if applying pressure to get the game going is townie, why is a wagon on blitz a bad thing?

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:47 am
by I Am Innocent
In post 31, Transcend wrote:your naked vote and iai's naked vote mean nothing to me.

mich's reasoning for voting sounds like bullshat scumtalk.
Ah so ur just so sure Michael is scum so blitz must be town?

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:49 am
by Transcend
IT'S THE REASONS HE VOTED BLITZ. THEY DON'T LOOK GENUINE. IT CAN BE A BUS, IT CAN BE HIM VOTING TOWN. BLITZ'S ALIGNMENT ISN'T CONFIRMED FROM THIS.

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:57 am
by I Am Innocent
Why you yelling already it's only page 2. Nearly Half the game hasn't posted yet and blitz hasn't had a response to her L-3 wagon. Relax...

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:57 am
by chilledtea
OFFICIAL VOTE COUNT 1.01



MichelSableheart (L-6) : Transcend.

MariaR (L-6) : Blitzkrieg.

Transcend (L-6) : Nero Cain.

kraska77 (L-6) : Shadow_step.

Blitzkrieg (L-4) : I Am Innocent, MichelSableheart, Thor665.

Not Voting (6) : Elyse, gerryoat, karnos, JarJarDrinks, kraska77, MariaR.

Day will end in (expired on 2016-09-13 10:30:00)

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 1:57 am
by I Am Innocent
L-4 I mean

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 2:01 am
by MichelSableheart
@Transcend: what you're probably seeing is that I tried to find something in the thread that might be indicative of mafia. As it was still Arbitrary Voting Stage, there wasn't much to go on, so of course my reasoning is going to look forced.

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 2:03 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 17, Transcend wrote:i lied about my role pm
Too late for that.
VOTE: MariaR

If Maria flips town, we flashlynch Transcend.

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 4:16 am
by Elyse
VOTE: MichelSableheart

Deciding between "of course my reasoning is forced" and Transcend's page 2 faux-rage was a toughie let me tell you

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 4:26 am
by I Am Innocent
Elyse, u scum?

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 4:51 am
by Elyse
No :(

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 5:15 am
by Thor665
In post 32, I Am Innocent wrote:
In post 25, Transcend wrote:We cannot ascertain whether the vote that Blitz made was her being scum strengthening the BW to achieve a ML or town applying pressure to get the game going.
So if applying pressure to get the game going is townie, why is a wagon on blitz a bad thing?
Welcome to the transcendental lack hole of logic.
In post 40, Elyse wrote:VOTE: MichelSableheart

Deciding between "of course my reasoning is forced" and Transcend's page 2 faux-rage was a toughie let me tell you
:lol:
How is admitting that the reasoning is forced a scumtell?
I'm openly admitting to voting the biggest wagon because it's the biggest - that's an admission of lack of scum read and bandwagoning for the sake of a wagon. That's just as scummy.
What are you smoking here?

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 6:13 am
by Blitzkrieg
In post 39, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 17, Transcend wrote:i lied about my role pm
Too late for that.
VOTE: MariaR

If Maria flips town, we flashlynch Transcend.
You scum or selectively replying? How can you be following me yet oblivious yo the wagon on me?

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 6:17 am
by Nero Cain
I
KINDA
thought that was a joke or maybe a classic push townie bus buddy.

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 6:24 am
by Nero Cain
In post 26, MichelSableheart wrote:You feel I should have focused on someone/something else, then?
Yes and no. Personally I believe Transend is a bit scummy. I just mostly think your "LOOK BLITZ'S VOTE WAS NAKED SO LET ME IGNORE THE OTHER NAKED VOTES AND VOTE THIS!" was junk.

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 6:26 am
by Nero Cain
Thor what do you think of Sable atm?

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 6:35 am
by Nero Cain
There a reason you lurking Maria?

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 6:56 am
by Elyse
In post 43, Thor665 wrote:How is admitting that the reasoning is forced a scumtell?
I'm openly admitting to voting the biggest wagon because it's the biggest - that's an admission of lack of scum read and bandwagoning for the sake of a wagon. That's just as scummy.
What are you smoking here?
Michel seemed to be talking a big game and the sharp turn where he criticized his own wagon seemed off to me. It's not that he did it - it's that he did it after acting all confident.