Page 2 of 47

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:51 am
by Dunnstral
I oppose mass flavor claim

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:16 am
by Foxbird
Votecount 1.1


Dunnstral
(2) - Shadow_step, The Oxford Bubbles
Seiko x Naomi
(1) - borkjerfkin
Aj The Epic
(1) - Syryana

Not Voting
(5) - Dunnstral, Seiko x Naomi, Obvious Alt, Aj The Epic, Charloux

With
9
players eligible to vote, it’s
5
to lynch!

Day 1 will end in
(expired on 2017-01-26 06:01:00).

Mod Notes:

None!

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:18 am
by Seiko x Naomi
In post 8, borkjerfkin wrote:VOTE: Seiko x Naomi

You alive ns?
In post 16, Syryana wrote:NOTTY!

*glomp*
Image
In post 17, Obvious Alt wrote:I would like to discuss the pros/cons of mass flavor claiming.
I enjoy mass flavorclaims.

But I enjoy massclaims in general.

Pros- There might be some role interactions with regards to flavor, it limits claims down the line,
it quells my curiosity as to who you all picked
, and maybe if all the stars align and we pay a blood sacrifice we could catch scum? (I doubt a upick will have its flavors be alignment indicative without solid fakeclaims in place.)

Cons- There's probably some roles that, thanks to flavor, are inherently overpowered and claiming characters will give scum (provided they have an inkling of knowledge of the source material this game was based off of) a road map on who to kill. (Of course, this could be balanced out by town power, and of course is purely conjecture)

I think it's a good way people to do things without actually doing things though.
In post 23, borkjerfkin wrote:Ultimately I think it's going to be much ado about nothing at best and a distraction at worst
^

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:19 am
by Seiko x Naomi
Also on the list of distractions is playing guess the alt.

It's kinda sad that these are things I know I love to do in games.

<_< >_>

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:21 am
by Dunnstral
In post 7, Shadow_step wrote:VOTE: Dunn

Always lost games in which I've played with him, he is to be blamed.
funny, I always seem to win

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:22 am
by Seiko x Naomi
In post 18, Charloux wrote:But what prevents us from fakeclaiming?
In post 18, Charloux wrote:But what prevents
us
from fakeclaiming?
In post 18, Charloux wrote:But what prevents
us
from fakeclaiming?
Hey buddy

What's up with this?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:33 am
by Charloux
Uhm i asked what prevents players from claiming to be a hero they are not?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:43 am
by Syryana
Nice catch, notty.

*hugs*

VOTE: Charloux

CHOO CHOO MOTHAFUCKAZ

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:44 am
by borkjerfkin
Are you actually serious

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:49 am
by Dunnstral
I don't think I've ever seen "us" be used as "Us, the mafia" before

Beyond that, It's pretty scummy to make a big deal out of it. I know from experience this kind of accusation tends to be bought by that one guy who then tunnels on it for the whole game so this goes well beyond rvs

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:07 am
by Charloux
In post 34, Dunnstral wrote: Beyond that, It's pretty scummy to make a big deal out of it.
Is this about Seiko or Syryana?
I think Seiko was just trying to create discussion. Syryana jumping the gun is alarming for me, but if someone has meta on him about his <page 5 voting tendencies that would be appreciated.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:09 am
by Dunnstral
I think seiko is scummy there too. That's not rvs, that's early shade on something that wasn't scummy. A false slip

Syryana's hop on doesn't inspire confidence, either

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:12 am
by The Oxford Bubbles
Well, "us" is better to go on right now than "he lewd".

VOTE: Charloux

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:14 am
by borkjerfkin
What exactly about "us" lends to the inference of "us, the scumteam i am on" vs "us, the playerlist"

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:19 am
by Syryana
Bork.

Shoo.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:20 am
by borkjerfkin
Kay.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:37 am
by Dunnstral
In post 38, borkjerfkin wrote:What exactly about "us" lends to the inference of "us, the scumteam i am on" vs "us, the playerlist"
In fact there's evidence to the latter. He says us three times in that post and the context is clear

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:44 am
by The Oxford Bubbles
We're a three-person secret hydra, for what it's worth.

Our heads are:
Bemmit
Bubbles
Raven

All unsigned posts so far have been Bemmit.

~ Raven

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:44 am
by The Oxford Bubbles
Good point. UNVOTE: Charloux

- Bemmit

>tfw another person on your hydra posts before you

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:47 am
by Dunnstral
In post 42, The Oxford Bubbles wrote:We're a three-person secret hydra, for what it's worth.

Our heads are:
Bemmit
Bubbles
Raven

All unsigned posts so far have been Bemmit.

~ Raven

Wut

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:35 pm
by The Oxford Bubbles
Dunnstral, I don't think it was a slip, but what harm does having an early wagon do?

~ Raven

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:37 pm
by Dunnstral
Feel free to start an early wagon that isn't based off a disgusting misrep. You should be wagoning one of sekio and Syryana. Why aren't you? What harm does having an early wagon do? Why does it have to be on Charloux, in your opinion?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:59 pm
by Charloux
Meh my current meta is getting a PR and being forced to claim D1 because i've been scummy. Kinda like a curse.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:01 pm
by The Oxford Bubbles
Charloux already has votes. Stopping the wagon drains momentum from the game. You aren't using your vote - choose someone else and I'll join you.

~ Raven

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:06 pm
by borkjerfkin
I have a couple (light) townreads, need to wait till us-gate comes to a head before i share them.