Mini 544/Mars 4 - Keyboard Mafia - Mod Abandoned
Forum rules
- SeraphicMirth
- SeraphicMirth
-
SeraphicMirth
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 402
- Joined: June 13, 2007
- Location: Washington, USA; Oregonian at heart
- kabenon007
- kabenon007
-
kabenon007
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Cannot be disclosed, as it would jeapordize my mission
Yes, because the obvious way of looking at it is that I'm mafia. I should be lynched right away. Unless, of course, I'm not mafia. I could have an investigation power. Or, y'know, I could just have a hunch. Hunches are allowed, right? And they're not random.ryan wrote:And that's a good reason to vote somebody? That's the same thing as random voting Peers. There's no reason to say that junk is anymore town than I am, unless of course you know who's town and who's not because you are indeed mafia.
I honestly don't see how we can start conversation with a no kill other than we know there is probably a Mafia group (OMG! wat a surprise!) and a a doctor.
I think we should also concentrate on what the roles are. Seeing how they are all based off a key board, we could possibly have letters, numbers, punctuation marks, and functions like Enter and Delete. "~" and "F12" have already been killed, so we can cross them off.
Any other comments on this?
I think we should also concentrate on what the roles are. Seeing how they are all based off a key board, we could possibly have letters, numbers, punctuation marks, and functions like Enter and Delete. "~" and "F12" have already been killed, so we can cross them off.
Any other comments on this?
Yet in post 38 you state your reason for voting me wasPeers wrote:Yes, because the obvious way of looking at it is that I'm mafia. I should be lynched right away. Unless, of course, I'm not mafia. I could have an investigation power. Or, y'know, I could just have a hunch. Hunches are allowed, right? And they're not random.ryan wrote:And that's a good reason to vote somebody? That's the same thing as random voting Peers. There's no reason to say that junk is anymore town than I am, unless of course you know who's town and who's not because you are indeed mafia.
That says NOTHING about a hunch. You’re basically trying to eliminate me so the game won’t be confused? Or are you trying to coverup for your scum buddy?Peers wrote: An attempt to prevent confusion by eliminating a player with a very similar name to a more veteran player. I've already said that.
Also for you to vote me AND bring up that you could have an investigative power is completely uncalled for. If you were a cop, you just basically outed yourself and if you aren't the cop, you're basically saying you investigated me and found scum (which you didn't since I'm not) Why are you trying to sway the game to follow you so early Peers?
[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]
Wow... and I thought I tended to overreact.ryan wrote:Also for you to vote me AND bring up that you could have an investigative power is completely uncalled for. If you were a cop, you just basically outed yourself and if you aren't the cop, you're basically saying you investigated me and found scum (which you didn't since I'm not) Why are you trying to sway the game to follow you so early Peers?
So, when someone says "The only way you could have info on who is and isn't scum is if you're mafia", it's completely uncalled for for me to point out that you're wrong, there's other ways for me to have info... or I might not have info at all? Wow. How do I defend myself against a charge that I didn't need to defend myself?
And, tell me, ryan... where did I try to sway the game to follow me? I made a vote and gave a reason for it. You attacked me. I defended myself. No 'swaying' involved. I didn't even try to get other people to vote for you. I notice you didn't attack the other person voting for you. Just me. Why is that? You're not scumbuddies trying to lure someone into a trap, are you?
MOD: Fixed tags.
I attacked you because you argued why ryanjunk or I should be lynched and than with an OMGUS reasoning you said "works for me" and piled on EVEN though you said random voting shouldn't happen since we already had a night session (which BTW we learned nothing)
[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]
So you vote for a guy for the reason of trying to steal your name, even though he had it first. So when I vote for you for pretty much the same reason you're voting him (having close to the same name), I'm scummy? I can only say "Yeah, that name thing is gonna get annoying" if I'm one of the people with the name?
And who says we didn't learn anything last night? We've learned that either the anti-town faction(s) couldn't kill last night, or we've got an amazingly lucky doctor(s) or un-NK-ables on our side.
And who says we didn't learn anything last night? We've learned that either the anti-town faction(s) couldn't kill last night, or we've got an amazingly lucky doctor(s) or un-NK-ables on our side.
I didn't agree with the OMGUS vote. I agreed with his pointing out he had the name first, and you were voting him for 'stealing' what was his first. Even if he hadn't voted for you, I'd've still cast my vote that way. After all, "Claims something is theirs even when it isn't" isn't exactly honest.ryan wrote:I'm saying you are scummy for playing devil's advocate (or trying) and than immediately agreeing with an OMGUS vote. You're acting like your pro town but your actions so far do not point that way to me.