Mafiascum.net

Solon/Elmo is likely T/S (in some order) says you, yet you proceed to place a seemingly random vote on Tanner?

Explain yourself at once!

In post 15, Tanner wrote:

In post 0, TheWizard wrote:2. Mafia has nightchat only.

A lot of my games have had daytalk. Apologies Its been a while
Scum does not have daytalk. Lovely "Townslip" there Elmo.

Also Been in a lot of newbie games where scum has daytalk.
Eh call it what you want. Its been a while since I've really played this setup.

In post 17, Knightmare491 wrote:

In post 13, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Cop was worthless to begin with if you think about it.

Why?

Lets think about this. We're relying on interactions from the SK and Mafia both to know what the switch positions are and was so if they are working together by random act of chance. Then they would be able to block out any Town PR

In post 18, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 13, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Unless we Hit Mafia the next two days along with a Vig shot we're walking towards a 1:1:1 scenario which then says which side played better with town being a judge in the end on who played the better game of mafia.

Well it's 8:3:1 right now, not sure why you jumped straight to the game going to 1:1:1

Let me think about this I had thought it was a 6:3:1 With an 11 player setup. Clearly I'm bad and can't count.

In post 20, Knightmare491 wrote:

In post 13, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Welp This was a fun game. So what PR we got left? Tracker? Oh Na we got the vig. Yes I'm reading this setup as I move down the list.

I'm assuming you were reading the list of roles here https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... ch_(Setup)
Why would you guess tracker, or anything else for that matter? Cop, Doc and Vig are mentioned consecutively below each other in that order.

I saw switch I signed up. But hey I'm not allowed to mess up at all apparently?

In post 21, Dunnstral wrote:Yeah this game is going to be tough, unfairly so, and for town to win we probably need to bank on at least 1 cross kill between sk and mafia.

Post 13 is wild - does anti-town really make a post like that right away? It looks to be too suspect to be scum, in a way.

Is it really anti town or is it just looking at a game and looking at it from the night start perspective.

In post 25, Solon wrote:Solon/Elmo is likely T/S (in some order) says you, yet you proceed to place a seemingly random vote on Tanner?

Explain yourself at once!

Isn't it obvious throw doubt on me so he can use it to his advantage later when there is a wagon on me and he can say called it.

Elmo Town.

VOTE: NDMath

In post 26, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Lets think about this. We're relying on interactions from the SK and Mafia both to know what the switch positions are and was so if they are working together by random act of chance. Then they would be able to block out any Town PR

That's true, but at the end of the day it's a chance. It's not like the Cop was going to get wrong results(unless the SK has chosen cop immunity and he gets checked), he'd either get results or no results.

In post 26, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:I saw switch I signed up. But hey I'm not allowed to mess up at all apparently?

No, you're not allowed to
On a more serious note, so you're saying that you had no idea about the setup?

In post 29, Knightmare491 wrote:On a more serious note, so you're saying that you had no idea about the setup?

Number of players honestly. I thought this was an 11p setup not a 14p. Which is why I thought we were heading quickly to a 1:1:1.

This is unfortunate. Anyway, VOTE: Solon

Also I feel like this would be a game where scum would have the confidence to try to take a town leading role

Do you think Solon is trying to do that?

He could be. That's not my reason for voting him though. It's too early to get a read based on that.

Do you want to share your reason?

In post 34, Raya36 wrote:He could be. That's not my reason for voting him though. It's too early to get a read based on that.

I disagree. But for my own reasons.

I'd prefer keeping it to myself for now to see if the reason persists since it's still early rvs. But I will get back to you on that

In post 36, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:

In post 34, Raya36 wrote:He could be. That's not my reason for voting him though. It's too early to get a read based on that.

I disagree. But for my own reasons.

Disagree that he could be doing that?

@ Elmo, clusterfuck of a beginning.

In post 21, Dunnstral wrote:
Post 13 is wild - does anti-town really make a post like that right away? It looks to be too suspect to be scum, in a way.

It reads desperate for attention as well as scummy.
Why strikethrough?

In post 24, NDMath wrote:I suppose everyone can safely soft vigilante now.

The Elmo/Solon interaction has heavy potential to be T/S in some order.

I've already got a slight townread on Dunnstral.

VOTE: Tanner

Elaborate, please.
Each statement reads peculiar.

In post 25, Solon wrote:Solon/Elmo is likely T/S (in some order) says you, yet you proceed to place a seemingly random vote on Tanner?

Explain yourself at once!

+1

VOTE: NDMath

In post 38, Raya36 wrote:

In post 36, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:

In post 34, Raya36 wrote:He could be. That's not my reason for voting him though. It's too early to get a read based on that.

I disagree. But for my own reasons.

Disagree that he could be doing that?

I disagree with not posting the reasons but over half the people haven't posted at this time which is fine.

alban wrote:@ Elmo, clusterfuck of a beginning.

Thanks I tried. Then I realized I read the setup completely wrong.

In post 40, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:

In post 38, Raya36 wrote:

In post 36, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:

In post 34, Raya36 wrote:He could be. That's not my reason for voting him though. It's too early to get a read based on that.

I disagree. But for my own reasons.

Disagree that he could be doing that?

I disagree with not posting the reasons but over half the people haven't posted at this time which is fine.

I normally don't hold back reasoning but since it's very early game and I'd like to see if it continues then why not

Raya Town.

In post 38, Raya36 wrote:

In post 36, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:

In post 34, Raya36 wrote:He could be. That's not my reason for voting him though. It's too early to get a read based on that.

I disagree. But for my own reasons.

Disagree that he could be doing that?

@Raya - Thats why I said its fine at this current moment

In post 14, Solon wrote:
Why aren’t you voting Emperor?

i was tired and just wanted the first post. didn't really care to choose someone to fake murder at the time

In post 13, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:

Cop was worthless to begin with if you think about it. And only being one NK shows that either Mafia or SK didn't feel the need to kill which my best guess is the SK didn't kill anyone or the doc got lucky and said Na Imma save you tonight.

Elmo is an idiot and didn't see there was a second kill and Feels bad for this.

i don't get why you called yourself out for not realizing something instead of just switching up what you were saying. feels weird to me

In post 7, Tanner wrote:gg, we lost.

Would it make me a shitbag if I replaced out, lol?

In post 16, Dunnstral wrote:Bruh

Agreed.

I'm assuming days are going to be very long to compensate for the lost of the important PRs. I feel like the game just became immediately scumsided.

VOTE: MariaR Your name is pretty and I replaced you at one point.

Well if it makes you feel better I almost called myself Panda, and spoke in the third person. Really it was more for me then anything else and wasn't going to delete my post though I could have taken notes for the setup or opened the page but I chose not to do any of that because well I've played this setup before.

In post 47, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Well if it makes you feel better I almost called myself Panda, and spoke in the third person. Really it was more for me then anything else and wasn't going to delete my post though I could have taken notes for the setup or opened the page but I chose not to do any of that because well I've played this setup before.

okay

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL