Mafiascum.net

I've totally forgoten all the codes to do bold and stuff...


I said in my 1st post 6, so voted for whoever posted the 6th message after that

I have to say, it is really helpful they have put everyone's role under their name, it is going to really make this easy...but there seems to be an error with mine

or
VOTE: uncrowned

are both valid - the trick is the colon

In post 27, the worst wrote:

vote: uncrowned

or
VOTE: uncrowned

are both valid - the trick is the colon

Code: Select all

[b]vote: uncrowned[/b]
[v]uncrowned[/v]

oh, needs a colon does it?
I just assumed i'd be able to pick up mafia again, but i spend a little time yesterday reading through my old games and whilst loads of it came flooding back when actualyl writing a post i got all flumuxed.
Note to all. I'm from Wales so my time zones may not match up with others brilliantly. and weekend posting will be less than during the week

@Geraintm

Any reason behind your vote?

In post 29, Uncrowned wrote:@Geraintm

Any reason behind your vote?

yes, in my first post i put in a number, and then i vote for whoever made the post that number after it.
go back and check my old games and you'll see i have always done the same.

i thought i explained this already?

I think the mod would call it valid either way, but it's less Abbi hyphen if we all use a similar format y'know?

How's Cymru btw?

In post 31, the worst wrote: How's Cymru btw?

cold, wet and dark
how's the pond?

The pond is quite nice!

Any thoughts on Uncrowned's contributions so far?

@TW

Explain your vote ty ty

In post 33, the worst wrote:The pond is quite nice!

Any thoughts on Uncrowned's contributions so far?

Overeager newbie, can't stop talking, using some stuff they have picked up to just say anything.
i have little intereest in what people are saying right now when we are still waiting for stragglers

@uncrowned, not yet - looking for a couple of things in reactions

@gerain - fair enough. let me know when you have some reads.

cool cool

Cool, this started quick.

VOTE: Uncrowned

I would vote the worst, although I don't really want to put him at L-1 so early.

In post 38, NaCl wrote:Cool, this started quick.

VOTE: Uncrowned

I would vote the worst,

why?

I don't like that he seemed worried about there being 2 votes on his wagon, and his argument seemed weird. That it was statistically unlikely for someone to hit scum with their RVS votes is not something I consider relevant when I'd make my RVS vote, and it felt like he's kind of softly saying uncrowned should take his vote away for that reason.

VOTE: the worst

That is L-1

To give a reason it is because I feel like a craby crab snibbity snab.

UNVOTE: the worst way too early to have someone at L-1.

In post 44, Thomth wrote:To give a reason it is because I feel like a craby crab snibbity snab.

In post 43, Thomth wrote:VOTE: the worst

That is L-1

Was this truly an RVS? I feel like there is no good reason to put someone at L-1 on day 1 of day 1

In post 11, LoserdudeOG wrote:Sup Arkais, sorry u got NKed last time :’(

It's alright. Reading the Mafia Thread showed it was clearly between taking Dunn at face value vs me. I'd have done the same, and killed myself too.


Also, how on earth do we have the Worst at L-1 already?

Personally though, I want to know more about Uncrowned. His posts so far rub me the wrong way.

VOTE: Uncrowned

-

-