Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:23 am
Rampage's entrance has that trying-too-hard-scum-vibe.In post 18, Garuga wrote:Sho: Why do you think Rampage is scummier? The only suspicious thing I've noticed up until now is TBB's OMGUS vote.
Page 2 of 54
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:27 am
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:29 am
Why is 18 bad?
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:32 am
dumb vote and that question was really bad
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:36 am
I disagree. What's "dumb" about the vote? And why is the question "really bad"?In post 28, Invisibility wrote:dumb vote and that question was really bad
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:44 am
My issue with 18 is he said he found the omgus suspicious but didn’t vote it.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 6:45 am
Good
Not goodIn post 13, Invisibility wrote:Naked RVS makes me sad
Good - Maybe the thought of that early wagon had something to do with it?In post 25, Shoshin wrote:Rampage's entrance has that trying-too-hard-scum-vibe.In post 18, Garuga wrote:Sho: Why do you think Rampage is scummier? The only suspicious thing I've noticed up until now is TBB's OMGUS vote.
GoodIn post 30, Gustavo wrote:My issue with 18 is he said he found the omgus suspicious but didn’t vote it.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 6:46 am
VOTE: invisibility
Let’s get to work
Let’s get to work
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 8:34 am
Why's that scummy?In post 30, Gustavo wrote:My issue with 18 is he said he found the omgus suspicious but didn’t vote it.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 8:45 am
Cause you don’t rvs vote over something suspicious
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 8:57 am
Why would scum do this?In post 34, Gustavo wrote:Cause you don’t rvs vote over something suspicious
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 10:25 am
Idk. But more importantly I don’t know why town would which is why it’s suspiciousIn post 35, Shoshin wrote:Why would scum do this?In post 34, Gustavo wrote:Cause you don’t rvs vote over something suspicious
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 3:46 pm
Shoshin why is Garuga town?
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 3:53 pm
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:39 pm
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:41 pm
Meaning u were planning to vote for me or ur mad that he made the games first vote?
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:47 pm
@Shoshin
why are you defending a post from Garuga that he himself admitted was bad?
why are you defending a post from Garuga that he himself admitted was bad?
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:49 pm
I don't think Jar Jar Binks was a good character.In post 39, JarJarDrinks wrote:Is it cuz u dont like Jar Jar. Or u dont like people making fun of Jar Jar's name?
Answer may affect where I vote.
Also, why would my answer affect who you vote for? There's a fair amount of non-RVS discussion going on right now. Most of it is about 18, one of my posts.
Edit after preview: oh ok
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:56 pm
what do u think of Shoshin hard defending u?
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 5:57 pm
It was because I was gonna vote for you and make some off handed comment about how Jar Jar sucks and turned the Galactic Republic into and Empire by getting Chancellor Palpatine Emergency Powers.In post 40, JarJarDrinks wrote:Meaning u were planning to vote for me or ur mad that he made the games first vote?
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 6:02 pm
Padme made him supreme chancellor in the first place. And anakin was as annoying of a character.
What do u think of Shoshins Garuga read (and her vote on you) ?
What do u think of Shoshins Garuga read (and her vote on you) ?
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 6:07 pm
That's precisely why.In post 41, JarJarDrinks wrote:why are you defending a post from Garuga that he himself admitted was bad?
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 6:11 pm
Garuga's town because he called his own posts bad, which demonstrates a lack of concern about appearances, and because the OMGUS point shows that he's looking for the underlying meaning to every post, including naked votes during RVS.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 6:12 pm
It could be buddying. I don't think TheRampage's opening post was scummy.In post 43, JarJarDrinks wrote:what do u think of Shoshin hard defending u?
RIP my vanity wagon, at least it got some reactions.
VOTE: Invisibility
He didn't provide clear arguments for his reads on me.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 6:18 pm
So ur saying 18 itself could be considered scummy but the post he made defending it 3 posts later is what makes it good?In post 46, Shoshin wrote:That's precisely why.In post 41, JarJarDrinks wrote:why are you defending a post from Garuga that he himself admitted was bad?
That doesnt seem like what ur arguing at all in these posts:
Spoiler:
VOTE: Shoshin