Mafiascum.net

uhh, dunno if the grammar is correct, but w/e

I'm prob gonna be making a lot of grammar mistakes btw. I'm not really good at it

In post 23, Keyser Söze wrote:Godammit! Still haven't rolled scum with

the worst

(there were even improved odds too: 3 from 9!)

btw, were you planning to say this since before the game started?

I recall someone saying that they want their alignments to be the same as in the watchers game, were you scum there?

and why do you want to roll scum with them

Currently reading Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde's and LabRat01's posts to/in relation with eachother... I will give a supported estimation whether they are scum partners in the next half hour.

@Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde - is there a way of abbreviating your name brother? It's quite a mouthful.

In post 26, LabRat01 wrote:

In post 23, Keyser Söze wrote:Godammit! Still haven't rolled scum with

the worst

(there were even improved odds too: 3 from 9!)

btw, were you planning to say this since before the game started?

I recall someone saying that they want their alignments to be the same as in the watchers game, were you scum there?

For some reason I thought it was a 7:2 setup... learnt from the OP that there are in fact three mafia! "majority of scum" makes sense now though: we only need to send two mafia to hell to win (?).
the worst is a great character to play with as town or scum - .
In the Watchmen game we were both town.

In post 28, Keyser Söze wrote:Currently reading Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde's and LabRat01's posts to/in relation with eachother... I will give a supported estimation whether they are scum partners in the next half hour.

@Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde - is there a way of abbreviating your name brother? It's quite a mouthful.

do it

btw, DrJ is a hydra of korina and LCpl Jones (or sth like that) so unless the "brother" you're talking about is fat enough to count as 2, you should prob be using plurals

In post 29, Keyser Söze wrote:

In post 26, LabRat01 wrote:

In post 23, Keyser Söze wrote:Godammit! Still haven't rolled scum with

the worst

(there were even improved odds too: 3 from 9!)

btw, were you planning to say this since before the game started?

I recall someone saying that they want their alignments to be the same as in the watchers game, were you scum there?

For some reason I thought it was a 7:2 setup... learnt from the OP that there are in fact three mafia! :o "majority of scum" makes sense now though: we only need to send two mafia to hell to win (?).
the worst is a great character to play with as town or scum -

I think we would have just as much fun together as town or scum

.
In the Watchmen game we were both town.

yep

do you think you'll be able to read him?

Jesus this site formatting makes phone posting hard

@Soze I’m not sure how serious I should be reading you rn

But based on 28 & 29 in succession I’m assuming somewhat serious?

In post 32, Lefty wrote:Jesus this site formatting makes phone posting hard

@Soze I’m not sure how serious I should be reading you rn

(no, but seriusly, the game won't progress on its own so just do sth)

btw, does that mean IF you were serious, you'd have a read on him? mind elaborating?

oof, just noticed I understood the post wong

In post 31, LabRat01 wrote:do you think you'll be able to read him?

Played two consecutive completed games with him recently, so I hope that helps me.

In post 30, LabRat01 wrote:btw, DrJ is a hydra of korina and LCpl Jones (or sth like that) so unless the "brother" you're talking about is fat enough to count as 2, you should prob be using plurals

DrJ is a good short name - noted.

In post 30, LabRat01 wrote:do it

WIFOM says you're not scum partners:
If not, , it would seem you've made too much of a conscious effort to try to distance eachother (through anti-distance...?)

Playful RVS vote eachother...
You going all about how you dug up their first scum game and read ten whole pages of it as part of meta research...
Creating an awkward dis-connection between you two, which I conclude is: 2xVT or 1 goon-1 VT interactions.

In post 33, Lefty wrote:But based on 28 & 29 in succession I’m assuming somewhat serious?

I believe I've been serious in each post so far (all reads/conclusions) based on the limited data so far.

I admittedly amped up my suspicion/scum feels for you to 11 for effect though.

In post 37, Keyser Söze wrote:I admittedly amped up my suspicion/scum feels for you to 11 for effect though.

*up to 11

I understood what you meant lol. I figured as much at the time, but then you followed up with Dr. J/Rat spec so I wasn’t sure. I’m not really interested in arguing the merits of it anyway

How are you reading Dr. J and LabRat independently?

Reads 2 pages in??


Well, Dr J hasn’t impressed anything on me yet.

Labrat has come into the game seemingly relaxed (comfortable, open chatty aura)... the role pm error spot gave him his entrance... since then raising questions... yeah nothing much to allocate as significantly alignment indicative. It’s his tone which maybe goes in his favour.

In post 36, Keyser Söze wrote:

In post 30, LabRat01 wrote:do it

WIFOM says you're not scum partners:
If not,

as partners

, it would seem you've made too much of a conscious effort to try to distance eachother (through anti-distance...?)

Playful RVS vote eachother...
You going all about how you dug up their first scum game and read ten whole pages of it as part of meta research...
Creating an awkward dis-connection between you two, which I conclude is: 2xVT or 1 goon-1 VT interactions.

uh, that was connected to the game, but it was pre game
I prob wouldn't have had enough time to read 10 pages of another game after getting the RC even if I tried it

In post 9, Lefty wrote:whaddup

VOTE: Keyser

GOATs only

CHAINSAWING KEYSER, THE TRUE GOAT
VOTE: lefty

I mean, you already decided they’re not M/M in two pages so why not

In post 19, Lefty wrote:oh so we're pretending derp clears have actual merit or

?

I don’t think anyone should read any of pg 1 as anything but tongue in cheek shitposting

I mean some sites open day 1 by aggressively shitposting which is v v boring

I often carry some reads out of rvs and reality check them later ;>

In post 42, the worst wrote:

In post 9, Lefty wrote:whaddup

VOTE: Keyser

GOATs only

CHAINSAWING KEYSER, THE TRUE GOAT
VOTE: lefty

But the sheep pic tho

I thought it was funny

In post 20, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Hi o/

D1 is hell, right?
VOTE: labrat

He probably only noticed it because he got it in his rolecard
Lcp aka mr hyde

HEY LCP<33

In post 44, the worst wrote:

In post 19, Lefty wrote:oh so we're pretending derp clears have actual merit or

?

I don’t think anyone should read any of pg 1 as anything but tongue in cheek shitposting

I mean some sites open day 1 by aggressively shitposting which is v v boring

I often carry some reads out of rvs and reality check them later ;>

I shoulda said *this* pg 1. At least in regards to the responses in the RC talk

Soul reads are real, man. I get it

In post 23, Keyser Söze wrote:Godammit! Still haven't rolled scum with the worst (there were even improved odds too: 3 from 9!)

ilu keyser

In post 32, Lefty wrote:Jesus this site formatting makes phone posting hard

@Soze I’m not sure how serious I should be reading you rn

try phoneposting on mu lmao

MU doesn’t even work on my phone unless WiFi

Rip