Mafiascum.net

In post 12, Emperor flippyNips wrote:VOTE: skellen

This is odd.

Skellen has never posted anything in this board and here you are coming in and voting Skellen without saying anything about him. Why Skellen?

The talk about game experience comes across as mafia-ish to me. Seems like someone is planning his night kill early in the game.

RVS votes don't matter for jack ****. That's what i believe, i'm just trying to follow the culture around these parts since some of the people here actually seem to believe that RVS votes matter. Yet now Profii is claiming my vote puts us out of RVS? Scummy.

Like I know you were playing with Garmr

But you said in post 15 "you will have to be lynched "

That infers a reason for the vote
Might be a silly fun reason but it wasnt random

So RVS is even more pointless than i thought.
Good to know.

That's a debate for another day. It has its place as rubbish as it is

I'll just UNVOTE: for now. Would like to see more of what people has to say before i start placing votes. That's more my style anyway.

In post 25, Kraeg wrote:

In post 12, Emperor flippyNips wrote:VOTE: skellen

This is odd.

Skellen has never posted anything in this board and here you are coming in and voting Skellen without saying anything about him. Why Skellen?

Well
1. I don’t like following other people’s rvs I like my own
2. Most people hadn’t posted by that point so anyone i voted besides two people would fall into this category

And for the most important of them

3. It’s me saying hi to skellen

In post 31, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'll just UNVOTE: for now. Would like to see more of what people has to say before i start placing votes. That's more my style anyway.

Who's the scummiest so far though

@Profii
It's really too early for me to tell. We've got lots of time anyway. I'll promise to come back with you on this. Once we've got a bunch more pages of discussion i'll post my reads.

In post 28, profii wrote:Like I know you were playing with Garmr

But you said in post 15 "you will have to be lynched

for that

"

That infers a reason for the vote
Might be a silly fun reason but it wasnt random

Is it your position that votes during RVS should be completely random? I feel like him giving a reason for the vote was better than switching it with no discussion.

If so:
1)how would we ever move out of RVS short of setting a deadline; and
2) what information would you hope to glean from truly random votes?

Not a fan of Norweigenboy's defensive tone, and definitely not a fan that he unvoted when getting pressure for voting.

Forgot to add
@mod I will be V/LA until Monday night my time. I will try and drop in at least once a day, but my posting will pick up starting Monday night.

My unvote really didn't have anything to do with pressure mr Billy Pilgrim. I've never been a fan of RVS votes. I just thought i'd stay hip with the crowds at mafiascum by doing it. Also can you try to spell my name right? God, at least this proves we aren't teamed up. Otherwise i would have complained about that to you already.

In post 35, Billy Pilgrim wrote:

In post 28, profii wrote:Like I know you were playing with Garmr

But you said in post 15 "you will have to be lynched

for that

"

That infers a reason for the vote
Might be a silly fun reason but it wasnt random

Is it your position that votes during RVS should be completely random? I feel like him giving a reason for the vote was better than switching it with no discussion.

If so:
1)how would we ever move out of RVS short of setting a deadline; and
2) what information would you hope to glean from truly random votes?

Not a fan of Norweigenboy's defensive tone, and definitely not a fan that he unvoted when getting pressure for voting.

Maybe for like the first 3 votes where literally nothing has happened


someone once called it the 'low information voting stage' which i liked and thats the reason i just probed at Norge's vote just to see if he reacted in any major way but i dont think he did

In post 25, Kraeg wrote:

In post 12, Emperor flippyNips wrote:VOTE: skellen

This is odd.

I don't see what's so odd about it? I mean flippy gave you already kind of the obvious answer (mainly his 2.). The only thing he could have commented on was the beginning of the Garmr/Norwegianboy interaction. I understand you are scumreading the latter also for his opening, so if voting elsewhere is odd wouldn't it be more interesting to get to know why flippy decided to not comment/vote there?

Also I am a she.

In post 27, NorwegianboyEE wrote:RVS votes don't matter for jack ****. That's what i believe, i'm just trying to follow the culture around these parts since some of the people here actually seem to believe that RVS votes matter. Yet now Profii is claiming my vote puts us out of RVS? Scummy.

I get your stance on this, I struggle with some things on this site too that just seem to be the general consensus here. Unfortunately you have to roll with it.

Tbh I am not really getting your point about profii why thinking your vote moved us out of RVS is scummy. I get your tonal read in #21, but if you dislike RVS so much, why have you decided to roll with it instead of going for profii who gave you actually scummy vibes?

In post 35, Billy Pilgrim wrote: Not a fan of Norweigenboy's defensive tone, and definitely not a fan that he unvoted when getting pressure for voting.

Not a fan of this. I dislike how you are obviously not feeling good about Norwegianboy yet you are hesitant to increase the pressure on him with not voting him?

VOTE: Billy

In post 40, Skellen wrote: Tbh I am not really getting your point about profii why thinking your vote moved us out of RVS is scummy. I get your tonal read in #21, but if you dislike RVS so much, why have you decided to roll with it instead of going for profii who gave you actually scummy vibes?

I thought that Profii might be attempting to provoke me so he can get a good read on my alignment. Which is a townie thing to do, so that's why i didn't blame him. Of course there's also the possibility he's mafia attempting to get a early outing of a townie. But i think he's trustworthy since he even confirmed his intent in this post:

In post 38, profii wrote:thats the reason i just probed at Norge's vote just to see if he reacted in any major way but i dont think he did

In post 42, NorwegianboyEE wrote:there's also the possibility he's mafia attempting to get a early outing of a townie

What does that bit mean? Why would mafia out a towns person? They know who town are and revealing townsfolk to the rest of the townsfolk would put them at a disadvantage.

I'm guessing I've misunderstood what you mean there

I mean get an early mislynch*

In post 41, Skellen wrote:

In post 35, Billy Pilgrim wrote: Not a fan of Norweigenboy's defensive tone, and definitely not a fan that he unvoted when getting pressure for voting.

Not a fan of this. I dislike how you are obviously not feeling good about Norwegianboy yet you are hesitant to increase the pressure on him with not voting him?

VOTE: Billy

Fair enough. I wait a bit before casting a vote. I get why you read this as off, but it's where I'm at now with how I want to play D1.

In post 41, Skellen wrote:

In post 35, Billy Pilgrim wrote: Not a fan of Norweigenboy's defensive tone, and definitely not a fan that he unvoted when getting pressure for voting.

Not a fan of this. I dislike how you are obviously not feeling good about Norwegianboy yet you are hesitant to increase the pressure on him with not voting him?

VOTE: Billy

Also, the defensive tone is a weak tell. The unvote's a bit stronger, but his sorting of profii felt genuine. There was that weird shading in the middle of 42, but he came around with decent reason at the end with reading the intention.

I really don't like Kraeg's opening, feels too sudden/serious for an early stage in the game.

VOTE: Kraeg for now.

I agree fellow animated avatar. He gave me the same icky feeling.