Posted: Tue Aug 06, 2019 5:18 am
OH WAIT YOU KNOW WHAT I WANNA CHANGE MY CHOICES NOW BRB
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
I asked this and GIF said that it doesn't have to be before transformation.In post 27, popsofctown wrote: Does the character need to be female before and after transformation?
The main character from Kämpfer, probably.In post 30, Kagami wrote:Ranma (the only one who I can vaguely imagine as a boy magically transforming into a girl?) is clearly not a magical girl.
I think final transformation has to be a girl.In post 29, popsofctown wrote:So it can be a boy that becomes a girl sometimes?
Even if you prefer J.K. Rowling tweets over the concept of "The Author is Dead", the idea that a character only fits a trope if the author was aware of the trope when he wrote the character and specifically designed in an attempt to fit that trope is logically absurd. By that definition, Shakespeare didn't write a single "tragic hero", because he hadn't created the trope yet.In post 30, Kagami wrote:I mean, the strict definition would be fairly straightforward: Did the creator intend for this to be a "magical girl?"
Ok.In post 33, Bitmap wrote:I think final transformation has to be a girl.In post 29, popsofctown wrote:So it can be a boy that becomes a girl sometimes?
I suggest looking at the OP. The first three are soft yes's in that I'd ask FG if you want permission to bend the rules there.In post 27, popsofctown wrote:I have become totally fascinated about thinking of characters that do/don't fit these rules.
Questions:
Does "girl" imply youth, do the characters need to be children or at least teenagers?
Does the character need to be human before and after transformation?
Does the character need to be female before and after transformation?
Does the transformation need to be voluntary in the canon?
Does the transformation need to be temporary in the canon?
If the transformation is explained by sci-fi elements rather than magic is it disqualified (I feel like superheroes would be lame)?
Can the character be evil?
/confirmIn post 40, Tana and Ephraim wrote:replacing RC and Sakura Hana's ins
I don't know what RAW stands for. The first three seem unclear based on the OP. The second two conflict with the setup design a bit. The evil prohibition was possibly implied by the Nyaruko example. And the scifi one I have no basis for whatsoever, I am tired of Marvel movies and am shamelessly trying to convince GiF to ban them, I guess by Socratic questioning.In post 38, Jingle wrote:I suggest looking at the OP. The first three are soft yes's in that I'd ask FG if you want permission to bend the rules there.In post 27, popsofctown wrote:I have become totally fascinated about thinking of characters that do/don't fit these rules.
Questions:
Does "girl" imply youth, do the characters need to be children or at least teenagers?
Does the character need to be human before and after transformation?
Does the character need to be female before and after transformation?
Does the transformation need to be voluntary in the canon?
Does the transformation need to be temporary in the canon?
If the transformation is explained by sci-fi elements rather than magic is it disqualified (I feel like superheroes would be lame)?
Can the character be evil?
Nothing is said about temporary or voluntary transformations. Nothing is said about technology/science being disqualifying. Nothing is said about villains not being magical girl fodder. All of those are perfectly acceptable RAW, and if GiF wants to change that he should.
Teal Dear: Make your case, and if GiF thinks it'll be fun/interesting he'll probably say yes.
Not the red power ranger.In post 39, Bitmap wrote:Ok it's 2019 so I have to ask this question. What is a "girl" in the eyes of GIF?
ಠ_ಠI kind of want my magical girls to be young just out of preference