Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2020 4:35 am
He was already voting and trying to bait a fake speedhammer.
Not voting early is w/e. Making three posts none of which actually engage with the scum finding of the game is very suspect though.In post 24, theslimer3 wrote:What, is RQS dead or something?
Also wouldn’t be the first time I’ve hit l-1 for not doing rvs
In post 11, bugspray wrote:Hello everyone!I'm going to try something new for this game(also because maybe it will help end RVS sooner?) after I've typed up each of my postsI will reread themanddecide if I feel any bits are alignment indicative. Then I willitalicize anything I think is townishandbold anything I think is scummish.This is for the benefit of townand also myself.
VOTE: slimer
Both of you have terrible opens by the way.In post 24, theslimer3 wrote:What, is RQS dead or something?
Also wouldn’t be the first time I’ve hit l-1 for not doing rvs
Wait wha? Like top or bottom of the page?
My apologies, next time it’s the beginning of the game I’ll be sure to find the scum before posting twiceIn post 28, chamber wrote:Not voting early is w/e. Making three posts none of which actually engage with the scum finding of the game is very suspect though.In post 24, theslimer3 wrote:What, is RQS dead or something?
Also wouldn’t be the first time I’ve hit l-1 for not doing rvs
I still don’t see how my opening is terribleIn post 29, Salamence20 wrote:In post 11, bugspray wrote:Hello everyone!I'm going to try something new for this game(also because maybe it will help end RVS sooner?) after I've typed up each of my postsI will reread themanddecide if I feel any bits are alignment indicative. Then I willitalicize anything I think is townishandbold anything I think is scummish.This is for the benefit of townand also myself.
VOTE: slimerBoth of you have terrible opens by the way.In post 24, theslimer3 wrote:What, is RQS dead or something?
Also wouldn’t be the first time I’ve hit l-1 for not doing rvs
my open was amazing and did exactly what I wanted it to doIn post 29, Salamence20 wrote: Both of you have terrible opens by the way.
Actually I didn’t.In post 20, gobbledygook wrote:Both of them did the newbie greeting tell so potentiallyIn post 18, chamber wrote:Is it just slimer and wimpy?
No it isn’t.In post 28, chamber wrote:Not voting early is w/e. Making three posts none of which actually engage with the scum finding of the game is very suspect though.In post 24, theslimer3 wrote:What, is RQS dead or something?
Also wouldn’t be the first time I’ve hit l-1 for not doing rvs
You have unrealistic expectations for page 1/2In post 32, chamber wrote:It's not about knowing who the scum are 2 posts into the game. It's about making an effort to find out. You made a greeting post and then 2 reactive posts to NAI things.
So basically participate in rqs in the first part of the game no matter whatIn post 32, chamber wrote:It's not about knowing who the scum are 2 posts into the game. It's about making an effort to find out. You made a greeting post and then 2 reactive posts to NAI things.
In post 37, Wimpy wrote:You have unrealistic expectations for page 1/2In post 32, chamber wrote:It's not about knowing who the scum are 2 posts into the game. It's about making an effort to find out. You made a greeting post and then 2 reactive posts to NAI things.
I'd find it less suspicious if you had just said nothing, so no to both of you.In post 38, theslimer3 wrote:So basically participate in rqs in the first part of the game no matter whatIn post 32, chamber wrote:It's not about knowing who the scum are 2 posts into the game. It's about making an effort to find out. You made a greeting post and then 2 reactive posts to NAI things.
This offends my sensibilities.
Oh you sweet summer child. I suggest using Le Google to answer your questions. Safe search on if at work.In post 30, theslimer3 wrote:Wait wha? Like top or bottom of the page?
What is the newbie greeting tell then?In post 35, Wimpy wrote:Actually I didn’t.In post 20, gobbledygook wrote:Both of them did the newbie greeting tell so potentiallyIn post 18, chamber wrote:Is it just slimer and wimpy?
Hmm...In post 40, bugspray wrote:VOTE: wimpy
putting pressure on more scummy ppl while allowing others to join the slimer wagon without it going to l-1
You didn't engage. You pretended to.In post 43, theslimer3 wrote:So lurking is less suspicious than engaging. Makes sense if you don’t think about it
You’re accusing me of using it and you don’t even know?In post 45, gobbledygook wrote:What is the newbie greeting tell then?